| Literature DB >> 33847612 |
Dengke Fu1, Yang Chen1, Dongkui Xu2.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Previous studies showed that microRNA (miR)-449a may function as a tumor suppressor. However, the expression pattern and value of circulating miR-449a in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure circulating miR-449a level of CRC patients and evaluate its value for predicting prognosis.Plasma samples of 343 consecutive CRC patients and 162 healthy controls were obtained. Circulating miR-449a levels were measured by using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. All enrolled patients were followed up in a regular interval after surgery. The clinical data and survival outcome of all 343 patients were collected. The correlation between circulating miR-449a level and survival outcomes was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.Circulating miR-449a level in CRC patients was significantly decreased (P < .05) comparing with healthy controls. Low miR-449a was significantly associated with CEA and CA19-9 level (both P < .05). Furthermore, patients with a decreased miR-449a level had a lower 5-years overall survival (OS) rate than those with a high miR-449a (67.4% vs 76.9%, P = .03). Low circulating miR-449a level also been demonstrated as an independent risk factor for CRC in multivariate COX analysis (HR, 2.56; 95%CI: 1.15-8.63; P < .05).Circulating miR-449a was significantly decreased in CRC patients and closely related to poor prognosis, suggesting that miR-449a might can be used as a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for CRC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33847612 PMCID: PMC8052019 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Serum miR-449a level in colorectal cancer patients and healthy controls. The circulating miR-449a levels of 343 colorectal cancer patients was significant lower than that of 162 age-matched healthy volunteers (P < .05).
Figure 2Receiver-operator characteristic curve for CRC detection. ROC analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.76 for miR-449a with a 95% confidence interval between 0.58 and 0.94, P < .01.
Correlation between circulating miR-449a level and clinic variables of CRC patients.
| Circulating miR-449a | |||
| Characteristic | High (n = 117) | Low (n = 226) | |
| Age (yr) | .40 | ||
| ≥60 | 56 (47.9%) | 97 (42.9%) | |
| <60 | 61 (52.1%) | 129 (57.1%) | |
| Gender | .64 | ||
| Male | 74 (63.2%) | 137 (60.6%) | |
| Female | 43 (36.8%) | 89 (39.4%) | |
| Tumor site | .07 | ||
| Colon | 51 (43.6%) | 76 (33.6%) | |
| Rectum | 66 (56.4%) | 150 (66.4%) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | .99 | ||
| ≥5 | 43 (36.8%) | 83 (36.7%) | |
| <5 | 74 (63.2%) | 143 (63.3%) | |
| T stage | .10 | ||
| T1+T2 | 74 (63.2%) | 122 (54.0%) | |
| T3 | 43 (36.8%) | 104 (46.0%) | |
| Nodes involvement | .74 | ||
| N0 | 46 (39.3%) | 93 (41.2%) | |
| N1 | 71 (60.7%) | 133 (58.8%) | |
| Clinical stage (TNM) | .53 | ||
| I+II | 79 (67.5%) | 145 (64.2%) | |
| III | 38 (32.5%) | 81 (35.8%) | |
| Pathological differentiation | .25 | ||
| Well/Moderate | 66 (56.4%) | 142 (62.8%) | |
| Poor | 51 (43.6%) | 84 (37.2%) | |
| CEA (ng/ml) | <.01 | ||
| ≥5 | 10 (8.5%) | 80 (35.4%) | |
| <5 | 107 (91.5%) | 146 (64.6%) | |
| CA19-9 (ng/ml) | <.01 | ||
| ≥38 | 50 (42.7%) | 44 (19.5%) | |
| <38 | 67 (57.3%) | 182 (80.5%) | |
The survival analysis of CRC patients.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||
| n | 5-yr OS rate | HR | 95%CI | |||
| Age (yr) | .88 | |||||
| ≥60 | 153 | 66.8% | ||||
| <60 | 190 | 72.3% | ||||
| Gender | . 24 | |||||
| Male | 211 | 72.5% | ||||
| Female | 132 | 71.8% | ||||
| Tumor site | .41 | |||||
| Colon | 127 | 70.6% | ||||
| Rectum | 216 | 69.5% | ||||
| Tumor size (cm) | .16 | |||||
| ≥5 | 126 | 69.3% | ||||
| <5 | 217 | 72.8% | ||||
| Tumor invasion depth | .56 | |||||
| T1+T2 | 181 | 75.7% | ||||
| T3+T4 | 162 | 69.6% | ||||
| Lymph node involvement | .01 | |||||
| N0 | 139 | 74.8% | ||||
| N1 | 204 | 67.3% | ||||
| Clinical Stage | .03 | 4.37 | 3.98–12.33 | <.01 | ||
| I+II | 150 | 75.3% | ||||
| III | 203 | 64.2% | ||||
| Pathological differentiation | .03 | 1.28 | 1.01–6.63 | .01 | ||
| Well/Moderate | 208 | 76.2% | ||||
| Poor | 135 | 65.1% | ||||
| MiR-449a | .03 | 2.56 | 1.15–8.63 | <.01 | ||
| low | 226 | 67.4% | ||||
| high | 117 | 76.9% | ||||
| CEA (ng/ml) | <.01 | |||||
| ≥5 | 90 | 65.4% | ||||
| <5 | 253 | 75.8% | ||||
| CA19–9 (ng/ml) | <.01 | 2.15 | 1.02–8.88 | .02 | ||
| ≥38 | 94 | 64.3% | ||||
| <38 | 249 | 76.1% | ||||
Figure 3Lower circulating miR-449a level was associated with worse prognosis for colorectal cancer. The prognostic analysis revealed that a low miR-449a level was significantly associated with a worse 5-year overall survival rate (P = .03).