Literature DB >> 33844413

Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Julia Xie1, Maansi S Vatsan1, Antonio Gangemi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Heller myotomy has been proposed as an alternative minimally invasive approach to traditional laparoscopy for the treatment of achalasia. This systematic review aims to compare the safety and post-operative outcomes of the two procedures.
METHODS: Systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE through Ovid, Scopus and Cochrane to identify clinical trials and retrospective analyses. Outcome measures used for meta-analysis included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, 30-day readmission, intraoperative oesophageal perforation, conversion, mortality, morbidity, symptom relief beyond 1 year, re-intervention for recurrent symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux during follow-up rates.
RESULTS: Seven studies were selected with a total of 3214 patients. The only factor to be statistically different is intraoperative oesophageal perforation rate, which is lower in robotic-assisted Heller myotomy compared to laparoscopic (odds ratio = 0.1139; 95% confidence interval [0.0334, 0.3887]; p = 0.0005).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a robotic approach is associated with improved patient safety.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heller myotomy; achalasia; laparoscopy; meta-analysis; minimal invasive surgery; robotic-assisted laparoscopy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844413     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  2 in total

Review 1.  The Evolution of the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: From the Open to the Minimally Invasive Approach.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Fernando A M Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Robotic Surgery: Rediscovering Human Anatomy.

Authors:  Antonio Gangemi; Betty Chang; Paolo Bernante; Gilberto Poggioli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.