Literature DB >> 33847628

Global research status of gastroenterology and hepatology: A bibliometrics study.

Huai-Yu Yang1,2, Dan Wang1,2, Cui Chen1,2, Yu Liu3, Chao Han1,2, Ye Gao1,2, Zhao-Shen Li1,2, Zhuan Liao1,2, Liang-Hao Hu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no reports on global research status of gastroenterology and hepatology (GI). This study was conducted to reveal the current global research status and trends in GI.
METHODS: Articles published during 2009 to 2018 in international GI journals were retrieved from the PubMed database. The top 20 countries by output were determined. The gross domestic product (GDP) of each country was also retrieved to figure out the correlation between outputs in GI and economy. The 5 highest-ranking countries were compared in the number of total articles, articles per capita, articles published in top journals, the accumulated impact factor (IF), and average IF. Total articles and articles per capita of the 5 countries were conducted time-trend analysis. The frequently-used terms in titles and abstracts of articles published in 2009 and 2018 were retrieved to conduct co-occurrence analysis to figure out the change of research highlights in GI.
RESULTS: A total of 120,267 articles were included, of which 116,485 articles were from 20 highest-output countries. There was a positive correlation between output and GDP (r = 0.921, P < .001). The USA, Japan, China, Italy, and the UK were the 5 highest-ranking countries. The USA was the largest contributor with 26,215 articles, accounting for 17.4% of the total, but with no significant increasing trend (P = .122). Other 4 countries all showed increasing trends (all P < .001). For articles per capita, Italy ranked 1st among the 5 countries with 1591.0 articles per 10 million. The USA showed a decreasing trend (P = .026), other 4 countries all showed increasing trends (all P < .001). The UK had the highest average IF (6.685). For change of research highlights, it is more inclined to research of endoscopy, inflammatory bowel diseases, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
CONCLUSION: It is delightful that the global research output in GI field would be continuingly increased as the major highest-output countries showed increasing trends. However, the developing countries fell behind both in quantity and quality when compared with developed countries.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33847628      PMCID: PMC8051975          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Gastroenterology and hepatology (GI) are the branches of medicine that incorporate the study of stomach, intestine, liver, gallbladder, and pancreas as well as the managements of their disorders. Gastrointestinal and liver diseases have lots of varieties and considerable prevalence rate worldwide, especially the malignant tumors and viral hepatitis. A global study found that in 2016, 3 of top 10 cancers originated from digestive system, namely-colon and rectum cancer, stomach cancer and liver cancer, with totally 3.9 million incident case and almost 2.5 million deaths.[ Chronic hepatitis B virus infection was reported up to 250 million persons worldwide and caused nearly 900,000 deaths per year.[ Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is a disease that progresses with industrialization. In western world, it is now in the stage of compounding prevalence, with a stable incidence of 12 to 26 per 100,000 persons, but with a steeply rising prevalence which will be 1% by 2030 in many regions.[ Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the major metabolic that occur in almost 1 in every 4 people of the world.[ Thus, the study on GI field has always been a pivotal part of medicine research. Recent years, benefiting from the advancement of modern medicine, some breakthroughs were achieved in research of GI field. Such as the development of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus (HCV),[ the discovery of special effects of gut microbiota to human body,[ the new treatments for irritable bowel syndrome based on mechanistic discoveries[ and development of capsule endoscopy in diagnosing and screening for large-bowel neoplasia. However, there were still considerable mysteries and challenges to be solved, such as the pathogenesis of major complications of cirrhosis, treatment of the deadliest gastrointestinal cancers, limitations of capsule endoscopy in locating the lesion site and taking biopsy samples at the spot.[ For decades, global gastroenterologists and hepatologists have been dedicated to figure out various issues and found new challenges in GI fields. Their outcomes were showed as publications on lots international medicine journals. This study aimed to reveal the global research status and each country's contribution in GI field based on a 10-year survey of publications.

