| Literature DB >> 33841833 |
Davoud Salarbashi1,2, Mohsen Tafaghodi3,4, Bibi Sedigheh Fazly Bazzaz5,6, Seyyed Mohammad Aboutorabzade7, Morteza Fathi8.
Abstract
In the present work, the effect of various concentrations of SiO2 nanoparticles (5, 10, and 15%) on physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of soluble soybean polysaccharide (SSPS)-based film was investigated. Then, the migration of SiO2 nanoparticles to ethanol as a food simulant was evaluated. Subsequently, curcumin was added to the nanocomposite formulation to sense the pH changes. Finally, the cytotoxicity of the developed packaging system was investigated. With increasing nanoparticle concentration, the film thickness, water solubility, and water vapor permeability decreased and mechanical performance of the films improved. SSPS/SiO2 nanocomposite did not show antibacterial activity. SEM analysis showed that SiO2 nanoparticles are uniformly distributed in the SSPS matrix; however, some outstanding spots can be observed in the matrix. A very homogeneous surface was observed for neat SSPS film with R a and R q values of 3.48 and 4.26, respectively. With the incorporation of SiO2 (15%) into SSPS film, R a and R q values increased to 5.67 and 5.98, respectively. Small amount of SiO2 nanoparticles was released in food simulant. The nanocomposite incorporated with curcumin showed good physical properties and antibacterial activity. A strong positive correlation was observed between TVBN content of shrimp and a* values of the films during storage time (Pearson's correlation = 0.985).Entities:
Keywords: SiO2 nanoparticles; biodegradable films; intelligent packaging; soluble soybean polysaccharide
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841833 PMCID: PMC8020962 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Physical characteristics of the developed SSPS films as a function of SiO2 nanoparticle concentration*
| SiO2 content (%) | Thickness (mm) | Moisture content (%) | Water solubility (%) | WVP (×106 gm−1 s−1 pa−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.201 ± 0.003a | 21.02 ± 0.04a | 70.07 ± 0.07a | 7.06 ± 0.249b |
| 5 | 0.180 ± 0.001b | 16.12 ± 0.11b | 68.64 ± 0.62b | 5.93 ± 0.005c |
| 10 | 0.161 ± 0.004c | 15.91 ± 0.02c | 65.90 ± 0.08c | 7.46 ± 0.017b |
| 15 | 0.142 ± 0.005d | 15.86 ± 0.06c | 65.45 ± 0.04c | 8.97 ± 0.004a |
a, b, c, and d: Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 5%.
FIGURE 1The SEM images of SiO2‐free SSPS (S1 and C1), SSPS/SiO2 1% (S2 and C2), SSPS/SiO2 3% (S3 and C3), and SSPS/SiO2 5% (S4 and C4). The letters of C and S stand for “cross‐section” and “surface” profiles of the composites, respectively
FIGURE 2The AFM micrographs of SiO2‐free SSPS (a), SSPS/SiO2 (1%) (b), SSPS/SiO2 (3%) (c), and SSPS/SiO2 (5%) (d)
Mechanical characteristics of SSPS films incorporated with various concentrations of SiO2 nanoparticles*
| SiO2 content (wt. %) | Tensile strength (MPa) | Elongation at break (% ) |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 12.71 ± 0.02d | 30.15 ± 0.02b |
| 5 | 15.74 ± 0.03c | 25.31 ± 0.03c |
| 10 | 17.05 ± 0.06b | 31.85 ± 0.06b |
| 15 | 19.70 ± 0.01a | 38.32 ± 0.01a |
a, b, c, and d: Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 5%.
Physical properties of SSPS/SiO2 (15%)/curcumin films
| Sample | Moisture content (%) | Water solubility (%) | WVP (×106 gm−1 s−1 pa−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SSPS/SiO2 (15%) | 15.86 ± 0.06a | 65.45 ± 0.04a | 8.97 ± 0.00a |
| SSPS/SiO2 (15%)/curcumin | 7.01 ± 0.52b | 38.17 ± 1.98b | 0.14 ± 0.21b |
a, b, c, and d: Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences at 5%.
The values of MIC and MBC of curcumin and SSPS/SiO2 (15%)/curcumin nanocomposites
| Compounds | Bacteria: PTCC number or DSMZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. e.1 | S. e.2 | B. s. | S. a. | |
| MIC | ||||
| Curcumin | 31 | 125 | 31 | 31 |
| Curcumin + nanocomposite | 62 | 500 | 62 | 62 |
| MBC | ||||
| Curcumin | 31 | 125 | 125 | 31 |
| Curcumin + nanocomposite | 31 | 125 | 125 | 31 |
S. a.: Staphylococcus aureus (PTCC 1,112), S. e. 1.: Staphylococcus epidermidis (PTCC 1,114), S. e.2: S. epidermidis (DSMZ 3,270), B. s.: Bacillus subtilis (PTCC 1,023), PTCC, Persian Type Culture Collection.
The cytotoxicity of curcumin and SSPS/SiO2 (15%)/curcumin nanocomposites
| Compounds | Cell line | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | cho | hek | 4t1 | |
| Curcumin | 61.1 ± 6.5 | 81.83 ± 7.8 | 84.68 ± 9.5 | 62.8 ± 6.5 |
| Curcumin + SSPS nanocomposite | 56.45 ± 5.4 | 70.54 ± 7.4 | 65.49 ± 12.5 | 50 ± 7.2 |
IC50 of curcumin and the curcumin‐loaded nanocomposite (μg/ml).
FIGURE 3The pH response of the smart film in contact with acid (a), neutral, (b) and alkali (c) conditions
FIGURE 4Application of LISG/curcumin film for monitoring shrimp freshness (a: a* values of the films over storage time and b: TVBN content of shrimp samples over storage time)