Literature DB >> 33845854

Aspartame and cancer - new evidence for causation.

Philip J Landrigan1,2,3, Kurt Straif4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aspartame is one of the world's most widely used artificial sweeteners and is an ingredient in more than 5000 food products globally. A particularly important use is in low-calorie beverages consumed by children and pregnant women. The Ramazzini Institute (RI) reported in 2006 and 2007 that aspartame causes dose-related increases in malignant tumors in multiple organs in rats and mice. Increased cancer risk was seen even at low exposure levels approaching the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI). Prenatal exposures caused increased malignancies in rodent offspring at lower doses than in adults. These findings generated intense controversy focused on the accuracy of RI's diagnoses of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissue tumors (HLTs). Critics made the claim that pulmonary lesions observed in aspartame-exposed animals were inflammatory lesions caused by Mycoplasma infection rather than malignant neoplasms.
METHODS: To address this question, RI subjected all HLTs from aspartame-exposed animals to immunohistochemical analysis using a battery of markers and to morphological reassessment using the most recent Internationally Harmonized Nomenclature and Diagnostic (INHAND) criteria.
FINDINGS: This immunohistochemical and morphological re-evaluation confirmed the original diagnoses of malignancy in 92.3% of cases. Six lesions originally diagnosed as lymphoma (8% of all HLTs) were reclassified: 3 to lymphoid hyperplasia, and 3 to chronic inflammation with fibrosis. There was no evidence of Mycoplasma infection.
INTERPRETATION: These new findings confirm that aspartame is a chemical carcinogen in rodents. They confirm the very worrisome finding that prenatal exposure to aspartame increases cancer risk in rodent offspring. They validate the conclusions of the original RI studies. These findings are of great importance for public health. In light of them, we encourage all national and international public health agencies to urgently reexamine their assessments of aspartame's health risks - especially the risks of prenatal and early postnatal exposures. We call upon food agencies to reassess Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) levels for aspartame. We note that an Advisory Group to the International Agency for Research on Cancer has recommended high-priority reevaluation of aspartame's carcinogenicity to humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial sweetener; Aspartame; Cancer; Carcinogenicity; Leukemia; Pulmonary lymphoma; Ramazzini institute; Tumors

Year:  2021        PMID: 33845854     DOI: 10.1186/s12940-021-00725-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health        ISSN: 1476-069X            Impact factor:   5.984


  5 in total

Review 1.  Food additives in childhood: a review on consumption and health consequences.

Authors:  Mariana Vieira Dos Santos Kraemer; Ana Carolina Fernandes; Maria Cecília Cury Chaddad; Paula Lazzarin Uggioni; Vanessa Mello Rodrigues; Greyce Luci Bernardo; Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Response to the publication by Landrigan PJ, Straif K. Aspartame and cancer - new evidence causation.

Authors:  Ashley Roberts
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  Authors' response to Ashley Roberts' letter to the editor on aspartame and cancer.

Authors:  Philip J Landrigan; Kurt Straif
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 4.  Replacement of refined sugar by natural sweeteners: focus on potential health benefits.

Authors:  Shiza Arshad; Tahniat Rehman; Summaya Saif; Muhammad Shahid Riaz Rajoka; Muhammad Modassar Ali Nawaz Ranjha; Abdo Hassoun; Janna Cropotova; Monica Trif; Aqsa Younas; Rana Muhammad Aadil
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-20

5.  Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Charlotte Debras; Eloi Chazelas; Bernard Srour; Nathalie Druesne-Pecollo; Younes Esseddik; Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi; Cédric Agaësse; Alexandre De Sa; Rebecca Lutchia; Stéphane Gigandet; Inge Huybrechts; Chantal Julia; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Benjamin Allès; Valentina A Andreeva; Pilar Galan; Serge Hercberg; Mélanie Deschasaux-Tanguy; Mathilde Touvier
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 11.069

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.