OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which therapeutic processes - working alliance and depth of experiencing - contributed to outcome. METHOD: Individual differences in these processes were examined at the early and working phases to determine their impact on symptom reduction. An archival data set of N = 42 individuals who underwent emotion-focused therapy for trauma for childhood maltreatment was used to examine the differential quality of client processes throughout treatment. RESULTS: For those who had difficulty forming an alliance early in therapy, alliance scores during the working phase were the best predictor of outcome (β = -.42). This was complemented by a process change of improvement in alliance from the early to working phases (d = 1.0). In contrast, for those who had difficulty engaging in deepened experiencing early in therapy, depth of experiencing in the working phase was the best predictor of outcome (β = -.36). This was complemented by an improvement in depth of experiencing from the early to working phases (d = .69). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that focusing on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy contributes to the best treatment outcome. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Sometimes early treatment sessions reveal an abundance of one kind of processing but limitations to another, which poses a puzzle for treatment planning. Our findings suggest that within the first four sessions, therapists could develop tailored treatments based on the relative presence or absence of critical therapeutic changes processes. When it becomes evident that therapy is progressing with a weaker alliance between client and therapist, therapists should redouble their efforts in alliance-building. However, when therapy is developing in a fashion that lacks deep emotional experiencing on the part of the client, treatment efforts should aim to facilitate a richer exploration of moment-by-moment experience. As such, our findings suggest relying on the existing processing strengths within a dyad (e.g., emphasis on an already strong relationships, or augmenting an existing aptitude for deeper experiencing) while shortcomings exist in another kind of process is not optimal responding. Therapists should focus their work on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy to facilitate the best treatment outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which therapeutic processes - working alliance and depth of experiencing - contributed to outcome. METHOD: Individual differences in these processes were examined at the early and working phases to determine their impact on symptom reduction. An archival data set of N = 42 individuals who underwent emotion-focused therapy for trauma for childhood maltreatment was used to examine the differential quality of client processes throughout treatment. RESULTS: For those who had difficulty forming an alliance early in therapy, alliance scores during the working phase were the best predictor of outcome (β = -.42). This was complemented by a process change of improvement in alliance from the early to working phases (d = 1.0). In contrast, for those who had difficulty engaging in deepened experiencing early in therapy, depth of experiencing in the working phase was the best predictor of outcome (β = -.36). This was complemented by an improvement in depth of experiencing from the early to working phases (d = .69). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study suggest that focusing on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy contributes to the best treatment outcome. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Sometimes early treatment sessions reveal an abundance of one kind of processing but limitations to another, which poses a puzzle for treatment planning. Our findings suggest that within the first four sessions, therapists could develop tailored treatments based on the relative presence or absence of critical therapeutic changes processes. When it becomes evident that therapy is progressing with a weaker alliance between client and therapist, therapists should redouble their efforts in alliance-building. However, when therapy is developing in a fashion that lacks deep emotional experiencing on the part of the client, treatment efforts should aim to facilitate a richer exploration of moment-by-moment experience. As such, our findings suggest relying on the existing processing strengths within a dyad (e.g., emphasis on an already strong relationships, or augmenting an existing aptitude for deeper experiencing) while shortcomings exist in another kind of process is not optimal responding. Therapists should focus their work on the process that clients have trouble with early in therapy to facilitate the best treatment outcome.