Literature DB >> 33842597

Decreased serum fibroblast growth factor 19 level is a risk factor for type 1 diabetes.

Jingyi Hu1,2,3, Yingxin Tang1,2,3, Hui Liu1,2,3, Yanhua Li1,2,3, Xia Li1,2,3, Gan Huang1,2,3, Yang Xiao1,2,3, Zhiguang Zhou1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) is a regulator of glucose metabolism and may provide a new therapeutic target for type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, the clinical relevance of FGF19 in T1D remains unclear. In this study, we examined the relationship between the serum FGF19 concentration and T1D.
METHODS: This study included 81 newly diagnosed T1D patients and 80 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. The correlation between the FGF19 concentration and clinical characteristics of T1D patients and healthy controls was investigated. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether levels of FGF19 were independently associated with T1D.
RESULTS: The fasting serum FGF19 levels in the T1D group were significantly lower than those in the control group [159.9 (100.0-272.7) vs. 205.0 (126.9-307.9) pg/mL, P=0.008]. In all subjects, serum FGF19 levels were negatively correlated with fasting blood glucose (FBG) (r=-0.192, P=0.015). In the control group, serum FGF19 levels were positively correlated with total cholesterol (TC) (r=0.338, P=0.002) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) (r=0.300, P=0.007). In addition to sex and body mass index (BMI), FGF19 was an independent impact factor for T1D [odds ratio (OR) =0.541, P=0.023; adjusted for sex, age, BMI, presence of hypertension, and presence of dyslipidemia].
CONCLUSIONS: Low serum FGF19 level is associated with T1D, which could serve as a risk factor for T1D. 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Type 1 diabetes (T1D); fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19); risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 33842597      PMCID: PMC8033349          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D), a chronic disorder caused by autoimmune destruction of islet β cells (1,2), usually begins early in life; moreover, T1D is associated with serious short-term and long-term consequences that place a heavy burden on patients (3). The global incidence of T1D has been increasing yearly (4). However, the pathogenesis of T1D remains unclear and the current therapy for T1D is limited. Fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19), belongs to the endocrine FGF19 subfamily and differs from canonical FGF molecules, which function as circulating hormones. Previous studies have shown that FGF19 plays an indispensable role in bile acid (BA), glucose, and lipid metabolism (5) and could be a potential molecule for treating T1D. In this regard, scientists have found that FGF19 can activate the Ras and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) signaling pathways to stimulate hepatic glycogen production in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice (5,6), and that intraventricular injection of FGF19 in a rat model of T1D can reduce hepatic glucose production (HGP), improve blood glucose and reduce insulin resistance (7,8). In humans, recent publications have reported that FGF19 may be a major protector of islet β cell function (9). However, the relationship between FGF19 and T1D has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we measured circulating levels of FGF19 in T1D patients and age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects, aiming to investigate whether serum FGF19 levels change in T1D patients compared to those in healthy controls and to provide a possible explanation for the role of FGF19 during T1D development. We present the following article in accordance with the Materials Design Analysis Reporting (MDAR) checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5203).

Methods

Participants

We conducted a cross-sectional study of the Chinese Han population. Eighty-one newly diagnosed T1D patients were recruited from the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between September 1999 and November 2010 (). The inclusion criteria for patients in the T1D group were as follows: (I) clinical characteristics meeting the 1999 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (10); (II) insulin dependence within 6 months after diagnosis; (III) the presence of at least one positive autoantibody (GADA, IA-2A, ZnT8A); (IV) the presence of diabetic ketosis or ketoacidosis at the onset of the disease; and (V) duration of diabetes <1 year (11). The exclusion criteria were as follows: severe chronic cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, renal or liver disease; abnormalities in liver function, renal function or routine blood tests; hyperthyroidism; other autoimmune diseases; or malignant tumors. Age- and sex-matched controls were recruited from children in the community who came for health screening at the Children’s Health Center of the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University (12). Healthy controls were also collected at the same time (). Subjects with diabetes or a family history of diabetes, thyroid disease, other autoimmune diseases, or any other acute or chronic diseases were excluded from the group of healthy controls. The diagnosis of dyslipidemia was based on the 2001 American National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NECP-ATP III) standard (13). Hypertension was diagnosed when systolic blood pressure (SBP) was ≥140 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was ≥90 mmHg or if patients were taking antihypertensive medications (14).
Figure 1

Flow charts of T1D patients and control subjects recruited to the study. T1D, type 1 diabetes.

