| Literature DB >> 33843048 |
Bhaskar C Kolla1, Nurul A A Halim2, Qing Cao3, Zohar Sachs1, Erica Warlick1, Daniel Weisdorf1, Aloysius Y L Ho2, Wong G Chuan2, Zhentang Lao2, Fiona He1.
Abstract
Following the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, we changed our practice from using high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC-3 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5) to intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-1·5 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5/D1-3) for consolidation in young(<60 years) favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients. We assessed the clinical impact of this practice change. Of 80 patients, 51 received HIDAC prior to the protocol change, and subsequently, 29 received IDAC. The three-year risk of relapse was significantly higher with IDAC [61%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 40-82] compared with HIDAC (22%; 10-34), P < 0·01. Our findings suggest HIDAC, rather than IDAC, is the preferred dose for single-agent cytarabine consolidation in young, favourable-risk AML following 7+3 induction.Entities:
Keywords: acute leukaemia; chemotherapy; consolidation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33843048 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Haematol ISSN: 0007-1048 Impact factor: 6.998