Interlaced metallic meshes form a class of three-dimensional metamaterials that exhibit nondispersive, broadband modes at low frequencies, without the low frequency cutoff typical of generic wire grid geometries. However, the experimental observation of these modes has remained an open challenge, both due to the difficulties in fabricating such complex structures and also because the broadband mode is longitudinal and does not couple to free-space radiation (dark mode). Here we report the first experimental observation of the low frequency modes in a block of interlaced meshes fabricated through 3D printing. We demonstrate how the addition of monopole antennas to opposing faces of one of the meshes enables coupling of a plane wave to the low frequency "dark mode" and use this to obtain the dispersion of the mode. In addition, we utilize orthogonal antennas on opposite faces to achieve polarization rotation as well as phase shifting of radiation passing through the structure. Our work paves the way toward further experimental study into interlaced meshes and other complex 3D metamaterials.
Interlaced metallic meshes form a class of three-dimensional metamaterials that exhibit nondispersive, broadband modes at low frequencies, without the low frequency cutoff typical of generic wire grid geometries. However, the experimental observation of these modes has remained an open challenge, both due to the difficulties in fabricating such complex structures and also because the broadband mode is longitudinal and does not couple to free-space radiation (dark mode). Here we report the first experimental observation of the low frequency modes in a block of interlaced meshes fabricated through 3D printing. We demonstrate how the addition of monopole antennas to opposing faces of one of the meshes enables coupling of a plane wave to the low frequency "dark mode" and use this to obtain the dispersion of the mode. In addition, we utilize orthogonal antennas on opposite faces to achieve polarization rotation as well as phase shifting of radiation passing through the structure. Our work paves the way toward further experimental study into interlaced meshes and other complex 3D metamaterials.
Three-dimensional structures constructed
from thin metal wires
have been central to the field of metamaterials since its origins.
One of the earliest key discoveries in the field was that a grid or
mesh of thin, electrically conductive wires behaves like a low density
plasma, or dilute metal, with a plasma frequency that is tunable via
the structural parameters of the grid.[1,2] This has been
fundamental for establishing negative-permittivity materials used
in the experiments that have brought metamaterials into the public
eye, leading to effects such as negative refraction,[3,4] spoof plasmons,[5−7] and cloaking.[8,9] However, beyond some
early proof-of-concept studies which only showed samples of a very
limited scale,[10,11] the difficulty of fabrication
of these grids has meant that they have received little experimental
attention.Recently there has been significant interest in more
complex wire
mesh structures, such as the case of multiple interlocking, but unconnected
meshes.[12−16] Theoretical investigations of these structures have shown that they
exhibit an unusual mode structure and do not display the low frequency
cutoff characteristic of the “dilute metal” single mesh,
but can support modes at arbitrarily low frequencies.[12,14,15] Additionally, these interlaced
meshes have shown the potential to behave as non-Maxwellian media,
a metamaterial where the effective medium described
in the low-frequency limit does not conform to Maxwell’s equations[12] (despite being formed of unit cells that do)
and affords new ways to control the dispersion of radiation traversing
a 3D material. This unusual behavior is seen to arise from the additional
degrees of freedom of the local field due to the proximity of multiple
unconnected meshes with different local electric potentials.[12] However, due to the unusual, lateral spatial
modulation of the modes supported, it appears almost impossible to
excite them via a plane wave. Latioui et al. showed that although
this was theoretically achievable under exceptional conditions (grazing
incidence and meshes with extreme difference in wire radius),[14] such conditions are not realistic for experimental
purposes. Additionally, as with the case of single meshes, it has
proven difficult to fabricate and experimentally investigate these
structures. However, in recent years, new advanced manufacturing techniques
such as 3D printing have revolutionized what it is now possible to
create, opening up the possibility of exploring these 3D interwoven
structures in the laboratory.In this study, we fabricate these
structures via selective laser
sintering (SLS) then metallization and resolve the issue of exciting
the low frequency dark modes of an interlaced mesh with free-space
radiation via the use of a monopole antenna array connected to one
of the grids.We first experimentally demonstrate the transmission
of microwaves
through the standard 3D single mesh and determine the dispersion of
the fundamental mode. We then characterize the use of an array of
monopole antennas to couple into a double interlaced mesh and utilize
this technique to transmit radiation through the mesh, and experimentally
determine the dispersion for the “dark mode”. Finally,
we demonstrate the possibility to achieve polarization rotation and
phase shifting using this antennae-coupled interlaced dark mode mesh.
