OBJECTIVES: Understanding racial/ethnic disparities in late-life cognitive health is a public health imperative. We used baseline data from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study to examine how age, education, gender, and clinical diagnosis, a proxy for brain health, are associated with cross-sectional measures of cognition in diverse racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Comprehensive measures of cognition were obtained using the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales and the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery in a sample of 1,695 KHANDLE participants (Asians 24%, Blacks 26%, Latinos 20%, Whites 29%). A 25% random subsample was clinically evaluated and diagnosed with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia. Cognitive test scores were regressed on core demographic variables and diagnosis in the combined sample and in multiple group analyses stratified by racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Race/ethnicity and education were variably associated with test scores with strongest associations with tests of vocabulary and semantic memory. Older age was associated with poorer performance on all measures, and gender differences varied across cognitive tests. Clinical diagnosis of MCI or dementia was associated with average decrements in test scores that ranged from -0.41 to -0.84 SD, with largest differences on tests of executive function and episodic memory. With few exceptions, associations of demographic variables and clinical diagnosis did not differ across racial/ethnic groups. DISCUSSION: The robust associations of cognitive test results with clinical diagnosis independent of core demographic variables and race/ethnicity support the validity of cognitive tests as indicators for brain health in diverse older adults.
OBJECTIVES: Understanding racial/ethnic disparities in late-life cognitive health is a public health imperative. We used baseline data from the Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) study to examine how age, education, gender, and clinical diagnosis, a proxy for brain health, are associated with cross-sectional measures of cognition in diverse racial/ethnic groups. METHODS: Comprehensive measures of cognition were obtained using the Spanish and English Neuropsychological Assessment Scales and the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery in a sample of 1,695 KHANDLE participants (Asians 24%, Blacks 26%, Latinos 20%, Whites 29%). A 25% random subsample was clinically evaluated and diagnosed with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or dementia. Cognitive test scores were regressed on core demographic variables and diagnosis in the combined sample and in multiple group analyses stratified by racial/ethnic group. RESULTS: Race/ethnicity and education were variably associated with test scores with strongest associations with tests of vocabulary and semantic memory. Older age was associated with poorer performance on all measures, and gender differences varied across cognitive tests. Clinical diagnosis of MCI or dementia was associated with average decrements in test scores that ranged from -0.41 to -0.84 SD, with largest differences on tests of executive function and episodic memory. With few exceptions, associations of demographic variables and clinical diagnosis did not differ across racial/ethnic groups. DISCUSSION: The robust associations of cognitive test results with clinical diagnosis independent of core demographic variables and race/ethnicity support the validity of cognitive tests as indicators for brain health in diverse older adults.
Authors: Rebecca J Melrose; Paul Brewster; María J Marquine; Anna MacKay-Brandt; Bruce Reed; Sarah T Farias; Dan Mungas Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2014-01-03 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Stefan Walter; Carole Dufouil; Alden L Gross; Richard N Jones; Dan Mungas; Teresa J Filshtein; Jennifer J Manly; Thalida E Arpawong; M Maria Glymour Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2019 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Anders M Fjell; Linda McEvoy; Dominic Holland; Anders M Dale; Kristine B Walhovd Journal: Prog Neurobiol Date: 2014-02-16 Impact factor: 11.685
Authors: Kharine R Jean; Cutter A Lindbergh; Catherine M Mewborn; Talia L Robinson; Marissa A Gogniat; L Stephen Miller Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Melissa Castora-Binkley; Carol L Peronto; Jerri D Edwards; Brent J Small Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Kristen M George; Rachel L Peterson; Paola Gilsanz; Lisa L Barnes; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda; M Maria Glymour; Dan M Mungas; Charles S DeCarli; Rachel A Whitmer Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Taylor M Mobley; Dan Mungas; Marissa J Seamans; M Maria Glymour; Paola Gilsanz; Charles DeCarli; Rachel A Whitmer; Elizabeth Rose Mayeda Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 16.655