Literature DB >> 33841562

Closed tracheal suctioning systems in the era of COVID-19: is it time to consider them as a gold standard?

Guglielmo Imbriaco1,2, Alessandro Monesi1,2.   

Abstract

Tracheal suctioning is one of the most common activities performed in intensive care units (ICU) and is recognised as a high-risk procedure by the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Aerosol-generating procedures on critical patients with COVID-19 present an increased risk of contamination for medical workers. In the time of the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic, with a massive number of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU, the open tracheal suction technique (OTST) represents a serious threat for medical workers, even if they are wearing full personal protective equipment. Closed tracheal suction systems (CTSS) allow the removal of tracheobronchial secretions without disconnecting ventilatory circuits, preventing alveolar derecruitment, gas exchange deterioration and hypoxia. CTSS reduce the risk of pathogens entering the respiratory circuit and appear to be a cost-effective solution. CTSS should be considered mandatory for patients in the ICU with an artificial airway, in order to reduce bioaerosol exposure risk for medical workers and contamination of the surrounding environment.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Tracheal suction; healthcare professional protection; intensive care

Year:  2020        PMID: 33841562      PMCID: PMC7841712          DOI: 10.1177/1757177420963775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Prev        ISSN: 1757-1782


  4 in total

Review 1.  Closed tracheal suction systems versus open tracheal suction systems for mechanically ventilated adult patients.

Authors:  M Subirana; I Solà; S Benito
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 2.  Impact of closed versus open tracheal suctioning systems for mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Akira Kuriyama; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Jun Fujinaga; Tadaaki Takada
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Aerosol generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Khai Tran; Karen Cimon; Melissa Severn; Carmem L Pessoa-Silva; John Conly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?

Authors:  Prateek Bahl; Con Doolan; Charitha de Silva; Abrar Ahmad Chughtai; Lydia Bourouiba; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.759

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Sensitivity and specificity of heat and moisture exchange filters sampling for SARS-CoV-2 detection in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Toufik Kamel; Clémence Guillaume; Grégoire Muller; Lekbir Baala; Thierry Boulain
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 10.273

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.