Flow charts of T1D patients and control subjects recruited to the study. T1D, type 1 diabetes.

Research design, anthropometric and biochemical measurements

Age, sex, and medical history of all subjects were recorded, and height, weight, waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), and blood pressure were measured according to standard measurement methods (15). After 8 hours of fasting, venous blood was collected in the morning from all participants. Serum samples separated from the collected venous blood were used to measure biochemical parameters, and the remaining serum was stored at −80 degrees Celsius. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) were measured by a Hitachi 7170 analyzer (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) (16). Fasting C-peptide (FCP) was measured by an automated chemical analyzer (Bayer Centaur Immunoassay System, Germany). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit was used to measure serum FGF19 levels according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioVendor, Cat. No.: RD191107200R). The minimum detection limit was 4.8 pg/mL, and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 6.0% and 7.5%, respectively.

Sample size

In this study, unpaired Student’s t-tests were used to calculate the sample size. Previous studies estimated that the standard deviation (SD) of fasting serum FGF19 levels of healthy controls was approximately 80, and it was estimated that a difference of 40 in the FGF19 level between the two groups was significant (17,18). For a power of 0.8 and α of 0.05, the number of participants required per group was 64 after formula calculation (19).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses of all data were performed with SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Normally distributed data, as determined by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, were presented as mean ± SD, and non-normally distributed data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Unpaired Student’s t-tests and nonparametric tests were used to compare differences in normally distributed and non-normally distributed data between two groups, respectively. The chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables between groups. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to analyze the association between serum FGF19 levels and other variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate independent impact factors of T1D. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Ethical statement

All participants were recruited, and all samples were collected after appropriate informed consent was provided by all participants or their guardians. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (No.: 2019-Research-40) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).

Results

The clinical characteristics of the 161 subjects are shown in . The age and sex of the T1D group were comparable to those of the controls (P>0.05). Compared with control subjects, patients with T1D had higher FBG, TC, TG, LDL-c, and creatinine (Cr) levels but lower body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), SBP, and FCP levels. In addition, serum FGF19 levels of T1D patients were significantly lower than those of healthy controls [159.9 (100.0–272.7) vs. 205.0 (126.9–307.9) pg/mL, P=0.008; ].
Table 1

Clinical characteristics among control subjects and T1D subjects

VariablesControl subjectsT1D patientsP
N8081
Age (years)11.0 (5.3–15.0)12.0 (9.0–16.5)NS
Male/female (n)32/4825/56NS
BMI (kg/m2)18.3 (15.5–20.2)16.9 (14.9–18.5)0.048
WHR0.9 (0.8–0.9)0.8 (0.8–0.9)<0.001
SBP (mmHg)110.0 (100.1–120.0)100.0 (90.0–110.0)<0.001
DBP (mmHg)67.3 (60.0–73.0)65.0 (60.0–70.0)NS
FBG (mmol/L)4.6 (4.2–5.0)10.5 (6.7–16.6)<0.001
FCP (pmol/L)315.2 (253.1–451.7)85.3 (35.6–170.3)<0.001
TG (mmol/L)0.7 (0.5–1.0)0.9 (0.7–1.3)<0.001
TC (mmol/L)3.6 (3.3–4.2)4.5 (3.7–5.3)<0.001
HDL-c (mmol/L)1.2 (1.0–1.4)1.3 (1.1–1.5)NS
LDL-c (mmol/L)2.1 (1.7–2.4)2.3 (2.0–2.7)0.001
BUN (mmol/L)4.4 (3.8–5.0)4.6 (3.8–5.2)NS
Cr (ìmol/L)42.2 (34.1–51.1)49.1 (40.6–59.2)0.003

Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FCP, fasting C-peptide; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine.

