Literature DB >> 33844110

Are all ALK variants created equal? Clinicopathologic features and outcomes: a propensity-matched study.

Ullas Batra1, Mansi Sharma2, Shrinidhi Nathany3, Parveen Jain2, Satyajeet Soni, Anurag Mehta4.   

Abstract

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged NSCLC comprises a molecularly distinct subgroup occurring in 10% cases. Various EML4-ALK and non EML4 variants are known to occur which can be detected only on NGS and show differential TKI responses. 113 ALK-IHC positive cases were subjected to a custom panel-based NGS for detection of ALK variants. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes were studied and propensity-matched analysis was done. The median age of the overall cohort was 53 years. 91 (80.5%) cases were NGS positive, the most common being EML4-ALK (90, 98.9%) cases. The most common EML4 variant was Variant 1 (40, 35%) cases, Variant 3 (28, 25%) cases, and Variant 2 (17, 15%) cases. One novel EML4-ALK variant was also encountered which was found to be intrinsically resistant to crizotinib. On pre-weight-adjusted comparison, Variant 1 group had a higher occurrence of brain and extrathoracic metastases. The median OS was 44 months for the entire cohort. 49 patients received crizotinib as first-line TKI. Among these, the median OS for Variant 2 was not reached; it was 38 months and 24 months for Variant 1 and Variant 3, respectively. The median PFS for crizotinib treated patients was 8.3 months (Variant 2: 11 months, Variant 1: 8 months, and Variant 3: 9 months). On propensity-matched analyses, there was no difference in OS and PFS between Variant 1 and Variant 3, with higher HR for Variant 3. We present a large data set evaluating clinical and outcome differences between ALK variants. The unique standpoint of this study involves the propensity-weighted model to account for differences among the groups, with no prognostic differences between Variant 1 and Variant 3, which is distinct from literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALK variants; Crizotinib; NGS; Propensity matching

Year:  2021        PMID: 33844110     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01916-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  5 in total

1.  Variability in lung cancer response to ALK inhibitors cannot be explained by the diversity of ALK fusion variants.

Authors:  Natalia V Mitiushkina; Vladislav I Tiurin; Aglaya G Iyevleva; Maxim M Kholmatov; Elena A Filippova; Fedor V Moiseyenko; Nikita E Levchenko; Ivan S Sardaryan; Svetlana V Odintsova; Alexandra M Lozhkina; Nikita M Volkov; Nina A Karaseva; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Sergey V Orlov; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.079

2.  Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Soda; Young Lim Choi; Munehiro Enomoto; Shuji Takada; Yoshihiro Yamashita; Shunpei Ishikawa; Shin-ichiro Fujiwara; Hideki Watanabe; Kentaro Kurashina; Hisashi Hatanaka; Masashi Bando; Shoji Ohno; Yuichi Ishikawa; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Toshiro Niki; Yasunori Sohara; Yukihiko Sugiyama; Hiroyuki Mano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  When the Loss Costs Too Much: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Sarcopenia in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Xin Hua; Shan Liu; Jun-Fang Liao; Wen Wen; Zhi-Qing Long; Zi-Jian Lu; Ling Guo; Huan-Xin Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Exploratory analysis of introducing next-generation sequencing-based method to treatment-naive lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Yufang Feng; Gaohua Feng; Xiaoling Lu; Wenxia Qian; Junyi Ye; Carmen Areses Manrique; Chunping Ma; Yadong Lu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  COSMIC: the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer.

Authors:  John G Tate; Sally Bamford; Harry C Jubb; Zbyslaw Sondka; David M Beare; Nidhi Bindal; Harry Boutselakis; Charlotte G Cole; Celestino Creatore; Elisabeth Dawson; Peter Fish; Bhavana Harsha; Charlie Hathaway; Steve C Jupe; Chai Yin Kok; Kate Noble; Laura Ponting; Christopher C Ramshaw; Claire E Rye; Helen E Speedy; Ray Stefancsik; Sam L Thompson; Shicai Wang; Sari Ward; Peter J Campbell; Simon A Forbes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Targeting ALK Rearrangements in NSCLC: Current State of the Art.

Authors:  Ling Peng; Liping Zhu; Yilan Sun; Justin Stebbing; Giovanni Selvaggi; Yongchang Zhang; Zhentao Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.