Literature DB >> 33844845

Red meat consumption, cooking mutagens, NAT1/2 genotypes and pancreatic cancer risk in two ethnically diverse prospective cohorts.

Brian Z Huang1,2, Songren Wang1, David Bogumil1, Lynne R Wilkens3, Lang Wu3, William J Blot4, Wei Zheng4, Xiao-Ou Shu4, Stephen J Pandol5, Loïc Le Marchand3, Veronica Wendy Setiawan1,6.   

Abstract

There is limited evidence on the association between red meat consumption and pancreatic cancer among ethnic minorities. We assessed this relationship in two large prospective cohorts: the Multiethnic Cohort Study (MEC) and the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). Demographic, dietary and other risk factor data were collected at cohort entry. Red meat intake was assessed using cohort-specific validated food frequency questionnaires. Incident pancreatic cancer cases were identified via linkages to state cancer registries. Cox regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of red meat intake with pancreatic cancer risk in each cohort. We performed additional analyses to evaluate cooking methods, mutagens and effect modification by NAT1/2 genotypes. From a total of 184 542 (MEC) and 66 793 (SCCS) at-risk participants, we identified 1618 (MEC) and 266 (SCCS) incident pancreatic cancer cases. Red meat consumption was associated with pancreatic cancer risk in the MEC (RRQ4vsQ1 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37) and with borderline statistical significance in the SCCS (RRQ4vsQ1 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.86). This association was significant in African Americans (RRQ4vsQ1 1.49, 95% CI 1.06-2.11) and Latinos (RRQ4vsQ1 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.04) in the MEC, and among African Americans (RRQ4vsQ1 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.33) in the SCCS. NAT2 genotypes appeared to modify the relationship between red meat and pancreatic cancer in the MEC (pinteraction = 0.03). Our findings suggest that the associations for red meat may be strongest in African Americans and Latinos. The mechanisms underlying the increased risk for these populations should be further investigated.
© 2021 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort; diet; epidemiology; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844845      PMCID: PMC8594451          DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.316


  38 in total

1.  Prospective study of diet and pancreatic cancer in male smokers.

Authors:  Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; Pirjo Pietinen; Philip R Taylor; Jarmo Virtamo; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Dietary food groups intake and cooking methods associations with pancreatic cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Zeinab Ghorbani; Azita Hekmatdoost; Hassan Eini Zinab; Solmaz Farrokhzad; Roya Rahimi; Reza Malekzadeh; Akram Pourshams
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Red meat intake, NAT2, and risk of colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 11 studies.

Authors:  Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Mengmeng Du; Sonja I Berndt; Hermann Brenner; Bette J Caan; Graham Casey; Jenny Chang-Claude; David Duggan; Charles S Fuchs; Steven Gallinger; Edward L Giovannucci; Tabitha A Harrison; Richard B Hayes; Michael Hoffmeister; John L Hopper; Lifang Hou; Li Hsu; Mark A Jenkins; Peter Kraft; Jing Ma; Hongmei Nan; Polly A Newcomb; Shuji Ogino; John D Potter; Daniela Seminara; Martha L Slattery; Mark Thornquist; Emily White; Kana Wu; Ulrike Peters; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Meat, fish, poultry and egg consumption in relation to risk of pancreatic cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Susanna C Larsson; Niclas Håkanson; Johan Permert; Alicja Wolk
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Accuracy of various human NAT2 SNP genotyping panels to infer rapid, intermediate and slow acetylator phenotypes.

Authors:  David W Hein; Mark A Doll
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.533

6.  Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods.

Authors:  Sayantan Das; Lukas Forer; Sebastian Schönherr; Carlo Sidore; Adam E Locke; Alan Kwong; Scott I Vrieze; Emily Y Chew; Shawn Levy; Matt McGue; David Schlessinger; Dwight Stambolian; Po-Ru Loh; William G Iacono; Anand Swaroop; Laura J Scott; Francesco Cucca; Florian Kronenberg; Michael Boehnke; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Christian Fuchsberger
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Meat consumption, heterocyclic amines, NAT2, and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura I Mignone; Edward Giovannucci; Polly A Newcomb; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; E John Orav; Walter C Willett; Kathleen M Egan
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Are meat and heme iron intake associated with pancreatic cancer? Results from the NIH-AARP diet and health cohort.

Authors:  Pulkit Taunk; Eric Hecht; Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Meat and heterocyclic amine intake, smoking, NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk in the multiethnic cohort study.

Authors:  Ute Nöthlings; Jennifer F Yamamoto; Lynne R Wilkens; Suzanne P Murphy; Song-Yi Park; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Loïc Le Marchand
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Integrating sequence and array data to create an improved 1000 Genomes Project haplotype reference panel.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.