| Literature DB >> 33842002 |
Ke Ma1, Sitong Liu1, Hongyue Liang1, Guan Wang1, Tianyu Wang1, Shuya Luo1, Kuan Gao1, Hui Wang1, Mei Liu1, Lichuan Bai1, Qinghuan Xiao1.
Abstract
Introduction: Ca2+-activated Cl- channel TMEM16A is expressed in endothelial cells, and contributes to many diseases such as hypertension, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and pulmonary hypertension. It remains unclear whether TMEM16A regulates endothelial angiogenesis, which participates in many physiological and pathological processes. Cholesterol regulates many ion channels including TMEM16A, and high cholesterol levels contribute to endothelial dysfunction. It remains to be determined whether cholesterol regulates TMEM16A expression and function in endothelial cells. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether cholesterol regulated TMEM16A expression and function in endothelial angiogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: 5-aza, 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine; ANOVA, analysis of variance; Angiogenesis; CCK-8, Cell Counting Kit-8; CaCCs, Ca2+-activated Cl− currents; Cholesterol; DMEM, Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium; DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; EGTA, ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; Endothelial cells; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HAECs, human aortic endothelial cells; HEPES, N-2-hydroxyethil-piperazine-N'-2-ethanesulfonic acid; MβCD, methyl-β cyclodextrin; NMDG, N-methyl-D-glucamine; PVDF, polyvinylidene fluoride; RIPA, radio immunoprecipitation assay; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SE, standard error; TMEM16A; shRNAs, short hairpin RNAs
Year: 2020 PMID: 33842002 PMCID: PMC8020148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1TMEM16A mediated Ca2+-activated Cl− currents in HAECs. A. Representative whole-cell Cl− currents activated by different Ca2+ concentrations (0, 1, and 25 μM). The currents were elicited with 750-ms voltage steps from –100 mV to + 100 mV in 20 mV increments. B. The current–voltage relationship of Cl− currents activated by 0, 1, and 25 μM Ca2+. n = 4–5 cells. C. Western blot results of TMEM16A expression in HAECs treated with scrambled shRNAs and TMEM16A-shRNAs. n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs scrambled shRNA. D. Representative whole-cell Cl− currents activated by 25 μM Ca2+ in HAECs treated with scrambled shRNAs and TMEM16A-shRNAs. E. Mean current densities at + 100 mV in D. n = 5–6 cells. *p < 0.05 vs scrambled shRNA. F. H. The time course of Cl− currents activated by 25 μM Ca2+ in cells treated with the TMEM16A inhibitors CaCCinh-A01 (20 μM) (F) or T16Ainh-A01 (20 μM) (H). Cells were clamped from ramps from − 100 to + 100 mV with a 750-ms duration at 10 s intervals. The current was normalized to the peak current before CaCCinh-A01 or T16Ainh-A01 application. The application of CaCCinh-A01 or T16Ainh-A01 is indicated by the arrow. G. I. Representative current traces before (top) and after (bottom) CaCCinh-A01 (G) or T16Ainh-A01 (I) treatment. J. The normalized currents (Inormalized) before and after CaCCinh-A01 or T16Ainh-A01. The currents were normalized to those before application of these inhibitors. n = 4–6 cells. *p < 0.05 vs control (before treatment).
Fig. 2Cholesterol treatment inhibited TMEM16A expression in HAECs. A. B. Western blot results of TMEM16A expression in HAECs treated with different concentrations (0–25 μM) of cholesterol for 48 h (A) or MβCD (10 mM) for 0–2 h (B). n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs control. C. Representative TMEM16A Cl− currents activated by 25 μM Ca2+ in HAECs treated with or without 25 μM cholesterol for 48 h. D. The inhibitory percentage (inhibition%) of cholesterol in TMEM16A currents in HAECs in C. n = 4–5. *p < 0.05 vs control.
