| Literature DB >> 33841814 |
Julio C Rubio-Rodríguez1, Rosalia Reynoso-Camacho2, Nuria Rocha-Guzmán3, Luis M Salgado1.
Abstract
Hypercaloric beverages increase the prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), diets with polyphenolic compounds improved these alterations. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of the consumption of three functional beverages (prepared with: Roselle, green tea, cinnamon, Malabar tamarind, and peppermint in different proportions) on insulin resistance and NAFLD and their relation to liver phospholipid regulation in Wistar rats fed with a high-fat and fructose (HFF) diet. The consumption of beverages showed lower liver triglycerides compared to HFF control group, being the called beverage B the successful triggering up to 30.1%. The consumption of functional beverages improved insulin resistance and decreased the abundance of LysoPC (20:2), LysoPC (16:0), LysoPC (14:0), LysoPE (18:0), LysoPC (15:0), and LysoPC (20:1), with beverage C being the one with the meaningful effect. The results indicate that the functional beverage consumption improves insulin resistance, and decrease the degree of NAFLD, these through modifications of lysophosphatidylcholines, and lipids metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease); functional beverage; insulin resistance; lipids metabolism; lysophospholipids
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841814 PMCID: PMC8020945 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2162
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Total polyphenolic content and antioxidant activity of functional beverages
| Assay | Beverage | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | |
| Total phenols1 | 84.38 ± 0.37c | 114.51 ± 2.16a | 96.67 ± 1.92b |
| Total flavonoids2 | 8.61 ± 0.8c | 10.43 ± 0.7b | 12.69 ± 1.4a |
| Total anthocyanin3 | 24.21 ± 1.3 | LDL | LDL |
| DPPH•4 | 13.5 ± 1.1a | 8.9 ± 0.8b | 9.2 ± 0.5b |
| ABTS•+ 4 | 11.4 ± 0.3a | 9.6 ± 0.6b | 10.4 ± 0.6ab |
Values were expressed as 1mg GAE dL‐1, 2mg CE dL‐1, 3mg D3GE dL‐1 y 4maximum effective concentration (IC50; mg/mL). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant statistical difference (p < .05), with the Tukey‐Kramer test.
Abbreviations: CE, catechin equivalents; D3GE, delphinidin‐3‐glucoside equivalents; GAE, gallic acid equivalents.
FIGURE 1Effect of functional beverages on liver lipids. (a) quantification of liver triglycerides Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). *Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) as compared to the SD control by Dunnet test. Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) between HFF control and groups HFF treated with beverages by Dunnet test. (b) Liver tissue microphotography stained with hematoxylin and eosin. SD, group fed with standard diet and HFF, group fed with high fat and fructose
Effect of the consumption of functional beverages on serum lipid profile, triglycerides, and liver function enzymes activity in HFF‐diet‐fed obese rats
| Parameters | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | AST1 | ALT1 | Triglycerides2 | HDL2 | LDL2 | Total cholesterol2 |
|
| ||||||
| Control | 28.7 ± 3.2 | 15.1 ± 6.3 | 103.52 ± 8.3 | 28.77 ± 5.1 | 13.17 ± 2.2 | 149.9 ± 6.3 |
| A + | 26.0 ± 4.4 | 19.4 ± 1.9* | 98.38 ± 9.5 | 30.19 ± 5.9 | 15.23 ± 1.5 | 156.5 ± 11.3 |
| B + | 25.4 ± 2.9 | 21.3 ± 4.6* | 96.80 ± 9.8 | 35.63 ± 7.4 | 14.95 ± 2.0 | 141.8 ± 16.3 |
| C + | 31.2 ± 5.4 | 25.6 ± 5.8* | 99.49 ± 12.4 | 33.68 ± 7.9 | 14.42 ± 2.7 | 144.3 ± 11.7 |
| HFF | ||||||
| Control | 34.6 ± 2.5 | 40.9 ± 6.0* | 133.08 ± 20.2* | 20.07 ± 6.0 | 18.74 ± 2.7 | 141.7 ± 10.5 |
| A + HFF | 24.4 ± 3.6Ꞩ | 33.6 ± 7.8* | 127.47 ± 22.2* | 19.44 ± 5.7* | 16.11 ± 1.5 | 151.0 ± 10.9 |
| B + HFF | 29.5 ± 4.3 | 30.9 ± 4.2*,Ꞩ | 120.98 ± 13.6 | 23.65 ± 6.7 | 15.33 ± 1.8 | 147.9 ± 14.6 |
| C + HFF | 27.5 ± 5.9 | 38.5 ± 6.5* | 115.15 ± 15.9 | 33.92 ± 7.5Ꞩ | 16.97 ± 0.9 | 153.3 ± 13.5 |
Values are expressed as 1UL‐1 and 2mg dl‐1. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). *Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) as compared to the SD control between beverages treated with SD, by Dunnet test. Ꞩ Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) between HFF control and groups HFF treated with beverages by Dunnet test.
Abbreviations: HFF, high fat and fructose; SD, standard diet.
Effect of the consumption of functional beverages on glucose, insulin, HOMA index in rats fed with HFF
| Beverage | Parameter | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose1 | Insulin2 | HOMA‐IR | |
| Healthy control | 112.64 ± 10.3 | 1.80 ± 0.5 | 12.1 ± 3.3 |
| A + | 125.31 ± 21.9 | 1.93 ± 0.7 | 17.3 ± 2.9 |
| B + | 110.03 ± 17.6 | 2.36 ± 0.3 | 14.2 ± 4.8 |
| C + | 115.54 ± 9.1 | 1.79 ± 0.6 | 12.5 ± 4.0 |
| HFF control | 139.70 ± 26.0 | 5.74 ± 1.0* | 38.7 ± 5.9* |
| A + HFF | 133.91 ± 21.5 | 4.15 ± 1.0*,Ꞩ | 29.5 ± 4.5 *,Ꞩ |
| B + HFF | 132.09 ± 22.1 | 3.23 ± 0.8*,Ꞩ | 19.9 ± 4.4Ꞩ |
| C + HFF | 129.44 ± 17.5 | 2.95 ± 0.7Ꞩ | 24.4 ± 5.4*,Ꞩ |
Values are expressed as 1mg dl‐1, and 2ng ml‐1. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 8). *Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) as compared to the SD control by Dunnet test. Ꞩ Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) between HFF control and groups HFF treated with beverages by Dunnet test.
Abbreviations: HFF, group fed with high fat and fructose; SD, group fed with standard diet.
FIGURE 2Multivariate analysis of liver lysophospholipids of rats fed with HFF and treated with functional beverages. Heat map (a), PCA plots analysis (b), and PLSDA plots analysis (c). Data analysis (n = 5). SD, group fed standard diet and HFF, group fed with high fat and fructose
FIGURE 3Lysophospholipids identified based on VIP scores in liver of rats fed with HFF and functional beverages. Partial least squares discriminant analysis [PLSDA] variable importance in projection [VIP] plot in liver (a), and Intensities of lysophospholipids (VIP > 1.2) in liver (b). Data analysis (n = 5). SD, group fed with standard diet and HFF, group fed with high fat and fructose. *Indicate statistical difference (p < .05) as compared to the SD control by Dunnet test