Materials and methods

This study was a bibliometrics study which did not involve any clinical trials and patient consent. Therefore, there was no need for approval of ethics committee or institutional review board. A total of 80 journals were selected from the “Gastroenterology and Hepatology” category established by the Institute for Scientific Information, Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2017.[ To determine the contribution for all countries, a total of 193 member states of the United Nations were included.[ The “PubMed” database was searched in May 2019 to determine the global number of articles and the number of articles from each country published from January 2009 to December 2018.[ The ISSN (International Standard Serial Number) was used to perform the search in “PubMed.” The search terms were “0016-5085 OR 1759-5045 OR 0017-5749 OR 0168-8278 OR 0270-9139 OR 0002-9270 OR 1542-3565 OR 0269-2813 OR 0016-5107 OR 1873-9946 OR 0013-726X OR 0944-1174 OR 1436-3291 OR 1089-3261 OR 2155-384X OR 1478-3223 OR 1078-0998 OR 1352-0504 OR 1756-283X OR 0272-8087 OR 1083-4389 OR 1936-0533 OR 1350-1925 OR 1527-6465 OR 1521-6918 OR 0012-3706 OR 0815-9319 OR 2050-6406 OR 2304-3881 OR 2093-0879 OR 1386-6346 OR 0267-1379 OR 0915-5635 OR 2303-9027 OR 1007-9327 OR 0193-1857 OR 1590-8658 OR 0889-8553 OR 1948-5204 OR 1365-182X OR 0192-0790 OR 1747-4124 OR 0885-3177 OR 1868-6974 OR 1976-2283 OR 0163-2116 OR 1091-255X OR 1757-4749 OR 1462-8910 OR 1424-3903 OR 0277-2116 OR 1471-230X OR 1442-2050 OR 2052-0034 OR 0036-5521 OR 2210-7401 OR 0179-1958 OR 0942-8925 OR 1123-6337 OR 0012-2823 OR 0253-4886 OR 0954-691X OR 1841-8724 OR 1687-6121 OR 1735-143X OR 1130-0108 OR 1751-2972 OR 2291-2797 OR 0044-2771 OR 1665-2681 OR 1319-3767 OR 1499-3872 OR 2093-582X OR 1531-0043 OR 0210-5705 OR 1612-9059 OR 1300-4948 OR 1687-1979 OR 1784-3227 OR 1042-895X,” “country[ad].” The numbers of clinical trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were determined using the “Article types” category established by PubMed. The shares of each country in total articles, clinical trials and RCTs were then calculated. The 20 countries with the highest output were determined according to the number of total articles from each country. To figure out the correlation between the outputs and economic development level of 20 highest-outputs countries, the gross domestic product (GDP) was used as the indicator of economic status and each country's GDP was retrieved from World Bank Open Data.[ The 5 highest-output countries were selected for quantity and quality comparisons. The annual numbers of articles, clinical trials and RCTs from these 5 countries were retrieved. The populations of the 5 countries from 2009 to 2018 were extracted[ and then used to calculate the total and annual number of articles per capita. The number of total articles and the number of articles per capita for all 5 countries were evaluated by time-trend analyses. To compare the quality of the articles from the 5 countries, 3 methods were used. First, the impact factor (IF) of each journal was retrieved from JCR 2017, and each country's number of articles published in every journal was also determined. Then, the accumulated IFs of each country were calculated by summing the IFs of all the articles. The average IF was calculated by dividing the accumulated IFs by the total number of articles. Second, journals with IFs of more than 10 (Gastroenterology, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Gut, Journal of Hepatology, Hepatology, American Journal of Gastroenterology) were identified to determine the number of publications from the 5 countries in high-quality journals. The numbers of articles published in these journals from the 5 countries were then retrieved. Third, the accumulated immediacy index (ImI), average ImI, accumulated article influence score (AIS) and average AIS of articles of the 5 countries were calculated. In addition, according to the number of articles published by the 5 countries in every journal, the 5 most popular journals were determined for each country. To figure out the change of research highlights in GI, the frequently-used terms in titles and abstracts of articles published in 2009 and 2018 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded database of Web of Science[ and then were conducted co-occurrence analysis using VOS viewer.[ The keywords (defined as words that were used more than 30 times in titles and abstracts of all articles) were retrieved and 60% most relevant keywords were further identified to generated the final co-occurrence map. Using the same method, the main research topics of the 5 countries in 2018 were also analyzed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0.[ Regression analysis was used to determine whether there was any significant change in China's share over the time period. Pearson test was used to determine whether there was any correlation between outputs and GDP of each country. The test for significance was two-tailed, and P < .05 was considered significant.

