Literature DB >> 33842647

A novel compound heterozygous mutation in ABCB4 gene in a pedigree with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis 3: a case report.

Jie Bai1,2, Lu Li1, Hui Liu3, Shuang Liu2, Li Bai2, Hanbing Ning4, Wenyan Song5, Huaibin Zou1, Xinxin Wang3, Yu Chen1,2, Sujun Zheng6, Zhongping Duan1,2.   

Abstract

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) includes a group of genetic autosomal recessive disorders that predominantly affects young children and results in early-onset progressive liver damage. Variations in ABCB4 have been shown to cause PFIC3. However, the association between ABCB4 genotype and clinical manifestations remains unclear. We investigated the clinical manifestations and genetic features of a Chinese Han pedigree with PFIC3. A 15-year-old boy, with high-serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) cholestatic cirrhosis, was diagnosed with PIFC3. After ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment, the boy stayed in a relatively stable state with mild itching, and elevated γ-GT exhibited a remarkable decrease. Genetic testing identified a novel compound heterozygous mutation L842P/V1051A in ABCB4, which was inherited from his mother and father, respectively. Several predictive software suggested that these two mutations are pathogenic. Interestingly, the same compound heterozygous mutation was also found in his two sisters, one of whom had a history of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) and the other had asymptomatic gallstones. Therefore, this novel compound heterozygous mutation L842P/V1051A caused a continuum of ABCB4-related diseases including ICP, cholelithiasis and PFIC3 in our pedigree. The inconsistency between genotypes and phenotypes may be influenced by other factors. Genetic testing will be useful for diagnosis and genetic counseling. 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABCB4; Liver cirrhosis; Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC); case report; compound heterozygous mutation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33842647      PMCID: PMC8033375          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by early-onset intrahepatic cholestasis (1). It often occurs in infants or children and accounts for 9%-13% of infant cholestasis (2).PFIC can be divided into 6 types according to different pathogenic genes (3). The pathogenic genes for type 1-6 PFIC are ATP8B1, ABCB11, ABCB4, TJP2, NR1H4 and MYO5B, respectively (4-6). For PFIC3, the mutation in ABCB4 gene leads to the deficiency of class III multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (MDR3), thus affecting the transport of phosphatidylcholine (PC) from the hepatocytes to the bile ducts. The ensuing increase in free bile acids and cholesterol crystals is responsible for the damage of cholangiocyte membranes (7,8). Since PFIC3 does not cause bile acids to stay in liver cells, cholestasis appears late, and progresses slowly. PFIC3 patients usually present with a combination of mild jaundice, pruritus, hepatomegaly and growth retardation. Elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) level is regarded as a serological feature in patients with PFIC3. The characteristic histopathological changes in PFIC3 consist of non-specific portal inflammation, extensive portal fibrosis, and cholestasis with ductular proliferation. To date, more than 500 mutations in ABCB4 gene have been reported, most of which are missense mutations (9).ABCB4 gene variants are closely associated with several liver diseases such as PFIC3, benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP), drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis (LPAC) (10,11). Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in ABCB4 gene used to be considered as characteristic variants in PFIC3 patients, whereas heterozygous mutations in a single allele were reported in patients with LPAC and ICP (11). Nevertheless, the relationship between genotype and phenotype remains to be elucidated, and the molecular mechanisms underlying PFIC3 and other ABCB4-related liver diseases still need to be explored. Herein, we aimed to report a novel compound heterozygous mutation in ABCB4 gene and to investigate the clinical manifestations and genetic features in a Chinese Han pedigree with PFIC3. We present the following article in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3747).

Case presentation

The patient (II:3), a 15-year-old boy, was admitted to Beijing You An Hospital in 2019 with the complaint of yellow urine for one year. The boy was in good performance status with a normal BMI at admission. Moderate skin and scleral jaundice were observed. His left breast was slightly enlarged. Physical examination found that the spleen was enlarged with its lower edge 3 cm above the navel. No signs of lung and heart abnormalities were observed. Total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bile acid (TBA) and γ-GT were elevated (). PLT count (77×109/L) was decreased. Fasting plasma lipids and immunoglobulins including IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgE were normal. Blood coagulation function, autoantibodies profile, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), and alpha fetal protein (AFP) were also normal.
Table 1

