Soha El-Halabi1, Ronan McCabe2, Birger C Forsberg2, Devy L Elling3, Ziad El-Khatib2,4,5. 1. Department of Learning Informatics Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. soha.el.halabi@ki.se. 2. Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 4. Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 5. World Health Programme, Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT), Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally, women constitute 30% of researchers. Despite an increasing proportion of women in research, they are still less likely to have international collaborations. Literature on barriers to knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) between men and women remains limited. This study aimed to assess perceived gender barriers to KTE activities in vaccination-related research in low-, middle- and high-income countries. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional data assessment from a self-administered questionnaire distributed to researchers in the field of vaccination research. The administered questionnaire was developed and validated by WHO and McMaster University. Descriptive statistics were carried out. Structural factors of KTE were assessed using 12 statements measured with a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). An index ranging from 12 to 60 points was created to assess structural factors of KTE, with higher score indicating fewer perceived barriers. Multivariable linear regression modelling was applied to examine the association between KTE barriers and gender. RESULTS: A total of 158 researchers were included in the analysis. Regardless of gender and country of affiliation, researchers experienced challenges with respect to KTE activities; particularly factors related to the availability of human and financial resources and level of technical expertise among their target audience. We were also able to identify perceived facilitators among men and women, such as the presence of structures that link researchers and target audiences, the investment of target audiences in KTE efforts and the presence of stable contacts among target audiences. Our linear regression analysis showed that women perceived more barriers than men (R2 = 0.014; B = -1.069; 95% CI -4.035; 1.897). CONCLUSIONS: Men and women shared common perspectives on barriers to KTE. KTE activities could be strengthened by improving structural efforts to reduce gender differences and increase collaborations between researchers and their target audience.
BACKGROUND: Globally, women constitute 30% of researchers. Despite an increasing proportion of women in research, they are still less likely to have international collaborations. Literature on barriers to knowledge transfer and exchange (KTE) between men and women remains limited. This study aimed to assess perceived gender barriers to KTE activities in vaccination-related research in low-, middle- and high-income countries. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional data assessment from a self-administered questionnaire distributed to researchers in the field of vaccination research. The administered questionnaire was developed and validated by WHO and McMaster University. Descriptive statistics were carried out. Structural factors of KTE were assessed using 12 statements measured with a five-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). An index ranging from 12 to 60 points was created to assess structural factors of KTE, with higher score indicating fewer perceived barriers. Multivariable linear regression modelling was applied to examine the association between KTE barriers and gender. RESULTS: A total of 158 researchers were included in the analysis. Regardless of gender and country of affiliation, researchers experienced challenges with respect to KTE activities; particularly factors related to the availability of human and financial resources and level of technical expertise among their target audience. We were also able to identify perceived facilitators among men and women, such as the presence of structures that link researchers and target audiences, the investment of target audiences in KTE efforts and the presence of stable contacts among target audiences. Our linear regression analysis showed that women perceived more barriers than men (R2 = 0.014; B = -1.069; 95% CI -4.035; 1.897). CONCLUSIONS:Men and women shared common perspectives on barriers to KTE. KTE activities could be strengthened by improving structural efforts to reduce gender differences and increase collaborations between researchers and their target audience.
Entities:
Keywords:
Barriers; Evidence-informed practice; Gender; Knowledge transfer and exchange; Research utilization
Authors: A Takla; O Wichmann; P Carrillo-Santisteve; S Cotter; D Levy-Bruhl; I Paradowska-Stankiewicz; P Valentiner-Branth; F D'Ancona Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2015-03-05
Authors: Anna Taddio; Vibhuti Shah; Eman Leung; Jane Wang; Chaitya Parikh; Sarah Smart; Ross Hetherington; Moshe Ipp; Rebecca Pillai Riddell; Michael Sgro; Aleksandra Jovicic; Linda Franck Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 2.125