Results

Numbers of total articles, clinical trials, and RCTs

A total of 120,267 articles were published from January 2009 to December 2018 in GI journals, of which 116,485 articles were from the 20 highest-ranking countries, accounting for 96.86% of the total (Table 1). These countries are mainly located in West Europe, North America, and East Asia. China and India are the only 2 developing countries (Fig. 1). There was a significant positive correlation between the outputs and GDP of each country (r = 0.921, P < .001, Fig. 2). The USA ranked 1st, with 26,215 articles, accounting for 17.4% of the total, but there was no significant increasing trend (P = .122). Japan, China, Italy, and the UK ranked 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th, with 13,779 (9.2%), 13,379 (8.9%), 9433 (6.3%), and 7536 (5.0%) articles, respectively. All showed increasing trends (all P < .001, Fig. 3). For clinical trials, the USA published 1255 articles, accounting for 16.7% of the total. Japan, Italy, China, and the UK ranked 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and with 927 (12.3%), 578 (7.7%), 545 (7.2%), and 380 (5.1%) articles, respectively. With regards to RCTs, the USA, Japan, China, Italy, and the UK ranked 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 7th, with 894 (17.6%), 538 (10.6%), 385 (7.6%), 365 (7.2%), and 268 (5.3%) articles, respectively.
Table 1

Share of articles in gastroenterology and hepatology for 20 highest-ranking countries.

All articles (n = 120267)Clinical trials (n = 7141)Randomized controlled trials (n = 4900)
RankCountryNumberPercentage (%)CountryNumberPercentage (%)CountryNumberPercentage (%)
1USA2621517.4USA125516.7USA89417.6
2Japan137799.2Japan92712.3Japan53810.6
3China133798.9Italy5787.7China3857.6
4Italy94336.3China5457.2Italy3657.2
5UK75365.0Germany5066.7Germany3306.5
6Germany71004.7Netherlands4095.4Netherlands2925.8
7France59053.9France3825.1UK2685.3
8Spain46733.1UK3805.1France2494.9
9Netherlands45083.0Spain2883.8Spain1863.7
10Canada42352.8Canada2363.1Canada1773.5
11Australia35922.4Belgium2303.1Australia1703.4
12India22751.5Australia2273.0Belgium1683.3
13Belgium22431.5Sweden1782.4Sweden1332.6
14Israel21631.4Denmark1672.2Denmark1292.5
15Sweden19811.3Israel1492.0India1272.5
16Denmark18281.2India1482.0Israel941.9
17Switzerland17641.2Switzerland1151.5Switzerland911.8
18South Korea17201.1South Korea1091.4South Korea831.6
19Portugal11640.8Austria931.2Austria651.3
20Austria9920.7Portugal260.3Portugal180.4
Figure 1

The 20 highest-output countries.

Figure 2

The correlation between total articles and GDP from 20 highest-output countries.

Figure 3

The trends of the all articles from 5 highest-output countries during the past 10 years.

Share of articles in gastroenterology and hepatology for 20 highest-ranking countries. The 20 highest-output countries. The correlation between total articles and GDP from 20 highest-output countries. The trends of the all articles from 5 highest-output countries during the past 10 years. In addition, the share of RCTs in clinical trials in China was 70.64% (385/545), more than Japan (58.04%, 538/927), Italy (60.15%, 365/578), and the UK (70.53%, 268/380) and only slightly less than the USA (71.23%, 894/1255).

Number of articles per capita

In terms of the number of articles per capita, Italy had the most articles per capita among the 5 countries, with 1591.0 articles per 10 million. The UK, Japan, and the USA had 1132.0, 1091.5, and 799.5 articles per 10 million, respectively. China was at the bottom, with 95.9 articles per 10 million. Italy, the UK, Japan, and China all showed increasing trends (all P < .001), but the USA showed a decreasing trend (P = .026, Fig. 4).
Figure 4

The trends of numbers of articles per 10,000,000 people from 5 highest-output countries during the past 10 years.

The trends of numbers of articles per 10,000,000 people from 5 highest-output countries during the past 10 years.

