| Literature DB >> 33841530 |
Fereshteh Mehri1, Firouzeh Nazari2, Zohreh Fasihi1, Farzad Kobarfard3,4.
Abstract
A sensitive method using ion-pair extraction was developed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for measurement of 4-methylimidazole (4-MI) in NMRI mice plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Detection was done by electrospray positive ionization mass spectrometry in the multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The validation method was applied to quantification of 4-MI in plasma and CSF samples using oral doses of 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg in NMRI mice. The efficiency of the method was evaluated in terms of linearity (R 2> 0.99), recovery (98-107%, 3 levels) and precision (8-10%, 3 levels, n = 6). Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 25 ng/mL and 50 ng/mL, respectively. The results obtained showed that the exposure to oral doses of 4-MI in mice makes different concentrations in plasma and CSF and causes significant changes in mice. This study was the first report for determination of 4-MI in plasma and CSF samples in mice. Our results suggest that LC-MS/MS-based on ion-pair extraction is a robust method with high detection ability for measurement of 4-MI in plasma and CSF samples. Therefore, the developed method can be useful for evaluation and monitoring of imidazole derivatives in biological samples.Entities:
Keywords: 4-Methylimidazole; Cerebrospinal fluid; LC-MS/MS; NMRI mice; Plasma
Year: 2020 PMID: 33841530 PMCID: PMC8019872 DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.112406.13740
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
MRM transitions and collision energies for 4-Methylimidazol and 2-chloropryidine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 20 | 42 | 83 | 82.11 | 4-Methylimidazol |
| 100 | 20 | 56 | 83 | 82.11 | 4-Methylimidazol |
| 80 | 40 | 78 | 114 | 113.54 | 2-chloroprydine |
Chromatographic retention data, regression analysis, limits of detection and limit of quantification for 4-MI.
| Concentration range ng/mL: n = 18 | Retention time (min) | Regression Equation | R2 | LOD (ng/mL) | LOQ (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-1000 | 4.9 | Y = 0.003x-0.018 | 0.999 | 25 | 50 |
Notes: LOD, the limit of detection; LOQ, the limit of quantification.
Recovery, (Intra- and inter-assay) and precision values for determination of 4-MI
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration(ng/mL) | 75 | 250 | 750 | 75 | 250 | 750 |
| Mean | 0.20 | 1.03 | 2.66 | 0.21 | 1.06 | 2.62 |
| SD | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.027 | 0.06 | 0.10 |
| CV (%) | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| RE% (mean) | 101.11 | 98.00 | 107.73 | 104.24 | 99.00 | 109.11 |
Notes: SD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation, RE, recovery. Intra-assay experiments were performed by preparing 6 replicates of plasma samples. Inter-assay experiments were performed by repeatedly analyzing samples in different runs over 6 days.
Figure 1Representative chromatograms of 4-MI (m/z 83.59) in (A) Scan mode (B) SIM mode (C) product ion mode (D) MRM mode
Figure 2Representative chromatograms of 2-chloroprydine (I.S) (m/z 144.78) in (A) Scan mode (B) MRM mode (C) product Ion mode
Plasma and CSF concentration of 4-MI after oral administration with different dosing in mic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.63 ± 0.1 | 14 | 20 | 100 mg/kg | Plasma |
| 1.5 ± 0.6 | 16 | 20 | 200 mg/kg | |
| 2.6 ± 0.9 | 17 | 20 | 300 mg/kg | |
| Lower of LOD | ND | 20 | 100 mg/kg | CSF |
| 0.05 ± 0.01 | 16 | 20 | 200 mg/kg | |
| .0.09 ± 0.04 | 16 | 20 | 300 mg/kg | |
| NDa | ND | 10 | saline | control |
1a N.D: not detected.
Figure 3Representative MRM chromatograms of (4-MI m/z 83.59) and (2-chloroprydine I.S. m/z 144.78) in control group: (A) blank CSF and (C) blank plasma, in treatment group after oral administration with 4-MI at a single dose of 200 mg/kg to mice; (B) extracted CSF; (D) extracted Plasma