Literature DB >> 33845764

Long-term TE persistence even without beneficial insertion.

Stefan C Kremer1, Stefan Linquist2, Brent Saylor3, Tyler A Elliott4, T Ryan Gregory3, Karl Cottenie3.   

Abstract

This correspondence responds to the critique by Butler et al. (BMC Genomics 22:241, 2021) of our recent paper on transposable element (TE) persistence. We address the three main objections raised by Butler et al. After running a series of additional simulations that were inspired by the authors' criticisms, we are able to present a more nuanced understanding of the conditions that generate long-term persistence.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33845764     DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07568-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  4 in total

1.  Long-term evolution of transposable elements.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaud S Boutin; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence for positive selection on recent human transposable element insertions.

Authors:  Lavanya Rishishwar; Lu Wang; Jianrong Wang; Soojin V Yi; Joseph Lachance; I King Jordan
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 3.  The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Transposable element persistence via potential genome-level ecosystem engineering.

Authors:  Stefan C Kremer; Stefan Linquist; Brent Saylor; Tyler A Elliott; T Ryan Gregory; Karl Cottenie
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.969

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.