Articles published in high-quality journals

The 5 highest-ranking countries published a total of 11,202 articles in the 6 highest-IF GI journals. The USA was the top contributor with 5369 articles. The UK, Italy, China, and Japan published 1833, 1603, 1383, and 1014 articles, respectively. The USA was the top contributor to all 6 journals. China published the least number of articles in Gastroenterology, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology and American Journal of Gastroenterology (241, 14, and 121) among the 5 countries. Japan published the least number of articles in Gut and Journal of Hepatology (147 and 181). The UK published the least number of articles in Hepatology (224). China's share of high-quality articles among its total output was 10.34% (1383/13,379), less than the USA (20.48%, 5369/26,215), Italy (16.99%, 1603/9433) and the UK (24.32%, 1833/7536) but more than Japan (7.36%, 1014/13779, Table 2).
Table 2

Number of articles published in 6 highest-IF journals.

Country
RankJournal2017IFUSAJapanChinaItalyUKTotal
1Gastroenterology20.77310553022412972972192
2NRGH17.324338271463126568
3Gut17.0167391471802345881888
4JOH15.0406801812794614002001
5Hepatology14.0799202315483632242286
6AJG10.23116371261211851982267
Total5369101413831603183311202
Number of articles published in 6 highest-IF journals.

Accumulated IFs, average IF, and other indicators

The USA had the highest accumulated IF (166,823.9), accumulated ImI (52,312.5) and accumulated AIS (52,645.8). The UK had the highest average IF (6.685), average ImI (2.319), and average AIS (2.099). China ranked 3rd in accumulated IF (60,353.8) and accumulated AIS (17,262.2) and ranked 5th in accumulated ImI (16,270.7). However, China had the lowest average IF, average ImI, and average AIS among the 5 countries (Table 3).
Table 3

Indicators of articles from 5 highest-ranking countries.

CountryAccumulated IFAverage IFAccumulated ImIAverage ImIAccumulated AISAverage AIS
USA166823.8826.27052312.4821.96652645.7951.979
Japan67431.5594.76421497.3411.51918717.1551.322
China60353.8394.40316270.7251.18717262.1751.259
Italy54964.3185.68617087.4561.76816707.2931.728
UK52447.3526.68518196.9452.31916470.0742.099
Indicators of articles from 5 highest-ranking countries.

Most popular journals

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy was the most popular journal in the USA, with 2313 articles published; Hepatology Research was the most popular in Japan, with 1,133 articles published; World Journal of Gastroenterology was the most popular journal in China, with 3310 articles published. Digestive and Liver Disease was the most popular in Italy, with 1064 articles published; and Colorectal Disease was the most popular in the UK, with 1055 articles published (Table 4).
Table 4

Most popular Journals of 5 highest-ranking countries.

RankUSANJapanNChinaNItalyNUKN
1GIE2313HR1133WJG3310DLD1064CD1055
2DDS2137JOG1110DDS666WJG867APT666
3AJG1637WJG1087JGH560JOH461Gut588
4JGS1563DE944HPDI557Hepatology363JOH400
5Gastroenterology1055JGH809Hepatology548JPGN340Gastroenterology297
Most popular Journals of 5 highest-ranking countries.

Change of research highlights

For articles published in 2009, there were 2720 terms meeting the threshold of 30 and 1632 most relevant terms were extracted to generated the co-occurrence map (Fig. 5A). The terms were classified into 5 clusters: “gastrointestinal malignant lesions,” “gastrointestinal benign lesions,” “liver diseases,” “animal study” and “gastrointestinal nervous system,” painted in red, blue, yellow, green, and purple, respectively. For “gastrointestinal malignant lesions,” the keywords were: carcinoma, complication, and surgery. For “gastrointestinal benign lesions,” the keywords were: colitis, quality, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. For “liver diseases,” the keywords were: HCV, fibrosis, and ribavirin. For “animal study”, the keywords were: expression, effect and protein. For “gastrointestinal nervous system,” the keywords were: secretion, antagonist, and contraction.
Figure 5

(A) The co-occurrence network map of researches in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology (GI) in 2009. (B) The co-occurrence network map of researches in GI in 2018. Each circle represents 1 term and terms with larger circles tend to be used more frequency. Terms shown with the same color mean the frequency of co-occurrence is higher and are listed together. The closer 2 terms in the map, the stronger their relation.