Biochemical characteristics of the patient

Examination itemReference2019.082019.092019.102019.112020.012020.03
Total serum bilirubin (μmol/L)5–21107.7100.2174.3124142.5122.5
Direct bilirubin (μmol/L)<777.583.5137.886.7107.5108.2
Alanine aminotransferase (U/L)9–50139.597108348996.5
Aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)15–40183.76165149139162
γ-glutamyltransferase (U/L)10–60394.3284.5337.4413351188.4
Alkaline phosphatase (U/L)45–125348330372353372392
Total serum bile acid (μmol/L)<10115.5167.7166.6184.5147113.4
Albumin (g/L)36–5532.931.832.236.230.434.9
White blood cell (×109/L)3.5–9.53.414.283.823.693.964.2
Hemoglobin (g/L)130–17512198108110129138
Platelets (×109/L)125–350777777836362
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) reported liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, collateral pathway, and stenosis of portal vein (). Gastroscopy revealed severe esophagogastric varices (). Histopathology examination showed biliary cirrhosis with ductopenia, ductular reaction, and cholestasis (). The handling and staining of liver specimens are performed according to the description by Suriawinata et al. (12).
Figure 1

The imaging examination revealed liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, collateral access and portal vein stenosis. (A) Contrast-enhanced CT shows liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly (blue arrow), and collateral pathway (red arrow); (B) the reconstructed MIP image shows splenomegaly (blue arrow) and the portal vein is about 8 mm in diameter.

Figure 2

The gastroscopy reveals severe esophagogastric varices. (A) Esophagus; (B) cardia; (C) fundus of stomach; (D) body of stomach; (E) antrum of stomach; (F) descending part of duodenum. The esophagogastric varices are indicated by red arrow.

Figure 3

The liver histopathology reveals biliary cirrhosis. (A) Cirrhosis demonstrated by Masson trichome staining (Masson trichome 100×); (B) Ductopenia and ductular reaction (Immunostaining for CK-7, 100×); (C) Cholate stasis and formation of Mallory-Denk bodies (red arrow) (H&E 400×); (D) Copper accumulation (Rhodanine 200×) in periseptal liver cells.

The imaging examination revealed liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly, collateral access and portal vein stenosis. (A) Contrast-enhanced CT shows liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly (blue arrow), and collateral pathway (red arrow); (B) the reconstructed MIP image shows splenomegaly (blue arrow) and the portal vein is about 8 mm in diameter. The gastroscopy reveals severe esophagogastric varices. (A) Esophagus; (B) cardia; (C) fundus of stomach; (D) body of stomach; (E) antrum of stomach; (F) descending part of duodenum. The esophagogastric varices are indicated by red arrow. The liver histopathology reveals biliary cirrhosis. (A) Cirrhosis demonstrated by Masson trichome staining (Masson trichome 100×); (B) Ductopenia and ductular reaction (Immunostaining for CK-7, 100×); (C) Cholate stasis and formation of Mallory-Denk bodies (red arrow) (H&E 400×); (D) Copper accumulation (Rhodanine 200×) in periseptal liver cells. The patient was diagnosed with PFIC3 in terms of jaundice, cholestasis, persistent pruritus, and elevated γ-GT. He has been undergoing therapy with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and cholestyramine. After therapy, the boy stayed in a relatively stable state with mild itching, and elevated γ-GT exhibited a remarkable decrease (). We also investigated the family members of the patient. His two sisters were in their 20s. An elder sister (II:3) was diagnosed as ICP at the age of 17 (). Pruritus and increased levels of ALT (104 U/L), AST (82 U/L), TB (25.8 μmol/L), and TBA (49.7 μmol/L) were reported. The relieved symptom and improved liver function were noticed after the treatment with UDCA for 20 days. All abnormalities had completely resolved after discharge. Another sister (II:2) had asymptomatic gallstones. His mother suffered from gallstones and underwent cholecystectomy. The history of ICP had been denied. Other family members had no PFIC-related symptoms and no abnormalities in physical examination.
Figure 4

Pedigree chart of the patient’s family. The arrow indicates the patient. PFIC3, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Pedigree chart of the patient’s family. The arrow indicates the patient. PFIC3, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; ICP, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Genetic testing results and bioinformatics analyses

