Literature DB >> 3384263

Small bowel enteroclysis survey.

T J Barloon1, C C Lu, E A Franken, H Honda, K Berbaum.   

Abstract

A survey questionnaire was sent to 125 radiology programs to determine the frequency and indications for the use of small bowel enteroclysis. Sixty-seven of the 84 respondents perform small bowel enteroclysis while 17 do not. The 3 most common indications for enteroclysis are detection of unexplained gastrointestinal bleeding, partial small bowel obstruction, and Crohn's disease. We conclude that although small bowel enteroclysis is a well-established examination, there are wide differences in the frequency with which it is performed, the techniques of examination, and indications for its use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3384263     DOI: 10.1007/bf01889060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  18 in total

1.  The value of the duodenal intubation method (sellink modification) for the radiological visualization of the small bowel.

Authors:  P Fleckenstein; G Pedersen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Small-bowel radiography. A prospective comparative study of three techniques in 200 patients.

Authors:  P P Taverne; E J van der Jagt
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1985-09

3.  Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part II: Radiographic accuracy.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; F Van Swearingen; H A Munitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiology of the small bowel: enteroclysis and the conventional follow-through.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; R M Antley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Re: Detailed per-oral small-bowel examination versus enteroclysis.

Authors:  D J Nolan; P J Cadman; M A Jeffree
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Lesions missed on small-bowel follow-through: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  D D Maglinte; B T Burney; R E Miller
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Why not enteroclysis?

Authors:  H Herlinger
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 3.062

8.  Enterocylsis: the small bowel enema. How to succeed and how to fail.

Authors:  R E Miller; J L Sellink
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1979-08-15

9.  Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part I: Expenditures and radiation exposure.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand; F Van Swearingen; H A Munitz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Radiologic examination of the small intestine: review of 402 cases and discussion of indications and methods.

Authors:  W C Diner; E O Hoskins; F Navab
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.954

View more
  2 in total

1.  The value of double-contrast study of the small intestine in immunoproliferative small intestinal disease.

Authors:  T Matsumoto; M Iida; T Matsui; H Tanaka; M Fujishima
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

2.  Diagnostic difficulties with duodenal malignancies revisited: a new strategy.

Authors:  W Cwikiel; A Andrén-Sandberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.