(A) The co-occurrence network map of researches in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology (GI) in 2009. (B) The co-occurrence network map of researches in GI in 2018. Each circle represents 1 term and terms with larger circles tend to be used more frequency. Terms shown with the same color mean the frequency of co-occurrence is higher and are listed together. The closer 2 terms in the map, the stronger their relation. For articles published in 2018, there were 3102 terms meeting the threshold and 1861 most relevant terms were extracted to generated the co-occurrence map (Fig. 5B). The terms were classified into 6 clusters: “gastrointestinal malignant lesions,” “liver diseases,” “animal study,” “functional gastrointestinal disorders,” “endoscopy” and “IBD,” painted in red, blue, green, yellow, purple, and indigo, respectively. For “gastrointestinal malignant lesions,” the keywords were: safety, resection, and adenocarcinoma. For “liver disease,” the keywords were: week, HCV, and NAFLD. For “animal study,” the keywords were: expression, role, and gene. For “functional gastrointestinal disorders,” the keywords were: irritable bowel syndrome, placebo, and esophagus. For “endoscopy,” the keywords were: lesion, colonoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography. For “IBD,” the keywords were: vedolizumab and remission.

Main research topics of each country

In 2018, American and Italy researchers both focused more on HCV and cirrhosis. Japanese researchers showed more interest on digestive systems tumors, such as gastric cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD and HBV were research focus of Chinese researchers. English researchers paid more attention to NAFLD and colorectal cancer.

Discussion

Correlation analysis showed that countries with higher GDP tend to had more outputs in GI field. These countries generally have advanced medical research institutions and top medicine researchers. The governments are capable to build a complete medical care system and provide abundant funds for medicine research. China's investment in research and development has exceeded that of any other countries except the USA, with funding increasing by 20% each year,[ leading to significant progress in several medical research fields.[ In GI field, the USA was the largest contributor both in total articles and articles published on top journals. It is dominance mainly benefited from enormous research funding and high-level researchers.[ However, the USA did not show an increasing trend in the total outputs and even had a decreasing trend in the output per capita. Some experts blamed it to the low success rates of grant submission and inappropriate allocation of funding resulting in the decline of the number of young physician-scientists.[ As the only developing country among 5 highest-output countries, China published a total number of 13,379 articles in the last decade with a significant increasing trend, following the USA and Japan. Its continuously increasing funding and number of medicine researchers were the main reasons for this progress. The number of projects in medical research funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China increased from 3163 in 2010 to 4455 in 2017, and the funding per project increased from 314.6 thousand RMB in 2010 to 543.5 thousand RMB in 2017.[ And the number of medical practitioners was nearly 2.83 million in 2017, with an increase of 48% from that in 2009,[ which far exceeded the increase of China's general population during the same period. In addition, China has an advantage in recruiting participants for clinical trials due to the large population with a high prevalence of digestive diseases.[ This could also partly explain the gap between China and other countries regarding the share of RCTs in clinical trials. The number of articles per capita may be influenced by population, the number, and research capacity of researchers. Italy had the most outputs per capita among 5 highest-output countries, nearly 16 times of that of China. In 2014, the number of clinician per 1000 people in Italy was 39.588, more than the USA (25.817), Japan (23.414), the UK (27.769), and China (16.989).[ Apparently, the high proportion of medical workforce brings Italy enormous advantage in outputs per capita even compared with other developed countries. However, this seemly could not fully explain the huge gap between Italy and China. In fact, unlike developed countries in which clinicians generally receive at least 5 to 6 years of bachelor's degree education, among the 3 million clinicians in China, only half received a bachelor's degree[ and a clinician generally began his research career only in graduate stage under the instruction of tutors. Thus, the proportion of clinicians capable to conduct medical research in China was lower and it is not surprising that China has lagged so far behind in output per capita. For articles quality, the UK ranked 1st in the average IF, average ImI and average ACS. China was all at the bottom. In the UK, the medical education is more prone to interest-guided. Medical schools offer intercalated bachelor of science degree programs and focus on cultivating research skills. Junior doctors can gain research skills except for the compulsory foundation program and clinical competencies and have opportunities to begin academic career according to their interest and passion.[ In China, medical education is more demand-oriented. At national level, due to the world largest population with a huge shortage of medical workforce, medical schools focus on students’ basic clinical knowledge and skills so they can quickly serve the goal of elevating national health level proposed by government.[ In consequence, Chinese junior doctors, especially in rural regions, generally lack research ability for high-quality study. On individual level, the academic evaluation system in China always focuses on the quantity of publications instead of quality, quantity is more meaningful to doctors or hospitals who want to apply for higher grade positions.[ Besides, Western countries always focus on the medical humanities education which get less attention in China. It seems to have no direct association with medical research. But medical humanities education do have important meanings on cultivating students’ professional, rigorous, honest, and responsible attitude required for high-quality research.[ In overall research highlights, the cluster of “gastrointestinal benign lesions” was turned into 2 main divisions: “functional gastrointestinal disorders” and “IBD”. The cluster of “endoscopy” emerged. The cluster of “gastrointestinal nervous system” disappeared as huge progress in this field had been realized.[ In specific fields, for liver disease, the NAFLD has got more attention as the most rapidly growing contributor to liver mortality and morbidity.[ Regarding the IBD, since the clinical application of vedolizumab approved by Food and Drug Administration in 2013, many clinical researches had been conducted to verify its effect. Recent years, the researches were transferred to its safety.[ For main research topics of 5 highest-ranking countries, viral hepatitis, NAFLD, and digestive system tumors were the focus due to their high prevalence or mortality worldwide. This result may predict the future direction of research and investment in GI field. There were some limitations in this study. First, a small number of articles were not included in this research since the authors’ affiliations were only recorded as city or state. Second, for China, we limited authors’ affiliations to “China NOT Hong Kong NOT Taiwan,” and only publications from Mainland China were retrieved. Third, we only retrieved journals from the “Gastroenterology and Hepatology” category established by JCR 2017. Some high-quality articles published in top general medicine journals were not captured by our search. In conclusion, global output in GI field would be increasing due to the mainly highest-output countries’ increasing trends in total output. The gap between developing countries and developed countries was still huge both in quantity and quality. Developing countries should be encouraged to conduct more high-quality researches in GI field.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Liang-Hao Hu, Zhuan Liao. Data curation: Huai-Yu Yang, Dan Wang, Cui Chen. Formal analysis: Huai-Yu Yang, Dan Wang, Cui Chen. Funding acquisition: Liang-Hao Hu, Dan Wang, Zhao-Shen Li. Investigation: Huai-Yu Yang. Methodology: Yu Liu, Chao Han, Ye Gao, Zhao-Shen Li. Software: Yu Liu, Chao Han, Ye Gao. Validation: Liang-Hao Hu, Zhao-Shen Li, Zhuan Liao. Writing – original draft: Huai-Yu Yang, Dan Wang, Cui Chen. Writing – review & editing: Liang-Hao Hu, Zhuan Liao.
  25 in total