To explore the genetic factor for PFIC3, panel sequencing of major genes involved in liver metabolism was performed in the patient (II:1). A total of 289 genes were detected, including the common PFIC-related genes ATP8B1, ABCB11 and ABCB4. As a result, a novel compound heterozygous mutation c.T2525C (p.L842P)/c.T3152C (p.V1051A) in ABCB4 (isoform A) was identified. These two mutations were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing (). Seven pieces of software were utilized to predict the pathogenicity of these two gene mutations. As shown in , all software except for InterVar showed that the mutations L842P and V1051A were pathogenic or damaging. The PhastCons scores of these two mutations were both 1, and the corresponding PhyloP values were 4.82 and 3.425, respectively, suggesting the high conservation of these two amino acids.
Figure 5

Sanger sequencing reveals two heterozygous mutations in ABCB4 gene, c.T2525C(p.L842P) and c.T3152C(p.V1051A).

Table 2

Bioinformatics analysis of the ABCB4 mutations

MutationPolyPhen2SIFTPROVEANMutationTasterFATHMMInterVarMutPred2
ScorePredictionScorePredictionScorePredictionScorePredictionScorePredictionPredictionScore
c.T2525C (p.L842P)0.998Probably damaging0.001Deleterious–5.86Deleterious1Disease causing–2.62DamagingUncertain significance0.879
c.T3152C (p.V1051A)0.818Possibly damaging0Deleterious–3.81Deleterious1Disease causing–2.78DamagingUncertain significance0.530
Sanger sequencing reveals two heterozygous mutations in ABCB4 gene, c.T2525C(p.L842P) and c.T3152C(p.V1051A). The known molecular structure of ABCB4 was obtained from Protein Data Bank (Primary Citation of Related Structures: 6S7P) (13), as shown in . The mutated ABCB4 structures were constructed by SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive). And molecular graphics were analyzed by Swiss-Pdb Viewer 4.1.0 software (). In the predicted mutation structures, the secondary structure of this protein was not affected by the substitution of these two amino acids.
Figure 6

3D structure of ABCB4. (A) Wild-type; (B) mutant type, (1) for c.T2525C(p.L842P) and (2) for c.T3152C(p.V1051A). The structure of ABCB4 was obtained from Protein Data Bank (Primary Citation of Related Structures: 6S7P). And the mutant structures of ABCB4 were constructed by SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive). Molecular graphics were analyzed by Swiss-Pdb Viewer 4.1.0 software.

3D structure of ABCB4. (A) Wild-type; (B) mutant type, (1) for c.T2525C(p.L842P) and (2) for c.T3152C(p.V1051A). The structure of ABCB4 was obtained from Protein Data Bank (Primary Citation of Related Structures: 6S7P). And the mutant structures of ABCB4 were constructed by SWISS-MODEL (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive). Molecular graphics were analyzed by Swiss-Pdb Viewer 4.1.0 software. Moreover, we tested the mutations in ABCB4 gene for other family members. The same compound heterozygous mutation was also found in his two sisters (). In addition, his mother (I:2) carried the variant L842P, whereas his father (I:1) was a carrier of the other variant V1051A (). No other ABCB4 gene variants were observed in this pedigree.

Ethical statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institute Ethical Committee of Beijing You An Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Discussion