Exploring
Single and Double Meshes
The basic structures of the single
and double cubic wire meshes
are shown in Figure a and b, respectively. In Figure c, it can be observed that the electric field within
the single mesh essentially remains polarized transverse to the wavevector,
and in this respect it is like a wave in free space as shown in Figure e, allowing the structure
to transmit effectively above the low-frequency cutoff determined
by the effective plasma frequency of the grid. The double mesh is
quite different, however: the polarization of the low frequency mode
is quasi-longitudinal (Figure d), with the spatially averaged electric field largely being
polarized in the same direction as the wavevector, k.
Thus, although there are electromagnetic modes within the structure
(dark modes), an external plane wave will not be able to couple to
these and will be fully reflected up to the frequencies where higher
order modes begin to transmit at around 14 GHz. The “dark”
mode is seen in Figure f to lie below the light line and to be nearly dispersionless from
around 10 GHz down to the DC.
Figure 1
Structure of the single mesh (a) and double
nested mesh (b). The
electric field magnitude (colors) and direction (arrows) for the transmitted
mode in the single mesh are shown in (c) and those for the low-frequency
mode in the double mesh are shown in (d) for the plane parallel to
the wavevector. (e, f) Dispersion relations of both meshes as simulated
in Comsol for a mesh with a 1 cm lattice constant and a rod thickness
of 0.5 mm with the second mesh situated exactly in the middle of the
first for the double mesh structure. The inset shows the first Brillouin
zone for a cubic lattice and the red line represents the light line.
Structure of the single mesh (a) and double
nested mesh (b). The
electric field magnitude (colors) and direction (arrows) for the transmitted
mode in the single mesh are shown in (c) and those for the low-frequency
mode in the double mesh are shown in (d) for the plane parallel to
the wavevector. (e, f) Dispersion relations of both meshes as simulated
in Comsol for a mesh with a 1 cm lattice constant and a rod thickness
of 0.5 mm with the second mesh situated exactly in the middle of the
first for the double mesh structure. The inset shows the first Brillouin
zone for a cubic lattice and the red line represents the light line.
Experimental Observation of Single Mesh Modes
It has historically been very difficult to examine 3D meshes experimentally
due to the problems with fabrication, and previous studies show samples,
usually made from sheets of PCB fitted together,[2,10] and
always only a few unit cells thick,[11] allowing
for limited exploration. However, with modern 3D printing technology,
it is now possible to fabricate very complex structures with far fewer
processing restrictions than conventional manufacturing techniques.
For complex three-dimensional structures in the microwave regime,
selective laser sintering techniques are especially applicable, as
the powder-bed nature of the printing process removes the need for
supports, allowing for significantly greater design freedom than other
methods. Figure a
shows a cubic mesh of 15 × 15 × 10, 1 cm unit cells with
a wire radius of 1 mm and a lattice spacing of 10 mm fabricated from
PA12 nylon in an EOS Formiga P100 SLS 3D printer. The sample was metallized
by dip-coating into a MG Chemicals “Super shield” conductive
paint, with a conductivity of 1.85 × 105 S/m. SLS
is a method that does not leave a perfectly smooth surface, and these
samples were left with an RMS surface roughness of 0.1 mm. The transmission
of such a structure, as modeled on COMSOL multiphysics and measured
experimentally, is plotted in Figure b. Experimental data was taken by placing the sample
between two horn antennas and measuring the transmitted signal on
an Anritsu 20 GHz VNA instrument. The sample is placed 3 m from the
emitting antenna to ensure that all radiation reaching the sample
is planar with approximately the same wavevector. We observe a series
of peaks within an envelope corresponding to the first pass band of
the structure as shown in Figure e. The peaks are the Fabry–Perot resonances
formed from reflections at the faces of this finite lattice. These
peaks fall below the unity value expected for a perfect conductor
due to the finite conductivity of the paint and the roughness of the
prints. Excellent agreement between the simulated and measured transmission
is observed, although there is some broadening of the measured peaks,
which can be attributed to small variations in the wire dimensions
from the printing process, leading to radiation scattering and peak
broadening.[17−19]
Figure 2
(a) Photograph of the metallized 3D printed single grid.
