Alexander Cuncannon1, Aliyah Dosani1,2,3, Olive Fast1. 1. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Community and Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada. 2. Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 3. O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Worldwide disparities in surgical capacity are a significant contributor to health inequalities. Safe surgery and infection prevention and control depend on effective sterile processing (SP) of surgical instruments; however, little is known about SP in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where surgical site infection is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. AIM: To appraise and synthesise available evidence on SP in LMICs. METHODS: An integrative review of research literature was conducted on SP in LMICs published between 2010 and 2020. Studies were appraised and synthesised to identify challenges and opportunities in practice and research. RESULTS: Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Challenges to advancing SP include limited available evidence, resource constraints and policy-practice gaps. Opportunities for advancing SP include tailored education and mentoring initiatives, emerging partnerships and networks that advance implementation guidelines and promote best practices, identifying innovative approaches to resource constraints, and designing and executing quality assurance and surveillance programmes. DISCUSSION: Research investigating safe surgery, including SP, in LMICs is increasing. Further research and evidence are needed to confirm the generalisability of study findings and effectiveness of strategies to improve SP practice in LMICs. This review will help researchers and stakeholders identify opportunities to contribute. The burdens of unsafe surgery transcend geopolitical borders, and the global surgery and research communities are called upon to negotiate historical and present-day inequities to achieve safe surgery for all.
BACKGROUND: Worldwide disparities in surgical capacity are a significant contributor to health inequalities. Safe surgery and infection prevention and control depend on effective sterile processing (SP) of surgical instruments; however, little is known about SP in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where surgical site infection is a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. AIM: To appraise and synthesise available evidence on SP in LMICs. METHODS: An integrative review of research literature was conducted on SP in LMICs published between 2010 and 2020. Studies were appraised and synthesised to identify challenges and opportunities in practice and research. RESULTS: Eighteen papers met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Challenges to advancing SP include limited available evidence, resource constraints and policy-practice gaps. Opportunities for advancing SP include tailored education and mentoring initiatives, emerging partnerships and networks that advance implementation guidelines and promote best practices, identifying innovative approaches to resource constraints, and designing and executing quality assurance and surveillance programmes. DISCUSSION: Research investigating safe surgery, including SP, in LMICs is increasing. Further research and evidence are needed to confirm the generalisability of study findings and effectiveness of strategies to improve SP practice in LMICs. This review will help researchers and stakeholders identify opportunities to contribute. The burdens of unsafe surgery transcend geopolitical borders, and the global surgery and research communities are called upon to negotiate historical and present-day inequities to achieve safe surgery for all.
Keywords:
Sterile processing; global health; health equity; infection prevention; low- and middle-income countries; surgical instruments; surgical site infection
Authors: David Beran; Peter Byass; Aiah Gbakima; Kathleen Kahn; Osman Sankoh; Stephen Tollman; Miles Witham; Justine Davies Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Jared A Forrester; Luca A Koritsanszky; Demisew Amenu; Alex B Haynes; William R Berry; Seifu Alemu; Fekadu Jiru; Thomas G Weiser Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Olive M Fast; Hareya Gebremedhin Teka; Mussie Alemayehu/Gebreselassie; Christina Marie Danielle Fast; Dan Fast; Faith-Michael E Uzoka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: K A Sonderman; I Citron; S Mukhopadhyay; K Albutt; K Taylor; D Jumbam; K R Iverson; M Nthele; A Bekele; E Rwamasirabo; S Maongezi; M L Steer; R Riviello; W Johnson; J G Meara Journal: BJS Open Date: 2019-07-24
Authors: Jean Boubour; Katherine Jenson; Hannah Richter; Josiah Yarbrough; Z Maria Oden; Douglas A Schuler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 3.240