Figure 2

Comparison of serum FGF19 levels in the control group and T1D group. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19; T1D, type 1 diabetes. **, P<0.01.

Data are presented as mean ± SD or median (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FCP, fasting C-peptide; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine. Comparison of serum FGF19 levels in the control group and T1D group. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19; T1D, type 1 diabetes. **, P<0.01. In all subjects, serum FGF19 levels were negatively correlated with FBG and LDL-c (r=−0.192, P=0.015; r=0.165, P=0.037). There was no significant correlation between serum FGF19 levels and age, BMI, WHR, FBG, FCP, TG, HDL-c, SBP, diastolic DBP, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) or Cr, in either the control group or the T1D group (P>0.05). In addition, no correlation was found between FGF19 levels and the duration of T1D (P>0.05). Although no significant differences were observed between FGF19 levels and lipid profiles in the T1D group, FGF19 levels were positively correlated with TC and LDL-c (r=0.338, P=0.002; r=0.300, P=0.007; ) in the control group. After adjustment for sex and age, FGF19 levels remained positively correlated with TC (r=0.266, P=0.018; ).
Figure 3

Serum FGF19 levels were positively correlated with TC and LDL-c. (A) Correlation between FGF19 and TC in healthy controls, TC =1.25+0.46*lnFGF19. (B) Correlation between FGF19 and LDL-c in healthy controls, LDL-c =0.65+0.26*lnFGF19. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Table 2

Spearman correlations of serum FGF19 levels and metabolic parameters

VariablesAll subjectsControl subjectsT1D patients
rPrPrP
Age (years)−0.1250.113−0.1430.246−0.0730.519
BMI (kg/m2)0.0100.8960.0950.401−0.1210.280
WHR0.0130.871−0.0550.630−0.0710.528
FBG (mmol/L)−0.192*0.015−0.1010.371−0.0870.440
FCP (pmol/L)−0.0280.720−0.0730.522−0.2130.057
TG (mmol/L)−0.0200.8020.0410.7180.0050.962
TC (mmol/L)0.1280.1050.338**0.0020.1030.359
HDL-c (mmol/L)0.0420.5970.0740.5160.0490.663
LDL-c (mmol/L)0.165*0.0370.300**0.0070.1460.195
SBP (mm Hg)−0.0900.257−0.0490.6630.1210.282
DBP (mm Hg)−0.0080.915−0.0630.5780.0710.528
BUN (mmol/L)0.0180.8200.0700.539−0.0260.821
Cr (ìmol/L)−0.0970.222−0.0730.522−0.0400.721

BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FCP, fasting C-peptide; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine.

Serum FGF19 levels were positively correlated with TC and LDL-c. (A) Correlation between FGF19 and TC in healthy controls, TC =1.25+0.46*lnFGF19. (B) Correlation between FGF19 and LDL-c in healthy controls, LDL-c =0.65+0.26*lnFGF19. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-hip ratio; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FBG, fasting blood glucose; FCP, fasting C-peptide; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; HDL-c, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine. To assess the relationship between the serum concentrations of FGF19 and the development of T1D, unadjusted and multivariate adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the FGF19 level was a significant factor associated with the presence of T1D [odds ratio (OR) =0.511, P=0.009; ). As shown in , using T1D as the dependent variable, FGF19 (OR =0.541, P=0.023; ), together with age (OR =1.094, P=0.017), and BMI (OR =0.871, P=0.019), were independently associated with the presence of T1D.
Table 3

Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for T1D

VariablesSimpleMultiple
OR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
FGF190.511 (0.309–0.847)0.0090.541 (0.319–0.918)0.023
Sex1.493 (0.780–2.860)0.2271.094 (1.016–1.179)0.017
Age1.663 (0.978–2.829)0.0611.730 (0.833–3.591)0.141
BMI0.237 (0.048–1.167)0.0770.871 (0.776–0.978)0.019
Presence of hypertension2.026 (0.360–11.386)0.4233.593 (0.490–26.338)0.208
Presence of dyslipidemia1.077 (0.580–1.998)0.8140.807 (0.399–1.630)0.549

†, log transformed before analysis. Variables included in the adjusted model were sex, age, BMI, presence of hypertension, presence of dyslipidemia and FGF19. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19. BMI, body mass index.

