Literature DB >> 33843048

High risk of relapse with intermediate dose cytarabine for consolidation in young favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia patients following induction with 7+3: a retrospective multicentre analysis and critical review of the literature.

Bhaskar C Kolla1, Nurul A A Halim2, Qing Cao3, Zohar Sachs1, Erica Warlick1, Daniel Weisdorf1, Aloysius Y L Ho2, Wong G Chuan2, Zhentang Lao2, Fiona He1.   

Abstract

Following the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, we changed our practice from using high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC-3 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5) to intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-1·5 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5/D1-3) for consolidation in young(<60 years) favourable-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients. We assessed the clinical impact of this practice change. Of 80 patients, 51 received HIDAC prior to the protocol change, and subsequently, 29 received IDAC. The three-year risk of relapse was significantly higher with IDAC [61%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 40-82] compared with HIDAC (22%; 10-34), P < 0·01. Our findings suggest HIDAC, rather than IDAC, is the preferred dose for single-agent cytarabine consolidation in young, favourable-risk AML following 7+3 induction.
© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute leukaemia; chemotherapy; consolidation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33843048     DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  1 in total

1.  Outcomes of HIDAC 18 g Versus IDAC 9 g in Consolidation Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Dinesh Ravikumar; Honey Saju; Amit Choudary; Arnab Bhattacharjee; Biswajit Dubashi; Prasanth Ganesan; Smita Kayal
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 0.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.