Literature DB >> 33848664

Validation of a high-throughput method for analysis of pesticide residues in hemp and hemp products.

Nicolás Michlig1, Steven J Lehotay2, Alan R Lightfield3, Horacio Beldoménico4, María Rosa Repetti4.   

Abstract

Hemp has been an agricultural commodity for millennia, and it has been undergoing a resurgence in interest and production due to its high content of cannabinoids, protein, fiber and other ingredients. For legal possession and use throughout the USA, hemp and hemp products must have delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration < 0.3%. As with most crops, pesticides may be applied when farming hemp, which need to be monitored in food, feed, and medicinal products. The aim of this work was to evaluate and validate the recently developed "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, safe, efficient, and robust" (QuEChERSER) sample preparation mega-method to determine pesticide residues in hemp plants, flowers, powders, oils, and pellets. High-throughput analysis of final extracts for 106 targeted pesticides and metabolites from North American monitoring lists entailed: 1) ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) with column back-flushing, and 2) instrument-top sample preparation + low-pressure gas chromatography (ITSP+LPGC-MS/MS). In QuEChERSER, 2 g sample is extracted with 10 mL 4/1 (v/v) acetonitrile/water by mechanical shaking for 10 min, followed by 3 min centrifugation. For LC, 0.2 mL of extract is taken and solvent exchanged into initial mobile phase followed by 5 min ultra-centrifugation prior to the 10 min analysis. For GC-amenable pesticides, the remaining initial extract is partitioned with 4/1 (w/w) anh. MgSO4/NaCl, and 1 mL is taken for automated ITSP cleanup in parallel with 10 min LPGC analysis. In the former case, the UHPLC column is back-flushed with 1/1 (v/v) methanol/acetonitrile for 3 min between each injection to keep the system clean and avoid ghost peaks. Multi-level, multi-day validation results achieved 70-120% recoveries with RSDs < 20% for more than 80% of the analytes in hemp protein powder, oil, pellets, and fresh plant (dried hemp plant and flower were too complex). Limits of quantification (LOQs) were < 10 ng/g were achieved for nearly all pesticides, yielding 2.8% false negatives among >13,000 analyte results in the spiked samples. The QuEChERSER method was demonstrated to meet the challenge for several complex hemp matrices.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemp (Cannabis sativa); Instrument-top sample preparation (ITSP); Low-pressure gas chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (LPGC-MS/MS); Pesticide residue analysis; QuEChERSER; Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS)

Year:  2021        PMID: 33848664     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pesticide-Residue Analysis in Soils by the QuEChERS Method: A Review.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel González-Curbelo; Diana Angélica Varela-Martínez; Diego Alejandro Riaño-Herrera
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.927

2.  Fast pesticide analysis using low-pressure gas chromatography paired with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with short collision cell technology.

Authors:  Kirk R Jensen; A John Dane; Robert B Cody
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Analysis of the California list of pesticides, mycotoxins, and cannabinoids in chocolate using liquid chromatography and low-pressure gas chromatography-based platforms.

Authors:  Nathaly Reyes-Garcés; Colton Myers
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.645

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.