| Literature DB >> 33842349 |
Jie Wu1,2, Jun-Miao Wen2,3, Yu-Chen Wang1,2, Wen-Jie Luo1,2, Qi-Feng Wang2,4, Hong Lv2,4, Bo Dai1,2, Ding-Wei Ye1,2, Heng-Chuan Su1,2, Yi-Ping Zhu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of various diagnostic immunohistochemical (IHC) markers and develop an IHC-based classifier to predict the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; immunohistochemistry; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; prognosis; signature
Year: 2021 PMID: 33842349 PMCID: PMC8027317 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in discovery and validation cohort.
| Training cohort (n=256) | Validation cohort (n=110) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.649 | ||
| Male | 222 (86.7) | 98 (89.1) | |
| Female | 34 (12.3) | 12 (10.9) | |
| Age (year) | 0.990 | ||
| (Mean, SD) | 59.36 (9.91) | 59.35 (10.21) | |
| Depth of invasion (T stage) | 0.744 | ||
| Tis | 4 (1.6) | 2 (1.8) | |
| Ta | 14 (5.5) | 2 (1.8) | |
| T1 | 58 (22.7) | 27 (24.5) | |
| T2 | 70 (27.3) | 33 (30.0) | |
| T3 | 74 (28.9) | 31 (28.2) | |
| T4 | 36 (14.1) | 15 (13.6) | |
| Lymph node metastasis (N stage) | 0.416 | ||
| Negative | 198 (77.3) | 80 (72.7) | |
| Positive | 58 (22.7) | 30 (27.3) | |
| Grade | 0.830 | ||
| Low grade | 22 (8.6) | 8 (7.3) | |
| High grade | 234 (91.4) | 102 (92.7) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.894 | ||
| Absent | 178 (69.5) | 75 (68.2) | |
| Present | 78 (30.5) | 35 (31.8) | |
| Perineural invasion | 0.779 | ||
| Absent | 196 (76.6) | 82 (74.5) | |
| Present | 60 (23.4) | 28 (25.5) | |
| Surgical margin status | 1.000 | ||
| Negative | 232 (90.6) | 100 (90.9) | |
| Positive | 24 (9.4) | 10 (9.1) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.401 | ||
| (Mean, SD) | 3.74 (1.86) | 3.93 (2.03) | |
Figure 1(A) LASSO coefficient profiles of the selected IHC markers. (B) The tuning parameter (λ) selection used 10‐fold cross‐validation via minimum criteria. Partial likelihood deviance was plotted versus log(λ).
Figure 2Distribution of risk score based on 9-IHC-based classifier. (A) Training cohort. (B) Validation cohort.
Figure 3Comparison of DFS in low-risk and high-risk groups stratified by IHC signature. (A) Training cohort. (B) Validation cohort.
Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression analyses of DFS in bladder cancer patients.
| Covariates | Unadjusted analysis | Adjusted analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Age at surgery |
|
|
|
|
| Sex (male | 1.29 (0.72-3.09) | 0.286 | ||
| Invasion depth (NMIBC vs. MIBC) |
|
|
|
|
| Lymph node metastasis (N1 |
|
|
|
|
| Grade (low grade |
|
|
|
|
| Vascular invasion (present |
|
|
|
|
| Perineural invasion (present |
|
| 1.88 (0.97-3.62) | 0.060 |
| Surgical margin status (present |
|
|
|
|
| Tumor size |
|
|
|
|
| 9-IHC-based classifier (low risk |
|
|
|
|
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; NMIBC, non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; IHC, immunohistochemical.
Bold values and * indicate p < 0.05.
Figure 4ROC curve analyses of the prognostic value of IHC-based classifier and AJCC stage. (A) 1-year DFS. (B) 5-year DFS.
Figure 5The nomogram for predicting 1-, 5-, and 10-year DFS of bladder cancer patients receiving RC.
Figure 6Calibration curves of (A, C, and E) 1-, 5-, and 10-year DFS for training cohort. (B, D, and F) 1-, 5-, and 10-year DFS for validation cohort.