| Literature DB >> 33842523 |
William R Tebar1, Diego G D Christofaro1, Tiego A Diniz2, Mara Cristina Lofrano-Prado3, Joao Paulo Botero4, Marilia de Almeida Correia5, Gabriel G Cucato6, Raphael Mendes Ritti-Dias5, Wagner Luiz do Prado7.
Abstract
Background: Elevated screen time has been associated with addictive behaviors, such as alcohol and sugar intake and smoking. Considering the substantial increase in screen time caused by social isolation policies, this study aimed to analyze the association of increased screen time in different devices during the COVID-19 pandemic with consumption and increased desire of alcohol, smoking, and sweetened foods in adults.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; dietary pattern; pandemic; sedentary behavior; substance use
Year: 2021 PMID: 33842523 PMCID: PMC8029649 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.630586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Characterization of sample (n = 1,896).
| Sex, female | 1,111 (58.6) |
| Educational level: | |
| Elementary | 11 (0.6) |
| High school | 158 (8.3) |
| College/graduated | 807 (42.6) |
| Post-graduation | 920 (48.5) |
| Feeling of stress | 481 (25.4) |
| Feeling of anxiety | 581 (30.6) |
| Feeling of depression | 252 (13.3) |
| Alcohol consumption | 1,245 (65.7) |
| Increased desire to alcohol drink during pandemic | 512 (27.0) |
| Smoking | 103 (5.4) |
| Increased desire to smoke during pandemic | 65 (3.4) |
| Sweetened foods consumption for ≥5 days/week | 711 (37.5) |
| Increased sweetened foods consumption during pandemic | 807 (42.6) |
| Use of screen device for physical activity | 709 (37.4) |
| Increased television time during pandemic | 1,294 (68.2) |
| Increased cellphone time during pandemic | 1,671 (88.1) |
| Increased computer time during pandemic | 1,391 (73.4) |
| Cluster of screen time increased during pandemic: | |
| Not increased in any device | 88 (4.6) |
| Increased in 1 device | 210 (11.1) |
| Increased in 2 devices | 635 (33.5) |
| Increase in the 3 devices | 963 (50.8) |
| Television time, h/day | 1.7 (1.3) |
| Cellphone time, h/day | 3.1 (1.2) |
| Computer time, h/day | 2.5 (1.6) |
| Total screen time, h/day | 7.2 (2.5) |
SD, standard deviation.
Association of increased time in screen devices with smoking, alcohol, sweetened food consumption, and increased desire during the COVID-19 pandemic in adults (n = 1,896).
| Increased television time ( | 1.07 (0.87; 1.31) | 0.97 (0.78; 1.20) | 0.97 (0.78; 1.21) | |||
| Increased cellphone time ( | 1.08 (0.80; 1.45) | 1.05 (0.76; 1.43) | 1.08 (0.79; 1.48) | 1.34 (0.94; 1.92) | 1.25 (0.86; 1.83) | 1.24 (0.84; 1.82) |
| Increased computer time ( | 0.88 (0.71; 1.10) | 0.95 (0.75; 1.22) | 0.87 (0.66; 1.14) | 0.87 (0.66; 1.14) | ||
| Increased television time ( | 0.90 (0.59; 1.36) | 0.89 (0.56; 1.40) | 0.87 (0.55; 1.38) | 0.81 (0.48; 1.39) | 0.71 (0.39; 1.30) | 0.58 (0.31; 1.09) |
| Increased cellphone time ( | 0.72 (0.41; 1.27) | 0.79 (0.43; 1.45) | 0.78 (0.42; 1.43) | 0.84 (0.38; 1.85) | 0.80 (0.34; 1.87) | 0.58 (0.24; 1.40) |
| Increased computer time ( | 0.70 (0.45; 1.07) | 0.66 (0.41; 1.06) | 0.71 (0.44; 1.14) | 0.73 (0.41; 1.30) | 0.62 (0.32; 1.18) | 0.60 (0.30; 1.18) |
| Increased television time ( | 1.15 (0.94; 1.40) | 1.02 (0.82; 1.27) | 1.02 (0.83; 1.27) | |||
| Increased cellphone time ( | 1.16 (0.86; 1.57) | 1.01 (0.73; 1.38) | 1.01 (0.73; 1.38) | 2.11 (1.54; 2.90) | ||
| Increased computer time ( | 0.93 (0.75; 1.14) | 1.12 (0.88; 1.43) | 1.16 (0.88; 1.53) | |||
Model 1: Adjusted by age, sex, educational level, feeling of stress, feeling of anxiety, feeling of depression, use of screen device for physical activity, and total screen time per day in each device; Model 2: Model 1 + adjusted mutually by a, b, and c, or by d, e, and f, according to the column; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Bold values were statistically significant at p < 0.05 level.
Association of the clustering of increased time in different devices with smoking, alcohol, sweetened food consumption, and increased desire during the COVID-19 pandemic in adults (n = 1,896).
| Screen time did not increase ( | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Increased time in 1 screen device ( | 1.04 (0.62; 1.73) | 1.01 (0.59; 1.73) | 1.06 (0.62; 1.81) | 1.24 (0.63; 2.44) | 1.20 (0.61; 2.34) | 1.21 (0.62; 2.38) |
| Increased time in 2 screen devices ( | 1.28 (0.80; 2.03) | 1.16 (0.71; 1.88) | 1.23 (0.75; 2.00) | 1.72 (0.93; 3.17) | 1.68 (0.92; 3.07) | 1.63 (0.89; 3.01) |
| Increased time in 3 screen devices ( | 1.11 (0.71; 1.74) | 0.85 (0.52; 1.38) | 0.90 (0.55; 1.46) | 1.79 (0.98; 3.27) | 1.62 (0.89; 2.97) | 1.56 (0.84; 2.87) |
| Screen time did not increase ( | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Increased time in 1 screen device ( | 0.88 (0.35; 2.25) | 0.86 (0.33; 2.23) | 0.86 (0.33; 2.24) | 0.56 (0.15; 2.14) | 0.81 (0.21; 3.16) | 0.68 (0.17; 2.69) |
| Increased time in 2 screen devices ( | 0.59 (0.25; 1.38) | 0.60 (0.25; 1.43) | 0.58 (0.24; 1.39) | 0.58 (0.18; 1.88) | 0.93 (0.28; 3.13) | 0.65 (0.19; 2.24) |
| Increased time in 3 screen devices ( | 0.63 (0.28; 1.43) | 0.61 (0.26; 1.44) | 0.61 (0.26; 1.47) | 0.50 (0.16; 1.56) | 0.66 (0.20; 2.20) | 0.45 (0.13; 1.55) |
| Screen time did not increase ( | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) |
| Increased time in 1 screen device ( | 0.66 (0.39; 1.10) | 0.60 (0.36; 1.02) | 0.60 (0.35; 1.02) | 1.34 (0.74; 2.43) | 1.00 (0.56; 1.79) | 1.08 (0.53; 2.21) |
| Increased time in 2 screen devices ( | 0.83 (0.53; 1.31) | 0.68 (0.43; 1.09) | 0.68 (0.43; 1.09) | 1.27 (0.75; 2.16) | 1.59 (0.84; 3.04) | |
| Increased time in 3 screen devices ( | 0.83 (0.53; 1.30) | |||||
Model 1: Adjusted by sex, age, educational level, use of screen device for physical activity, and total time spent in screen time per day; Model 2: Model 1 + adjusted mutually by a, b, and c, or by d, e, and f, according to the column; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Bold values were statistically significant at p < 0.05 level.