PFIC3 is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by early-onset cholestasis and progressive liver damage caused by severe mutations in the ABCB4 gene (7,8). In the present study, we describe a Chinese Han pedigree suffering from PFIC3. To our knowledge, this is the first time to report a novel compound heterozygous mutation L842P/V1051A in ABCB4 gene in a 15-year-old PFIC3 patient. In addition, family members who share the same ABCB4 genotype with the patient exhibit completely different phenotypes, namely, ICP or asymptomatic gallstones. Human ABCB4 gene is located on chromosome 7q21.1 and encodes the hepatobiliary PC floppase MDR3. In patients with MDR3 deficiency, the accumulation of nonmicellar, free bile acids may lead to injured cholangiocytes. MDR3 deficiency in PFIC3 can be ascribed to the mutation of two alleles (biallelic variants) in the ABCB4 gene, of which missense variants are the most popular. Furthermore, frameshift variants and splicing mutations in ABCB4 have also been reported (14,15). Disease severity depends on the type of mutations and the remaining function of the transporter protein (16). Dröge et al. have shown that four common ABCB4 SNPs c.175C>T (p.L59L), c.504C>T (p.N168N), c.711A>T (p.I237I) and c.1954A>G (p.R652G) may contribute to cholestasis (17). For those patients without disease-causing mutation, 19% of them display the combinations of the common synonymous variant c.711A>T with two other common polymorphisms c.175C>T and c.504C>T (17). In our pedigree, the patient exhibited typical manifestations of PFIC3 (jaundice, cholestasis, and pruritus) accompanied by elevated serum γ-GT levels. Panel sequencing of 289 genes involved in liver metabolism identified a novel compound heterozygous mutation L842P/V1051A in ABCB4 gene in the patient, which was inherited from his mother and father, respectively. ABCB4 variants detected by NGS were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Most predictive software except for InterVar suggested that these two mutations are pathogenic. InterVar is a semi-automatic bioinformatics tool. It is helpful for clinical interpretation of genetic variants by algorithms different from other software. This may account for, at least in part, the difference in predictive results. In addition, PhastCons and PhyloP indicated the high conservation of these two amino acids, suggesting that these two mutations have a great impact on the function of proteins. These results show that these two mutations are responsible for PFIC3 in this patient. ABCB4 consists of two ATP-binding cassettes, called the nucleotide binding domain (NBD), and six transmembrane-spanning segments, known as transmembrane domain (TMD). The TMDs form the translocation pathway across biofilms. Two TMDs form the required functional unit together with energy, which is provided by ATP binding and/or hydrolysis within the NBDs, thus allowing substrate transport against a concentration gradient (10). The mutation L842P is located in TMD, while V1051A is located in NBD. At present, the pathogenesis of these two mutations remains unclear. We speculated that L842P, similarly to the reported mutations P726L, S346I and A286V in TMD, may interact with residues in the core of ABCB4, resulting in impaired function (12). Likewise, variation V1051A may cause ATP binding disorder, which is essential for ABCB4-mediated PC extrusion, in a manner similar to mutation S1076C located in NBD (13). We also analyzed the predictive mutation structure and found that the substitution of two amino acids has no impact on the secondary structure of the protein, which may result in a partial residual of protein function. This may be the reason why the patient had a late-onset manifestation. It is increasingly recognized that genetic variations in ABCB4 cause several cholestatic liver diseases including PFIC3, ICP, LPAC, and DILI (11,18,19). Moreover, genomic studies have shown a link between ABCB4 dysfunction and hepatobiliary malignancies (20,21). PFIC3 represents a severe form of ABCB4 deficiency. ICP is the most common primary liver disease during pregnancy and characterized by maternal pruritus and increased serum bile acid concentrations (22). LPAC is a peculiar form of intrahepatic cholelithiasis occurring in young adults, which may also recur after cholecystectomy. LPAC and ICP are generally thought to be caused by monoallelic mutations, while PFIC3 is caused by homozygotes or compound heterozygous variant of ABCB4 (11). Furthermore, synonymous, missense, or truncating variants account for ICP and LPAC; nonsense mutations lead to PFIC3 (23-25). Currently, the molecular mechanisms underlying such a wide range of phenotype heterogeneity are not fully understood. Poupon et al. have reported that an LPAC patient with an ABCB4 homozygous missense mutation (p.Arg47Gln) eventually developed cholangiocarcinoma (26). A large cohort study on LPAC showed that LPAC syndrome is more frequent in women and highly associated with ICP (23). In the current study, two sisters had the same ABCB4 genotype as the patient, but one of them suffered from ICP and the other had asymptomatic gallstones. The above evidence suggests that the same genotype may result in different phenotypes or overlapping disease manifestations. A possible explanation is that a multifactorial etiology including hormonal, environmental, and genetic factors contributes to the development of ABCB4 deficiency-associated diseases. In addition, the patient’s parents carried a monoallelic mutation in ABCB4. His mother had gallstones and underwent cholecystectomy, whereas his father was healthy. This suggests that the mutation L842P carried by his mother has a greater impact on ABCB4 function. Even though genotype-phenotype correlations are often weak, the detection of genetic variants might be helpful for the diagnosis and counseling of individual patients with ABCB4 deficiency-associated diseases and their families. Moreover, some patients without detectable variants presented similarly to patients with variants, indicating that yet unexplored regions of the ABCB4 and other genes may be involved (23). Therefore, genetic testing can be useful to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of this group of diseases and discover new potentially pathogenic genes. Further, considering the cost and the willingness of the patient’s family, we did not detect other genes involved in biliary diseases other than ABCB4, which may partially explain the difference between siblings. The patient and his family need continued follow-up. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that a novel compound heterozygous mutation L842P/V1051A in ABCB4 may cause PFIC3 in the pedigree. Our results also reveal inconsistence between genotypes and phenotypes, showing significant diversity. The effect of novel variations on protein function needs further exploration. The article’s supplementary files as
  25 in total

