Literature DB >> 33849032

Real-World Experience with Artificial Intelligence-Based Triage in Transferred Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Patients.

Jacob R Morey1, Xiangnan Zhang1, Kurt A Yaeger1, Emily Fiano1, Naoum Fares Marayati1, Christopher P Kellner1, Reade A De Leacy1, Amish Doshi2, Stanley Tuhrim3, Johanna T Fifi1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the importance of time to endovascular therapy (EVT) in clinical outcomes in large vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke. Delays to treatment are particularly prevalent when patients require a transfer from hospitals without EVT capability onsite. A computer-aided triage system, Viz LVO, has the potential to streamline workflows. This platform includes an image viewer, a communication system, and an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that automatically identifies suspected LVO strokes on CTA imaging and rapidly triggers alerts. We hypothesize that the Viz application will decrease time-to-treatment, leading to improved clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was assessed for patients who presented to a stroke center currently utilizing Viz LVO and underwent EVT following transfer for LVO stroke between July 2018 and March 2020. Time intervals and clinical outcomes were compared for 55 patients divided into pre- and post-Viz cohorts.
RESULTS: The median initial door-to-neuroendovascular team (NT) notification time interval was significantly faster (25.0 min [IQR = 12.0] vs. 40.0 min [IQR = 61.0]; p = 0.01) with less variation (p < 0.05) following Viz LVO implementation. The median initial door-to-skin puncture time interval was 25 min shorter in the post-Viz cohort, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results have shown that Viz LVO implementation is associated with earlier, more consistent NT notification times. This application can serve as an early warning system and a failsafe to ensure that no LVO is left behind.
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; CT angiography; Stroke; Technology; Thrombectomy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33849032     DOI: 10.1159/000515320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  3 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in "Code Stroke"-A Paradigm Shift: Do Radiologists Need to Change Their Practice?

Authors:  Achala Vagal; Luca Saba
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 2.  Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Endovascular Neurosurgery.

Authors:  Javier Bravo; Arvin R Wali; Brian R Hirshman; Tilvawala Gopesh; Jeffrey A Steinberg; Bernard Yan; J Scott Pannell; Alexander Norbash; James Friend; Alexander A Khalessi; David Santiago-Dieppa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-30

3.  Emergency triage of brain computed tomography via anomaly detection with a deep generative model.

Authors:  Seungjun Lee; Boryeong Jeong; Minjee Kim; Ryoungwoo Jang; Wooyul Paik; Jiseon Kang; Won Jung Chung; Gil-Sun Hong; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 17.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.