†, log transformed before analysis. Variables included in the adjusted model were sex, age, BMI, presence of hypertension, presence of dyslipidemia and FGF19. FGF19, fibroblast growth factor 19. BMI, body mass index.

Discussion

In our study, we found that T1D patients had lower serum FGF19 levels than healthy controls, and low serum FGF19 levels were associated with the occurrence of T1D. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to focus on the association between FGF19 levels and T1D. T1D is characterized by destruction of islet β cells, which leads to insulin deficiency and glucose metabolic disorders (20,21). The discovery of metabolic mechanisms related to T1D can help to better understand its pathogenesis and improve the treatment of T1D. FGF19 plays an indispensable role in regulating glucose metabolism (22,23). The pancreas is the target organ of FGF19 (9,24). However, the association between FGF19 and T1D remains unclear. In this study, we found that patients with T1D had lower serum FGF19 levels than healthy controls. In STZ-induced diabetic mice, FGF19 can stimulate glycogen synthase activity through mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways to increase hepatic glycogen synthesis (5). In addition, FGF19 can inhibit the activity of cAMP regulatory element-binding protein (CREB) to downregulate glucose synthesis in mice (23,25). Perry et al. found that FGF19 can reduce HGP by inhibiting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in a rat model, indicating that FGF19 has a noninsulin hypoglycemic effect in T1D (7). Other studies have shown that the improvement of glucose metabolism by FGF19 involves the inhibition of AGRP/NPY neuronal activity (26). In humans, Hwang et al. found that patients with T1D had lower levels of hepatic glycogen than healthy controls (27). In this regard, we may conclude that a reduction in FGF19 levels in T1D patients could have resulted in low hepatic glycogen synthesis, which is related to imbalanced glycemic control. Our research suggests that serum FGF19 levels are associated with the presence of T1D, and this association may be related to the protective effect of FGF19 on islet β cells. Dysfunction of islet β cells is closely related to oxidative stress, and FGF19 can alleviate stressed β cells and preserve their function (9,28). FGF19 has been shown to induce antioxidant responses in STZ-induced diabetic mice via the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/nuclear erythroid factor 2-related factor 2 (NRF2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) signaling pathway (29). Another possibility is that FGF19 may regulate islet β cell secretion and insulin levels through the BA-farnesoid X receptor (FXR)-FGF19 axis and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion (9). In addition, the intestinal microbiota matures early in life and affects the immune response to mediate the development of T1D (30,31). The intestinal microbiota also regulates BA homeostasis by stimulating the expression of FGF19 through intestinal nuclear FXR (32-34). BAs have strong antibacterial activity that can directly regulate the intestinal microbiota (32). Furthermore, FGF19 serves as a link between the intestine and glucose metabolism. More research is needed to clarify the specific mechanism of the role of FGF19 in the metabolic balance of “intestinal microbiota-BA”. The aforementioned evidence may lead to the speculation that FGF19 could be a new therapeutic target for T1D. Moreover, increasing evidence in humans has revealed a significant correlation between FGF19 and glucose metabolism disorders. Three previous studies found that serum FGF19 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes and patients with impaired FBG were lower than those in controls with normal glucose tolerance (9,35,36). Consistent with previous studies, the serum FGF19 levels of all participants were negatively correlated with FBG in our study (35,37). However, no correlation was found between patients with T1D and healthy controls. We speculate that this may be due to the small sample size. Previous studies also found that FGF19 was positively correlated with HDL-c and negatively correlated with TG in patients with metabolic syndrome (38) and that FGF19 was negatively correlated with LDL-c in healthy controls (39). An FGF19 analog (NGM282) was used in clinical trials on healthy individuals, which resulted in increased serum cholesterol, HDL-c, and LDL-c levels and reduced TG levels (40). In our study, T1D patients had higher TC, TG, and LDL-c levels than healthy controls, and in the control group, FGF19 was positively correlated with TC and LDL-c. After adjusting for age and sex, FGF19 was positively correlated only with TC. One possible explanation is that FGF19 can affect cholesterol metabolism by inhibiting the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of bile, cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (CYP7A1) (23,41). One-third of the catabolism of cholesterol in the human body is achieved by conversion to BAs (42,43). Phosphorylation of liver FXR by the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src, induced by FGF19, maintained cholesterol homeostasis (44). In addition, FGF19 can increase fatty acid β oxidation by inhibiting acetyl-CoA carboxylase 2 (ACC2) (23). These factors can also affect the relationship between FGF19 and TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, and TG. Serum FGF19 levels were not associated with age or sex in either the control group or the T1D group, which was consistent with previous studies (37,45). Previous studies found that serum FGF19 levels are lower in obese patients than in lean people and healthy controls (46). Friedrich et al. found that BMI was negatively associated with the fasting FGF19 level (47). In this study, we did not find a significant correlation between FGF19 and BMI or WHR. A possible explanation is that the subjects we recruited (healthy controls and T1D patients) were thinner than the average population and did not represent the general population. Therefore, we could not determine the correlation between FGF19 and BMI in this study. This study has several limitations. First, only changes in fasting serum FGF19 levels were investigated. While digestion has a significant effect on serum FGF19 levels (48), it also has effects on blood glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels. The relationship between postprandial FGF19 levels and these metabolic indicators is unclear and needs further exploration. Second, this is a cross-sectional study with a limited sample size, so it does not explain the causal relationship between decreased serum FGF19 levels and T1D. The specific role of decreased serum FGF19 levels in the pathogenesis of T1D requires further research to validate the conclusions of this study and clarify other issues.