1.  Low-Phospholipid Associated Cholelithiasis (LPAC) syndrome: A synthetic review.

Authors:  P Goubault; T Brunel; A Rode; B Bancel; K Mohkam; J-Y Mabrut
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 2.043

2.  ABCB4/MDR3 gene mutations and cholangiocarcinomas.

Authors:  David Tougeron; Ginette Fotsing; Veronique Barbu; Michel Beauchant
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 25.083

Review 3.  Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis.

Authors:  Laura N Bull; Richard J Thompson
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.126

4.  ABCB4 and ABCB11 mutations in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in an Italian population.

Authors:  Claudia Anzivino; Maria Rosaria Odoardi; Erica Meschiari; Enrica Baldelli; Fabio Facchinetti; Isabella Neri; Giuseppe Ruggiero; Rosa Zampino; Marco Bertolotti; Paola Loria; Lucia Carulli
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Mutations in TJP2 cause progressive cholestatic liver disease.

Authors:  Melissa Sambrotta; Sandra Strautnieks; Efterpi Papouli; Peter Rushton; Barnaby E Clark; David A Parry; Clare V Logan; Lucy J Newbury; Binita M Kamath; Simon Ling; Tassos Grammatikopoulos; Bart E Wagner; John C Magee; Ronald J Sokol; Giorgina Mieli-Vergani; Joshua D Smith; Colin A Johnson; Patricia McClean; Michael A Simpson; A S Knisely; Laura N Bull; Richard J Thompson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Genotype-phenotype relationships in the low-phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome: a study of 156 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Raoul Poupon; Olivier Rosmorduc; Pierre Yves Boëlle; Yves Chrétien; Christophe Corpechot; Olivier Chazouillères; Chantal Housset; Véronique Barbu
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  ABCB4 mutations in adult patients with cholestatic liver disease: impact and phenotypic expression.

Authors:  Dario Degiorgio; Andrea Crosignani; Carla Colombo; Domenico Bordo; Massimo Zuin; Emanuela Vassallo; Marie-Louise Syrén; Domenico A Coviello; Pier Maria Battezzati
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Structure of the human lipid exporter ABCB4 in a lipid environment.

Authors:  Jeppe A Olsen; Amer Alam; Julia Kowal; Bruno Stieger; Kaspar P Locher
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  Mutations in the nuclear bile acid receptor FXR cause progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis.

Authors:  Natalia Gomez-Ospina; Carol J Potter; Rui Xiao; Kandamurugu Manickam; Mi-Sun Kim; Kang Ho Kim; Benjamin L Shneider; Jennifer L Picarsic; Theodora A Jacobson; Jing Zhang; Weimin He; Pengfei Liu; A S Knisely; Milton J Finegold; Donna M Muzny; Eric Boerwinkle; James R Lupski; Sharon E Plon; Richard A Gibbs; Christine M Eng; Yaping Yang; Gabriel C Washington; Matthew H Porteus; William E Berquist; Neeraja Kambham; Ravinder J Singh; Fan Xia; Gregory M Enns; David D Moore
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  ABCB4 missense mutations D243A, K435T, G535D, I490T, R545C, and S978P significantly impair the lipid floppase and likely predispose to secondary pathologies in the human population.

Authors:  Edward J Andress; Michael Nicolaou; Farrell McGeoghan; Kenneth J Linton
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.