Stephen George1, Subaraman Ramchandran2, Alexander Mihas3, Kevin George3, Ali Mansour1, Thomas Errico1. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Spinal Disorders, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, 33155, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Center for Spinal Disorders, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, 33155, USA. subbu_gsmc@yahoo.co.in. 3. Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of topical tranexamic acid (tTXA) in spinal deformity correction in AIS patients METHODS: Sixty consecutive operative AIS patients were reviewed from a single institution and divided into two groups with similar demographics. Standardized peri-operative blood salvage techniques were utilized in all 60 patients. In the latter 30 patients, tTXA soaked sponges (1 g mixed in 500 ml Normal Saline) was utilised for wound packing during the entire surgical procedure compared to dry sponges as used in the former 30 patients. Both the groups were compared for the magnitude of deformity corrected, EBL per level fused, total EBL, blood transfused, drain output and peri-operative events. RESULTS: Sixty AIS patients (mean age 14.4 yrs, 43 females, mean BMI 21.5, mean levels 10.7) were included. Both groups achieved similar change in Coronal Cobb correction. The EBVL (Estimated blood volume loss) % lost in the topical TXA group was 38% less than the control group (11.2 vs. 18.3%, p = 0.006). Similarly, the EBL/level was significantly lower in the topical TXA group (41 ± 30 ml vs. 57 ± 26 ml, p = 0.03). Three of 30 patients in the control group required at least 1 unit of blood transfusion, whereas only 1 patient in the topical TXA group required transfusion (10 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.001). No differences were noted in post-operative drain output, change in hemoglobin levels, and peri-operative complication rates. CONCLUSION: When used as an adjunct to the conventional blood salvage techniques in spinal deformity correction procedures, the use of tTXA resulted in reduced operative blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the use of topical tranexamic acid (tTXA) in spinal deformity correction in AISpatients METHODS: Sixty consecutive operative AISpatients were reviewed from a single institution and divided into two groups with similar demographics. Standardized peri-operative blood salvage techniques were utilized in all 60 patients. In the latter 30 patients, tTXA soaked sponges (1 g mixed in 500 ml Normal Saline) was utilised for wound packing during the entire surgical procedure compared to dry sponges as used in the former 30 patients. Both the groups were compared for the magnitude of deformity corrected, EBL per level fused, total EBL, blood transfused, drain output and peri-operative events. RESULTS: Sixty AISpatients (mean age 14.4 yrs, 43 females, mean BMI 21.5, mean levels 10.7) were included. Both groups achieved similar change in Coronal Cobb correction. The EBVL (Estimated blood volume loss) % lost in the topical TXA group was 38% less than the control group (11.2 vs. 18.3%, p = 0.006). Similarly, the EBL/level was significantly lower in the topical TXA group (41 ± 30 ml vs. 57 ± 26 ml, p = 0.03). Three of 30 patients in the control group required at least 1 unit of blood transfusion, whereas only 1 patient in the topical TXA group required transfusion (10 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.001). No differences were noted in post-operative drain output, change in hemoglobin levels, and peri-operative complication rates. CONCLUSION: When used as an adjunct to the conventional blood salvage techniques in spinal deformity correction procedures, the use of tTXA resulted in reduced operative blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements.
Authors: Marios G Lykissas; Alvin H Crawford; Gilbert Chan; Lori A Aronson; Mohammed J Al-Sayyad Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Christopher M Blanchette; Peter F Wang; Ashish V Joshi; Mikael Asmussen; William Saunders; Peter Kruse Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 3.134