| Literature DB >> 33842360 |
Haichao Zhao1,2, Changzhou Chen1, Xidong Chen1, Chuanli Yang2, Donglin Zhang1, Yanjun Li1,2, Haoliang Zhao1,2, Jiefeng He1,2.
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is a highly malignant and lethal tumor. In addition to surgery, immunotherapy is currently a more effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) largely determines the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Based on the universal targeting of TIME modulators in clinical treatment, TIME modulators are promising targets for tumor immunotherapy. We investigated the effect of a double gene expression vector (recombinant galactose-terminal glycol-poly-L-lysine coupled MIP-3α-FL) on dendritic cells (DCs) regulation within the TIME of mice with liver cancer. H22 cells were transfected with a recombinant MIP-3α-FL plasmid to induce DCs differentiation and chemotaxis. The effects of transfection were investigated by flow cytometry following the modified Boyden's method. Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells co-culture revealed changes in the antigen presentation ability of DCs. Further, tumor-bearing mice were injected with the recombinant double gene vector via the tail vein. We compared the survival time, tumor volume, weight of the mice, as well as the number and phenotype of tumor-infiltrating DCs (TIDCs) between groups. The supernatant of transfected H22 cells promoted the phenotypic maturation of DCs, enhancing their chemotaxis. Further, treated DCs promoted the cytokine secretion and killing ability of CIK cells. The survival time of mice injected with the double gene vector was significantly prolonged, while their tumor weight and volume were relatively reduced. Flow cytometry revealed that the number of TIDCs (as well as CD80 and CD86 expression) in the MouseMIP-3α-FL group, were significantly higher than in the control group. The combination of MIP-3α and FL can significantly promote DCs aggregation, maturation, and enhance their antigen presentation ability. The coupling of the double gene vector with glycosylated polylysine can improve the precise targeting of the liver and inhibit tumor growth in vivo, providing a novel approach for immune therapy in liver cancer.Entities:
Keywords: FL; MIP-3α; dendritic cells; hepatocellular carcinoma; tumor immune microenvironment
Year: 2021 PMID: 33842360 PMCID: PMC8032989 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1MIP-3α-FL eukaryotic expression vector was introduced into H22 cells, increasing the expression and secretion of MIP-3α and FL. (A) The expression of the pGFP-MIP-3α-FL gene in H22 cells detected by RT-PCR before and after transfection (Lane 0: marker, lane 1: positive control, lane 2: H22 after transfection of recombinant plasmid, lane 3: H22 before transfection, and lane 4: negative control). (B) Scanning image of H22EV and H22MIP-3α-FL under a laser confocal microscope after transfection for 48 h (light focusing microscope, magnification ×100). (C) Detection of MIP-3α and FL secretion by ELISA. ***P<0.001. (D) The images of protein in H22EV and H22MIP-3α-FL as determined by western blot.
Figure 2H22 cells transfected with MIP-3α-FL can promote DC maturation and enhance the chemotaxis of DCs. (A) DC formed dendritic shapes (optical microscope, magnification ×100). (B) Flow cytometry results of DCs after different H22 supernatannt treatment. (C) Chemotactic effect of the MIP-3α-FL gene-modified H22 cell culture supernatant on DCs. (D) Colony suspension growth of CIK cells (optical microscope, magnification ×100). (E) Different groups of CCK-8 experimental OD values. *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
Comparison of CIK cell proliferation at different time points (%).
| Groups | 3 Days | 6 Days | 9 Days | 12 Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.7 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± 1.3 | 8.3 ± 2.1 | 15.3 ± 2.4 |
|
| 1.7 ± 0.5 | 5.6 ± 1.4 | 10.1 ± 2.2 | 21.9 ± 2.0a |
|
| 1.6 ± 0.4 | 5.8 ± 1.6 | 10.4 ± 1.8 | 22.2 ± 1.9b |
|
| 1.5 ± 0.4 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 17 ± 2.9 | 39.3 ± 2.9c |
Compared with CIK group, aP<0.05; Compared with CIK congroup, bP>0.05; Compared with CIK EVgroup, cP<0.05.
Comparison of the frequency of CD3+ CD8+ cells at different time points (%).
| Groups | 3 Days | 6 Days | 9 Days | 12 Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.8 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 15.5 ± 0.8 |
|
| 1.8 ± 0.2 | 6.3 ± 0.3 | 10.9 ± 0.4 | 23.7 ± 0.7a |
|
| 1.7 ± 0.3 | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 25.0 ± 0.5b |
|
| 1.6 ± 0.4 | 6.8 ± 0.2 | 15.8 ± 0.7 | 37.4 ± 0.9c |
Compared with CIK group, aP<0.05; Compared with CIK congroup, bP>0.05; Compared with CIK EVgroup,cP<0.05.
Comparison of cytokine secretion by CIK cells (pg/ml).
| Groups | IFN-γ | TNF-α |
|---|---|---|
|
| 84.9 ± 21.7 | 77.8 ± 25.9 |
|
| 189.4 ± 43.5 | 137.4 ± 40.4 |
|
| 190.8 ± 34.9 | 142.1 ± 50.1 |
|
| 317.5 ± 35.7 | 276.5 ± 40.6 |
Compared with CIKEV group, *P<0.05.
Comparison of CIK killing activity under different target - effector ratios (%).
| Target - Effector ratio | H22+CIK | H22+CIK con | H22+CIK EV | H22+CIK MIP-3α-FL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.69 ± 0.14 | 0. 72 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.12 | 0.76 ± 0.17 |
|
| 0.91 ± 0.27 | 1.24 ± 0.24 | 1.41 ± 0.09 | 1.68 ± 0.21 |
|
| 1.45 ± 0.19 | 1.99 ± 0.19 | 1.98 ± 0.22 | 3.20 ± 0.27 |
|
| 2.16 ± 0.19 | 3.11 ± 0.39 | 3.24 ± 0.36 | 4.02 ± 0.50 |
Killing activity (%) = [1- (experimental group OD value - OD value of individual effector cells)/OD value of target cells alone] × 100%.
Figure 3Comparison of transfection efficiency of different tissues. (A) The transfection efficiency mediated by G-PLL. (B) The transfection efficiency mediated by Lip. (C) Percentage of fluorescent cells in different organs mediated by G-PLL and Lip. (D) The expression of ASGP-R in different mouse tissues. (E) Relative expression of MIP-3α mRNA in the two groups of samples. (F) Relative expression of MIP-3α mRNA in the two groups of samples. ***P<0.001.
Figure 4The double gene expression vector can inhibit tumor growth in liver cancer model mice. (A) Mouse liver cancer picture. (B) Micrograph of a liver tissue section stained with H&E: liver tissue of the control group (left) and liver cancer tissue of the mouse model group (right) (H&E staining, magnification × 100). (C) Tumor images of the different groups of tumor models. (D) The results of tumor volume measurement in tumor-bearing mice. (E) The results of tumor weight measurement in tumor-bearing mice compared with the MouseMIP-3α-FL group. ***P<0.001.
Figure 5Comparison of TIDC quantity and maturity between the MouseMIP-3α-FL group, MouseEV group, and MousePBS group. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of CD11a, CD80, and CD86 in MouseMIP-3α-FL, MouseEV, MousePBS group of mice. (B) The frequencies of TIDCs in the three groups of mice. (C) The frequencies of CD80+ TIDCs in the three groups of mice. (D) The frequencies of CD86+TIDCs in the three groups of mice. ***P<0.001. (E) Comparison of the survival time curves of different mouse groups.