Conclusions

Serum FGF19 levels in patients with T1D were lower than those in healthy controls. Serum FGF19 is associated with T1D, indicating that decreased FGF19 is a risk factor for T1D. The article’s supplementary files as
  48 in total

1.  Circulating intestinal fibroblast growth factor 19 has a pronounced diurnal variation and modulates hepatic bile acid synthesis in man.

Authors:  T Lundåsen; C Gälman; B Angelin; M Rudling
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Association of serum fibroblast growth factor 19 levels with visceral fat accumulation is independent of glucose tolerance status.

Authors:  X Hu; Q Xiong; Y Xu; X Zhang; X Pan; X Ma; Y Bao; W Jia
Journal:  Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.222

Review 3.  Follicular helper T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Feng Shao; Peilin Zheng; Di Yu; Zhiguang Zhou; Lijing Jia
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Phosphorylation of hepatic farnesoid X receptor by FGF19 signaling-activated Src maintains cholesterol levels and protects from atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Sangwon Byun; Hyunkyung Jung; Jinjing Chen; Young-Chae Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Bo Kong; Grace Guo; Byron Kemper; Jongsook Kim Kemper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Opposite alterations in FGF21 and FGF19 levels and disturbed expression of the receptor machinery for endocrine FGFs in obese patients.

Authors:  J M Gallego-Escuredo; J Gómez-Ambrosi; V Catalan; P Domingo; M Giralt; G Frühbeck; F Villarroya
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Fibroblast growth factor-19: development, analytical characterization and clinical evaluation of a new ELISA test.

Authors:  D Stejskal; M Karpísek; Z Hanulová; P Stejskal
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.713

7.  Fibroblast growth factor 19 protects the heart from oxidative stress-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy via activation of AMPK/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.

Authors:  Xin Li; Di Wu; Ye Tian
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Central action of FGF19 reduces hypothalamic AGRP/NPY neuron activity and improves glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Geneviève Marcelin; Young-Hwan Jo; Xiaosong Li; Gary J Schwartz; Ying Zhang; Nae J Dun; Rong-Ming Lyu; Clémence Blouet; Jaw K Chang; Streamson Chua
Journal:  Mol Metab       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 7.422

9.  Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Determinants in Newly-Diagnosed Adult-Onset Diabetes in China: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Xia Li; Chuqing Cao; Xiaohan Tang; Xiang Yan; Houde Zhou; Jing Liu; Linong Ji; Xilin Yang; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 10.  Microbiome and type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Heli Siljander; Jarno Honkanen; Mikael Knip
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.