(b) Simulated
and experimental transmission for a single grid with a lattice parameter
of 1 cm, a wire radius of 0.9 mm, RMS surface roughness of 0.1 mm,
and conductivity of 1.85 × 105 S/m. (c) Simulated
and experimental dispersion relation of the grids, derived from the
Fabry–Perot peaks.
(a) Photograph of the metallized 3D printed single grid.
(b) Simulated
and experimental transmission for a single grid with a lattice parameter
of 1 cm, a wire radius of 0.9 mm, RMS surface roughness of 0.1 mm,
and conductivity of 1.85 × 105 S/m. (c) Simulated
and experimental dispersion relation of the grids, derived from the
Fabry–Perot peaks.The frequencies of the Fabry–Perot resonances can be utilized
to obtain the approximate index of the material as a function of frequency[20−22] through the well-known relation:Here n is
the refractive index of the mesh, L is the thickness,
and m is the mode order. Once the refractive index
is determined, the dispersion relation can be obtained from ω
= cnk. As shown in Figure c, this gives excellent agreement with the
simulated dispersion of the transmitted mode. While the behavior of
a wire grid metamaterial is well-established, for the simplest case
of a cubic grid, there has been limited experimental evidence showing
the dispersion relation across the Brillouin zone for this structure
due to difficulties in fabrication,[10,11] which we here
demonstrate can be surpassed using 3D printing techniques.
Antenna
Coupling to the Double Mesh
However, for the double mesh
structure in Figure b, observing the transmission for the unaltered
structure is not an option, since, as discussed, it is not possible
to couple to the longitudinal “dark” mode of the structure
with a plane wave. To overcome this, we added a monopole antenna at
right angles to the end of each of the rods terminating at a pair
of faces for one of the grids as shown in Figure . Through this design,
the electric field of an incident plane wave is able to interact with
the monopoles, which then couple to the longitudinal modes via a similar
mechanism to an antenna at the end of a coaxial cable. At the opposite
face of the structure, the reverse process occurs and the longitudinal
mode causes current oscillations in the monopoles which leads the
structure to radiate a plane wave.
Figure 3
Modeling the impact of attaching monopole
antennas to one grid.
(a, b) Design and printed sample of the antenna structure with the
monopole antennas attached to one of the nested grids. (c) Model transmission
for a 1 cm grid 10 unit cells deep constructed of perfectly conducting
rods terminated via different length antennas in order to explore
the effect of antenna dimension on transmission. In (d), the fwhm
widths of the Fabry–Perot peaks in the model transmission plot
are displayed as a function of frequency, and in (e) the reflectance
of the double mesh surface with antennas is shown in order to demonstrate
the strength of the antenna coupling to the double mesh for different
antenna lengths.
Modeling the impact of attaching monopole
antennas to one grid.
(a, b) Design and printed sample of the antenna structure with the
monopole antennas attached to one of the nested grids. (c) Model transmission
for a 1 cm grid 10 unit cells deep constructed of perfectly conducting
rods terminated via different length antennas in order to explore
the effect of antenna dimension on transmission. In (d), the fwhm
widths of the Fabry–Perot peaks in the model transmission plot
are displayed as a function of frequency, and in (e) the reflectance
of the double mesh surface with antennas is shown in order to demonstrate
the strength of the antenna coupling to the double mesh for different
antenna lengths.Since the short additional
antennas have a resonance defined by
their length, they will only allow effective coupling to the structure
around this resonance. In Figure c, it can be seen that while Fabry–Perot peaks
exist for all frequencies where the mode of the double mesh exists,
there are regions where the peaks are broad and regions where they
are almost delta functions. This behavior relates directly to the
antenna resonance, since with no antennas the surface of the double
mesh reflects perfectly (R = 1) due to the mode mismatch,
whereas with the addition of the antenna it can transmit radiation
near the antenna resonance, so the surface reflection is reduced.
