Daniel Allington1, Siobhan McAndrew2, Vivienne Moxham-Hall3, Bobby Duffy3. 1. Digital Humanities, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK. 2. School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies, University of Bristol, BristolBS8 1TU. 3. Policy Institute, King's College London, LondonWC2R 2LS.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy presents an obstacle to the campaign to control COVID-19. It has previously been found to be associated with youth, female gender, low income, low education, low medical trust, minority ethnic group membership, low perceived risk from COVID-19, use of certain social media platforms and conspiracy beliefs. However, it is unclear which of these predictors might explain variance associated with others. METHODS: An online survey was conducted with a representative sample of 4343 UK residents, aged 18-75, between 21 November and 21 December 2020. Predictors of vaccine hesitancy were assessed using linear rank-order models. RESULTS: Coronavirus vaccine hesitancy is associated with youth, female gender, low income, low education, high informational reliance on social media, low informational reliance on print and broadcast media, membership of other than white ethnic groups, low perceived risk from COVID-19 and low trust in scientists and medics, as well as (to a much lesser extent) low trust in government. Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions and general vaccine attitudes appear uniquely predictive, jointly explaining 35% of variance. Following controls for these variables, effects associated with trust, ethnicity and social media reliance largely or completely disappear, whereas the effect associated with education is reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening positive attitudes to vaccination and reducing conspiracy suspicions with regards to the coronavirus may have a positive effect on vaccine uptake, especially among ethnic groups with heightened vaccine hesitancy. However, vaccine hesitancy associated with age and gender does not appear to be explained by other predictor variables tested here.
BACKGROUND: Vaccine hesitancy presents an obstacle to the campaign to control COVID-19. It has previously been found to be associated with youth, female gender, low income, low education, low medical trust, minority ethnic group membership, low perceived risk from COVID-19, use of certain social media platforms and conspiracy beliefs. However, it is unclear which of these predictors might explain variance associated with others. METHODS: An online survey was conducted with a representative sample of 4343 UK residents, aged 18-75, between 21 November and 21 December 2020. Predictors of vaccine hesitancy were assessed using linear rank-order models. RESULTS:Coronavirus vaccine hesitancy is associated with youth, female gender, low income, low education, high informational reliance on social media, low informational reliance on print and broadcast media, membership of other than white ethnic groups, low perceived risk from COVID-19 and low trust in scientists and medics, as well as (to a much lesser extent) low trust in government. Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions and general vaccine attitudes appear uniquely predictive, jointly explaining 35% of variance. Following controls for these variables, effects associated with trust, ethnicity and social media reliance largely or completely disappear, whereas the effect associated with education is reversed. CONCLUSIONS: Strengthening positive attitudes to vaccination and reducing conspiracy suspicions with regards to the coronavirus may have a positive effect on vaccine uptake, especially among ethnic groups with heightened vaccine hesitancy. However, vaccine hesitancy associated with age and gender does not appear to be explained by other predictor variables tested here.
Authors: Cristina Zarbo; Valentina Candini; Clarissa Ferrari; Miriam d'Addazio; Gemma Calamandrei; Fabrizio Starace; Marta Caserotti; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Lorella Lotto; Alessandra Tasso; Manuel Zamparini; Giovanni de Girolamo Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-04-29
Authors: Christina E Farhart; Ella Douglas-Durham; Krissy Lunz Trujillo; Joseph A Vitriol Journal: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 3.622
Authors: Kathleen Hall Jamieson; Daniel Romer; Patrick E Jamieson; Kenneth M Winneg; Josh Pasek Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Will Jennings; Gerry Stoker; Hannah Bunting; Viktor Orri Valgarðsson; Jennifer Gaskell; Daniel Devine; Lawrence McKay; Melinda C Mills Journal: Vaccines (Basel) Date: 2021-06-03