Literature DB >> 33847868

Mental well-being of the general population: direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic, relational and health factors.

Natalia Soldevila-Domenech1,2,3, Carlos G Forero4, Itxaso Alayo1,5, Jordina Capella6,7, Joan Colom6, Davide Malmusi5,8, Anna Mompart9, Philippe Mortier1,5, Beatriz Puértolas1,5, Néstor Sánchez4, Anna Schiaffino9,10, Gemma Vilagut11,12, Jordi Alonso13,14,15.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the association between individual mental well-being and social, economic, lifestyle and health factors.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study on a representative sample of 13,632 participants (> 15y/o) from the Catalan Health Interview Survey 2013-2016 editions. Mental well-being was assessed with the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Linear regressions were fitted to associate well-being and sociodemographic, relational, lifestyle and health variables according to minimally sufficient adjustment sets identified using directed acyclic graphs. Predictors entered the model in blocks of variable types and analysed individually. Direct and total effects were estimated.
RESULTS: Health factors significantly contributed to mental well-being variance. Presence of a mental disorder and self-reported health had the largest effect size (eta2 = 13.4% and 16.3%). The higher individual impact from a variable came from social support (β = - 12.8, SE = 0.48, eta2 = 6.3%). A noticeable effect gradient (eta2 = 4.2%) from low to high mental well-being emerged according to economic difficulties (from β = 1.59, SE = 0.33 for moderate difficulties to β = 6.02 SE = 0.55 for no difficulties). Younger age (β = 5.21, SE = 0.26, eta2 = 3.4%) and being men (β = 1.32, SE = 0.15, eta2 = 0.6%) were associated with better mental well-being. Direct gender effects were negligible.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights health and social support as the most associated factors with individual mental well-being over socioeconomic factors. Interventions and policies aimed to these factors for health promotion would improve population mental well-being.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Directed acyclic graphs; Health determinants; Health survey; Mental health; WEMWBS; Well-being

Year:  2021        PMID: 33847868     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02813-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  24 in total

1.  The relative importance of health, income and social relations for subjective well-being: An integrative analysis.

Authors:  Admassu N Lamu; Jan Abel Olsen
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies.

Authors:  Yoichi Chida; Andrew Steptoe
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  [Proposals for social class classification based on the Spanish National Classification of Occupations 2011 using neo-Weberian and neo-Marxist approaches].

Authors:  Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Amaia Bacigalupe; José Miguel Carrasco; Albert Espelt; Josep Ferrando; Carme Borrell
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.139

5.  "I'm afraid I have bad news for you…" Estimating the impact of different health impairments on subjective well-being.

Authors:  Martin Binder; Alex Coad
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  How is your health in general? A qualitative study on self-assessed health.

Authors:  J G Simon; J B De Boer; I M A Joung; H Bosma; J P Mackenbach
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.367

8.  The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measurement of social support in family medicine patients.

Authors:  W E Broadhead; S H Gehlbach; F V de Gruy; B H Kaplan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 10.  Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah Tough; Johannes Siegrist; Christine Fekete
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Fresh Evidence of Income Inequality and Health Outcomes Asymmetric Linkages in Emerging Asian Economies.

Authors:  Shuangshuang Chang; Bin Gao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-23

2.  Socioeconomic inequality in mental well-being associated with COVID-19 containment measures in a low-incidence Asian globalized city.

Authors:  Roger Yat-Nork Chung; Gary Ka-Ki Chung; Siu-Ming Chan; Yat-Hang Chan; Hung Wong; Eng Kiong Yeoh; Jessica Allen; Jean Woo; Michael Marmot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.