Fig. 3Cholesterol treatment inhibited TMEM16A expression in HAECs by upregulating DNMT1 expression. A. Western blot results of DNMT1 expression in HAECs treated with different concentrations of cholesterol. n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs control. B. Western blot results showed TMEM16A expression in HAECs treated with empty vector or DNMT1-overexpressing plasmids (DNMT1 OE). n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs vector. C. Representative whole-cell Cl− currents activated by 25 μM Ca2+ in HAECs treated with empty vector or DNMT1 OE plasmids. D. Mean current densities at + 100 mV in C. n = 5 cells. *p < 0.05 vs vector. E. Western blot results of TMEM16A expression in control HAECs or HAECs treated with 25 μM cholesterol in the presence or absence of 5-aza (10 μM). n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs control; #p < 0.05 vs cholesterol.
Fig. 4Cholesterol inhibited TMEM16A currents in HEK293 cells transfected with TMEM16A-overexpressing plasmids. A. The time course of TMEM16A currents at + 100 mV activated by 200 nM Ca2+ in HEK293 cells before (a) and after (b) cholesterol (20 μM) or vehicle control. Cells were clamped from ramps from − 100 to + 100 mV with a 750-ms duration at 10 s intervals. The currents were normalized to peak current before application of cholesterol or vehicle. B. Representative currents recorded before (a) and after (b) application of cholesterol or vehicle control in A. C. The representative currents before (a) and after (b) cholesterol treatment (20 μM). Currents were elicited with 750-ms voltage step from –100 mV to + 100 mV in 20 mV increments. D. Current ratio (I5min/I0) at 5 min after cholesterol application. I5min indicates the current at 5 min after the application of cholesterol. I0 indicates the current immediately before cholesterol application. n = 4 cells. *p < 0.05 vs control. E. I5min/I0 for different concentrations of cholesterol (0.01–100 μM). n = 4–6 cells. F. The inhibitory ratio (inhibition%) is plotted vs the cholesterol concentrations. The inhibition% was calculated as follows: inhibition%=(I0-I5min)/I0. The plot was fitted to the Hill equation with an IC50 = 0.1209 μM. G. The time course of TMEM16A currents activated by 200 nM Ca2+ in HEK293 cells before (a) and after (b) MβCD (2 mM). The voltage protocol is the same in A. The currents were normalized to the current before MβCD application. H. Representative currents recorded before (a) and after (b) MβCD application in G. I. The normalized currents (Inormalized) before and after MβCD application in G. n = 4. *p < 0.05 vs before MβCD application.
Fig. 5Cholesterol inhibited TMEM16A currents in HAECs. A. The time course of TMEM16A currents at +100 mV activated by 25 μM Ca2+ in HAECs before (a) and after (b) cholesterol (20 μM) application. Cells were clamped from ramps from −100 to +100 mV with a 750-ms duration at 10 s intervals. The currents were normalized to peak current before cholesterol application. B. Representative currents recorded before (a) and after (b) cholesterol application in A. C. Representative currents before (a) and after (b) cholesterol treatment (20 μM). Currents were elicited with 750-ms voltage step from –100 mV to +100 mV in 20 mV increments. D. The normalized currents (Inormalized) before and after cholesterol application. n = 4 cells.*p < 0.05 vs before cholesterol application.
Fig. 6TMEM16A channels inhibited angiogenic activities of HAECs. A. Representative images of tubular networks in Matrigel in HAECs transfected with Ad-TMEM16A-shRNAs (shRNA) and its scrambled control (Scrambled) or TMEM16A-overexpressing plasmids (TMEM16A OE) or empty vector (vector) control. B. C. Relative tube length (B) and the number of branching points (C) in A. n = 3. *p < 0.05 vs control. D. Representative images in wound healing assay showing the migration of HAECs transfected with Ad-TMEM16A-shRNAs (shRNA) and its scrambled control (Scrambled) or TMEM16A-overexpressing plasmids (TMEM16A OE) or empty vector (vector). E. Quantification results of wound healing assay in D. n = 4. *p < 0.05 vs control. F. CCK-8 assay showing the cell viability of HAECs transfected with Ad-TMEM16A-shRNAs (shRNA) and its scrambled control (Scrambled) or TMEM16A-overexpressing plasmids (TMEM16A OE) or empty vector (vector). n = 4. *p < 0.05 vs control.