Literature DB >> 33844587

Lingual Exercise in Older Veterans With Dysphagia: A Pilot Investigation of Patient Adherence.

Brittany N Krekeler1,2,3, Joanne Yee4,5, Sarah Daggett4, Glen Leverson2, Nicole Rogus-Pulia1,2,5,6.   

Abstract

Purpose Adherence is a concern in dysphagia management. Poor adherence with recommendations can negatively affect treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. For exercise-based therapies, low adherence can alter the dose of exercise delivered to the muscle, which can diminish impact of exercise. It has been established that low adherence is a problem in dysphagia treatments; however, relationships among levels of adherence and outcomes from exercise-based interventions have not been explored. Method In this retrospective pilot study, data were collected from a multicenter clinical demonstration program in the Veterans Affairs hospital system to examine the relationships between patient adherence with a device-facilitated lingual exercise regimen. Outcomes were compared pre- and posttreatment using a paired t test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, and relationships among adherence and outcome measures were evaluated using Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients, as appropriate. Results Patient adherence was evenly distributed across participants: Adherence at the front sensor was 59.3% (SD = 28.2), ranging from 5.5% to 95.8%; the back sensor adherence was 55.9% (SD = 29.8), ranging from 1.1% to 97.2%. Maximum isometric pressure (MIP) generation, at both the front and back sensors, was increased from pre- to posttreatment (p < .0001, front; p = .008, back). Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores were also significantly improved at the posttreatment time point as compared to baseline (p = .005). However, there were no significant correlations among adherence and outcome measures (front sensor adherence vs. ΔMIP, r = -.161, p = .342; back sensor adherence vs. ΔMIP, r = .002, p = .991; front sensor adherence vs. ΔFOIS, r = -.183, p = .279; back sensor adherence vs. ΔFOIS, r = -.160, p = .399). Conclusions These findings suggest that patient adherence with this lingual exercise program was not related to the increases in lingual pressure generation or improvement in functional oral intake observed in this cohort. These preliminary findings suggest the need for future, prospective, controlled, and randomized clinical trials to further investigate patient adherence with a lingual exercise program and related impacts of adherence on exercise dose and swallowing-related outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844587      PMCID: PMC8608159          DOI: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  43 in total

Review 1.  A dose-response relation between aerobic exercise and visceral fat reduction: systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  K Ohkawara; S Tanaka; M Miyachi; K Ishikawa-Takata; I Tabata
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 5.095

2.  The effects of tongue pressure strength and accuracy training on tongue pressure strength, swallowing function, and quality of life in subacute stroke patients with dysphagia: a preliminary randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Moon; Suk-Chan Hahm; Young Sik Won; Hwi-Young Cho
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 3.  Adherence in diabetes: can we define it and can we measure it?

Authors:  W L McNabb
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Effects of lingual strength training on oropharyngeal muscles in South Korean adults.

Authors:  Ji-Su Park; Na-Kyung Hwang; Hwan-Hee Kim; Jong-Bae Choi; Moon-Young Chang; Young-Jin Jung
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.837

5.  Tongue-Strengthening Exercises in Healthy Older Adults: Does Exercise Load Matter? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leen Van den Steen; Jan Vanderwegen; Cindy Guns; Rik Elen; Marc De Bodt; Gwen Van Nuffelen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Clinical biostatistics. XXX. Biostatistical problems in 'compliance bias'.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Movement of the hyoid bone and the epiglottis during swallowing in patients with dysphagia from different etiologies.

Authors:  Nam-Jong Paik; Sang Jun Kim; Ho Jun Lee; Jae Yong Jeon; Jae-Young Lim; Tai Ryoon Han
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment--MBSImp: establishing a standard.

Authors:  Bonnie Martin-Harris; Martin B Brodsky; Yvonne Michel; Donald O Castell; Melanie Schleicher; John Sandidge; Rebekah Maxwell; Julie Blair
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Dose in Exercise-Based Dysphagia Therapies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Brittany N Krekeler; Linda M Rowe; Nadine P Connor
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Effect of tongue strength training using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument in stroke patients with dysphagia.

Authors:  Ji-Su Park; Hee-Jeong Kim; Dong-Hwan Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.