The finesse, F, is a measure of a sharpness of the
interference fringes and is directly dependent on the reflection coefficient
and inversely proportional to the fwhm:Therefore, by measuring the
peak width and peak spacing, the reflection coefficient, R, at the edge of the material due to the antennas can be extracted
from the transmission data. This reflection coefficient is determined
by the impedance of the antenna and that of the grid, and will of
course vary with frequency due to the antenna resonance.[23]Therefore, the transmission plots in Figure c can be viewed as
the FP response of a dielectric
with the same effective index as the double mesh, but whose reflectance
is defined by the impedance match between the antennas and the grid.
By measuring the fwhm of the peaks, it is possible to extract the
position of the antenna resonance (Figure d) and the corresponding reflectance of the
structure via eq (Figure e). As can be seen
in Figure d and e,
for longer antennas, the spectral window where R ≠
1 shifts to lower frequencies. The lower limit of this is dictated
by the size of the antenna, which for a 1 cm mesh with antennas parallel
to one of the cubic axes cannot be larger than the unit cell without
them touching and causing a short-circuit (although shown in Figure , the angle of the
antennas with respect to the grid does not affect the field inside
the structure, and so antennas at a small angle to one of the in-plane
grid axes could in principle be made arbitrarily long, although in
practice this would be limited by thickness of the 3D print). As we
are principally interested in the nondispersive, low frequency mode
of this structure, we select an 8 mm antenna to explore the broadest
range of interest while still being readily fabricated. It should
be noted that Figure c shows modeling results for the case of a perfect electrical conductor
and any losses introduced into the system will rapidly degrade the
narrow peaks far from the antenna resonance, making them difficult
to observe in practice and the observable resonances are defined by
the antenna window as seen in Figure .
Figure 5
(a, b) Illustration showing a single unit cell of the double mesh
with the end antennas oriented perpendicular and parallel on either
end face. (c) Measured transmission corresponding to a WR 137 waveguide
through a 14 unit cell mesh with the antennas at each face at 90°
as the receiving horn antenna is rotated with respect to the emitting
horn. (d) The same for a 10 unit cell mesh with the antennas parallel.
Mesh dimensions are the same as described previously, and values are
normalized to the maximum. (e) Normalized transmission values for
both grids at their maximum value (dashed line in (c), (d)) as the
receiving horn antenna is rotated. (f) Electric field of radiation
transmitting though a double mesh with identical antennas at either
end of the mesh. (g) Electric field of radiation at 11.5 GHz transmitting
though a double mesh with antennas inverted at the rear face compared
to the front, demonstrating a π-phase inversion for radiation
passing through the structure compared to the previous case.
Figure 4
Experimental demonstration of transmission through a real
sample.
(a) Photograph of the metallized 3D printed double mesh. (b) Simulated
and experimental transmission for a double grid with a lattice parameter
of 1 cm, a wire radius of 0.9 mm and RMS surface roughness of 0.1
mm, with 8.2 mm monopole antennas and a conductivity of 1.85 ×
105 S/m. (c) Simulated and experimental dispersion relation
of the grids, derived from the Fabry–Perot peaks. The blue
shaded region denotes the fwhm of the peak for a 8 mm antenna in Figure d.
Experimental demonstration of transmission through a real
sample.