1.  Japan's contribution to clinical research in gastroenterology and hepatology.

Authors:  Kenji Maeda; Mahbubur Rahman; Tsuguya Fukui
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Saving the Endangered Physician-Scientist - A Plan for Accelerating Medical Breakthroughs.

Authors:  Mukesh K Jain; Vivian G Cheung; Paul J Utz; Brian K Kobilka; Tadataka Yamada; Robert Lefkowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Medical education reform in China.

Authors:  Hui Li; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 4.  New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Pawlotsky
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Transformation of the education of health professionals in China: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Jianlin Hou; Catherine Michaud; Zhihui Li; Zhe Dong; Baozhi Sun; Junhua Zhang; Depin Cao; Xuehong Wan; Cheng Zeng; Bo Wei; Lijian Tao; Xiaosong Li; Weimin Wang; Yingqing Lu; Xiulong Xia; Guifang Guo; Zhiyong Zhang; Yunfei Cao; Yuanzhi Guan; Qingyue Meng; Qing Wang; Yuhong Zhao; Huaping Liu; Huiqing Lin; Yang Ke; Lincoln Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  The past 10 years of gastroenterology and hepatology-reflections and predictions.

Authors:  Scott L Friedman; Eamonn M M Quigley; Keith A Sharkey; Joseph J Y Sung; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Tu Youyou's Nobel Prize and the academic evaluation system in China.

Authors:  Xiao Zhai; Qijin Wang; Ming Li
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The Safety Profile of Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: 4 Years of Global Post-marketing Data.

Authors:  Russell D Cohen; Fatima Bhayat; Aimee Blake; Simon Travis
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 9.071

9.  Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study.

Authors:  Dan Xing; Yu Zhao; Shengjie Dong; Jianhao Lin
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 10.  The four epidemiological stages in the global evolution of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Gilaad G Kaplan; Joseph W Windsor
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 73.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.