| Literature DB >> 3384530 |
Abstract
The infant mortality rate is not a good indicator of overall mortality or health status. Based on new empirical life tables from the UN Population Division, it can only predict life expectancy with 95% confidence to within a 14-year range. Two infant mortality rates must be nearly 80 units apart to be 95% confident that life expectancy in the two communities is different. Life expectancy itself is not an ideal general measure of mortality, because it implicitly weights deaths at different ages in an inconsistent fashion. A measure of potential years of life lost is preferable because it is ethically more consistent.Entities:
Keywords: Comparative Studies; Data Analysis; Demographic Analysis; Demographic Factors; Demographics; Demography; Developing Countries; Differential Mortality; Infant Mortality; Length Of Life; Life Expectancy; Life Table Method; Life Tables; Mortality; Population; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; Social Sciences; Studies
Mesh:
Year: 1988 PMID: 3384530 DOI: 10.1093/ije/17.1.122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Epidemiol ISSN: 0300-5771 Impact factor: 7.196