(a) Photograph of the metallized 3D printed double mesh. (b) Simulated
and experimental transmission for a double grid with a lattice parameter
of 1 cm, a wire radius of 0.9 mm and RMS surface roughness of 0.1
mm, with 8.2 mm monopole antennas and a conductivity of 1.85 ×
105 S/m. (c) Simulated and experimental dispersion relation
of the grids, derived from the Fabry–Perot peaks. The blue
shaded region denotes the fwhm of the peak for a 8 mm antenna in Figure d.After establishing the addition of monopole antennas to opposite
faces of one of the meshes as a reliable and readily fabricable method
for coupling an incident plane wave into the interlaced double mesh,
a sample was fabricated using the same method as for the single mesh
described earlier and is shown in Figure a. Once again the transmission is simulated
using Comsol and measured using a pair of horn antennas connected
to a VNA – as Figure b shows. Again the results show excellent agreement in terms
of frequency, although the peaks appear broader and weaker than for
the single mesh which can be attributed to the increased scattering
from the surfaces owing to the larger density of wires in the grid.[17−19]Using the same approach as for the single mesh structures,
the
dispersion relation for the longitudinal mode of the interlaced double
mesh was determined from the transmission plots and is shown in Figure c. Due to the limitations
imposed by the antenna lengths, a good signal was only achieved within
the window given by the fwhm of the antenna resonance as taken from Figure d, but this is more
than sufficient to verify the nondispersive, broadband nature of the
longitudinal “dark” mode generated by the nested double
mesh structure.
Polarization Rotation and Phase Control
A further interesting feature of this structure is that the character
of the mode within it is independent of the antennas used to excite
it. Therefore, any antenna in any orientation (as long as there is
an electric field component of the incident wave parallel to the antenna)
can be used to excite the modes of the double mesh and likewise any
antenna of any orientation can be used to couple light out. This makes
the structure an efficient converter of electromagnetic energy to
different polarization states, which has applications in imaging,
sensing, and beam shaping.[24−26]In Figure , we demonstrate the use of this structure
both to achieve polarization rotation and a π phase flip. Figure c shows the maximum
experimental normalized transmission of a double mesh with antennas
on opposite faces both parallel and perpendicular to each other as
the receiving horn antenna is rotated in relation to the emitting
antenna, which is always aligned parallel to the antennas on the front
face. It can be clearly observed that when both horn antennas are
aligned to the same polarization, the transmitted signal is strongest
for a double mesh with parallel antennas on opposite faces and near
zero for one with antennas on the rear face rotated 90° to the
antennas on the front face. When the receiving horn antenna is rotated
90° to the emitting antenna, the converse is true, demonstrating
that this structure is capable of producing complete polarization
rotation. As each antenna is independent of its neighbors, this principle
could be used to achieve beam shaping effects such as vector beam
generation.(a, b) Illustration showing a single unit cell of the double mesh
with the end antennas oriented perpendicular and parallel on either
end face. (c) Measured transmission corresponding to a WR 137 waveguide
through a 14 unit cell mesh with the antennas at each face at 90°
as the receiving horn antenna is rotated with respect to the emitting
horn. (d) The same for a 10 unit cell mesh with the antennas parallel.
Mesh dimensions are the same as described previously, and values are
normalized to the maximum. (e) Normalized transmission values for
both grids at their maximum value (dashed line in (c), (d)) as the
receiving horn antenna is rotated. (f) Electric field of radiation
transmitting though a double mesh with identical antennas at either
end of the mesh. (g) Electric field of radiation at 11.5 GHz transmitting
though a double mesh with antennas inverted at the rear face compared
to the front, demonstrating a π-phase inversion for radiation
passing through the structure compared to the previous case.This principle can be extended to demonstrate control
of the phase
exiting the double mesh, as shown in Figure f and g, where the antenna at the far end
of a simulated double mesh structure is aligned in either an “up”
or a “down” configuration. It can be clearly seen that
there is a phase shift of π in the outgoing radiation between
the two structures.
Conclusions
In this study, single
and double interlaced metallic meshes were
fabricated using an SLS 3D printer and then metallized using conductive
paint. Measurements of transmission through the structures showed
good agreement with simulations, as did the dispersion relations extrapolated
from experimental data. In addition, we experimentally probe the “dark”
longitudinal modes of an interlaced double mesh structure by terminating
one of the nested meshes with a monopole antenna, which allows free-space
plane waves of frequencies about the antenna resonance to couple to
the modes inside the structure. This is the first experimental demonstration
of a new class of 3D metamaterial. Furthermore, we show that the longitudinal
mode of the structure is independent of the orientation of the antennas
used to excite it. Therefore, the structure can be used to efficiently
rotate polarization or control the phase of the radiation leaving
it, which has applications in imaging, sensing, and beam shaping.