Priyanka Mishra1, Anuj Bhargava2, Neha Nigam-Gupta3. 1. Junior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, M.P, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia, Hospital Bhopal, M.P, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Dentistry, Gandhi Medical College and Hamidia Hospital, Bhopal, M.P, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gingivitis is one of the most prevalent oral disease in humans. The most important etiological factor of gingivitis is dental plaque. Plaque control procedures comprises of several mechanical and chemical methods. Many studies have advocated that chemical plaque control methods can be used successfully as an adjunct to mechanical plaque control procedures. Thus, the aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two topical antimicrobial gels as an adjunct to mechanical plaque control over a period of 2 weeks in treatment of chronic gingivitis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single blind, two arm parallel design pilot clinical study including 60 systemically healthy patients with 1) chronic generalized gingivitis (MGI>1), 2) probing depth ≤ 3mm and 3) zero clinical attachment loss. The study participants were randomly assigned into two groups i.e., Group I- Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) gel, Group II- combination gel of Chlorhexidine gluconate and Metronidazole (CHX-MTZ) gel. Clinical parameters viz. Gingival Index (GI) and Modified Sulcus bleeding index (MSBI) were recorded firstly at baseline after Scaling and Root Planing(SRP), and secondly at the end of the study period of two weeks. Intra and inter-group comparisons of clinical parameters were done using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There was high significant reduction in GI and MSBI scores at the end of 2 weeks period in both the groups. Further, combination gel of Group II (CHX+MTZ) was found to be statistically more effective as compared to Group I (CHX) used alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that Chemotherapeutic agents like CHX and combination CHX-MTZ Gel are clinically effective as adjunct to Scaling and Root Planning(SRP) in treatment of Chronic Gingivitis. Further, post statistical comparative analysis has proved CHX-MTZ combination gel regime to be more clinically effective than CHX gel used alone in treatment of Chronic Gingivitis as adjunct to SRP. Key words:Scaling and Root Planning (SRP), Chronic Gingivitis, Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) gel, Combination (CHX+MTZ) Gel, Metronidazole (MTZ). Copyright:
BACKGROUND: Gingivitis is one of the most prevalent oral disease in humans. The most important etiological factor of gingivitis is dental plaque. Plaque control procedures comprises of several mechanical and chemical methods. Many studies have advocated that chemical plaque control methods can be used successfully as an adjunct to mechanical plaque control procedures. Thus, the aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two topical antimicrobial gels as an adjunct to mechanical plaque control over a period of 2 weeks in treatment of chronic gingivitis patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single blind, two arm parallel design pilot clinical study including 60 systemically healthy patients with 1) chronic generalized gingivitis (MGI>1), 2) probing depth ≤ 3mm and 3) zero clinical attachment loss. The study participants were randomly assigned into two groups i.e., Group I- Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) gel, Group II- combination gel of Chlorhexidine gluconate and Metronidazole (CHX-MTZ) gel. Clinical parameters viz. Gingival Index (GI) and Modified Sulcus bleeding index (MSBI) were recorded firstly at baseline after Scaling and Root Planing(SRP), and secondly at the end of the study period of two weeks. Intra and inter-group comparisons of clinical parameters were done using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS: There was high significant reduction in GI and MSBI scores at the end of 2 weeks period in both the groups. Further, combination gel of Group II (CHX+MTZ) was found to be statistically more effective as compared to Group I (CHX) used alone. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that Chemotherapeutic agents like CHX and combination CHX-MTZ Gel are clinically effective as adjunct to Scaling and Root Planning(SRP) in treatment of Chronic Gingivitis. Further, post statistical comparative analysis has proved CHX-MTZ combination gel regime to be more clinically effective than CHX gel used alone in treatment of Chronic Gingivitis as adjunct to SRP. Key words:Scaling and Root Planning (SRP), Chronic Gingivitis, Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) gel, Combination (CHX+MTZ) Gel, Metronidazole (MTZ). Copyright:
Authors: N J Kassebaum; A G C Smith; E Bernabé; T D Fleming; A E Reynolds; T Vos; C J L Murray; W Marcenes Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 6.116