| Literature DB >> 33841498 |
Zixian Wang1,2,3,4, Hui Chen1,2,3, Min Qin1,2,3, Chen Liu5, Qilin Ma6, Xiaoping Chen7, Ying Zhang8, Weihua Lai2, Xiaojuan Zhang2, Shilong Zhong1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Plasma lipids have been at the center stage of the prediction and prevention strategies for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and novel lipidomic traits have been recognized as reliable biomarkers for CVD risk prediction. The mitochondria serve as energy supply sites for cells and can synthesize a variety of lipids autonomously. Therefore, investigating the relationships between mitochondrial single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) and plasma lipidomic traits is meaningful. Here, we enrolled a total of 1,409 Han Chinese patients with coronary artery disease from three centers and performed linear regression analyses on the SNPs of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and lipidomic traits in two independent groups. Sex, age, aspartate aminotransferase, estimated glomerular filtration rate, antihypertensive drugs, hypertension, and diabetes were adjusted. We identified three associations, namely, D-loop m.16089T>C with TG(50:4) NL-16:0, D-loop m.16145G>A with TG(54:5) NL-18:0, and D-loop m.16089T>C with PC(16:0_16:1) at the statistically significant threshold of FDR < 0.05. Then, we explored the relationships between mitochondrial genetic variants and traditional lipids, including triglyceride, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Two significant associations were found, namely MT-ND6 m.14178T>C with TC and D-loop m.215A>G with LDLC. Furthermore, we performed linear regression analysis to determine on the SNPs of mtDNA and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and found that the SNP D-loop m.16145G>A was nominally significantly associated with LVEF (P = 0.047). Our findings provide insights into the lipidomic context of mtDNA variations and highlight the importance of studying mitochondrial genetic variants related to lipid species.Entities:
Keywords: association analyses; coronary artery disease; lipidomic; mitochondrial DNA; polymorphisms
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841498 PMCID: PMC8027325 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.630359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Baseline characteristics of the two groups.
| Characteristics | Value | |
| Group I | Group II | |
| Size | 914 | 495 |
| Age | 62.90 ± 10.06 | 61.98 ± 9.81 |
| Sex (male) | 733 (80.20) | 367 (74.14) |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.14 ± 3.10 | 24.13 ± 3.07 |
| Comorbidities | ||
| Arrhythmia | 78 (8.53) | 44 (8.89) |
| Diabetes | 251 (27.46) | 141 (28.48) |
| Heart failure | 77 (8.42) | 221 (44.65) |
| Hypertension | 546 (59.74) | 300 (60.61) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 101 (11.05) | 66 (13.33) |
| ALT, U/L | 27.54 ± 12.99 | 25.82 ± 18.71 |
| AST, U/L | 26.76 ± 10.77 | 26.13 ± 39.12 |
| CK, U/L | 114.09 ± 115.89 | 122.87 ± 352.43 |
| eGFR, ml/min/1.73 m2 | 95.85 ± 77.82 | 95.51 ± 126.21 |
| CKMB, U/L | 7.60 ± 6.08 | 12.58 ± 13.73 |
| TC, mmol/L | 4.25 ± 1.09 | 4.28 ± 1.78 |
| LDLC, mmol/L | 2.56 ± 0.90 | 2.70 ± 0.97 |
| HDLC, mmol/L | 0.96 ± 0.25 | 0.99 ± 0.25 |
| TRIG, mmol/L | 1.61 ± 1.13 | 1.84 ± 1.90 |
| GLUC, mmol/L | 6.66 ± 2.64 | 5.95 ± 2.12 |
| Lpa, mg/L | 306.68 ± 325.61 | 287.03 ± 332.98 |
| APOA, g/L | 1.04 ± 0.28 | 1.17 ± 0.24 |
| BNP, pg/mL | 782.52 ± 1658.15 | 1066.73 ± 3209.70 |
| β-blockers | 810 (88.62) | 427 (86.26) |
| ACEIs | 580 (63.46) | 239 (48.28) |
| CCBs | 253 (27.68) | 150 (30.30) |
| PPIs | 445 (48.69) | 346 (69.90) |
| SYNTAX | 16.37 ± 10.71 | 15.97 ± 13.35 |
Significant associations of mitochondrial genetic variants with lipid species.
| Lipid species | mtSNP | Gene/region | Test | EAF | Effect | SE | FDR | heterogeneity | |||
| TG(50:4) NL-16:0 | m.16089T > C | T > C | 0.98 | 0.65 | 0.18 | 0.00035 | 0.01462 | 0.01410 | 0.00929 | 0.78 | |
| TG(54:5) NL-18:0 | m.16145G > A | A > G | 0.01 | −0.54 | 0.17 | 0.00111 | 0.04670 | 0.02215 | 0.00403 | 0.08 | |
| PC(16:0_16:1) | m.16089T > C | T > C | 0.98 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.00113 | 0.04759 | 0.01040 | 0.03987 | 0.62 | |
| TG(58:9) NL-20:4 | m.15924A > G | A > G | 0.99 | 0.63 | 0.21 | 0.00256 | 0.10756 | 0.04615 | 0.01651 | 0.41 | |
| Cer(m18:1/26:0) | m.16217T > C | T > C | 0.87 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.00401 | 0.16859 | 0.04969 | 0.00794 | 0.10 | |
| TG(58:3) NL-18:2 | m.16217T > C | T > C | 0.87 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.00567 | 0.23801 | 0.04579 | 0.02383 | 0.22 | |
| CE(18:1) | m.6680T > C | T > C | 0.91 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.00749 | 0.20076 | 0.04293 | 0.04623 | 0.33 |
FIGURE 1Manhattan plots for the significant associations of mitochondrial genetic variants with lipid species. PC, phosphatidylcholines, TG, triacylglycerol. (A) The red dashed line indicates the threshold of nominal significance on lipid species (P < 0.05). (B) The red dashed line indicates the threshold of statistical significance on lipid species after corrected (FDR < 0.05).
Relationships of mtDNA variations with traditional lipids (P < 0.05).
| Lipid | mtSNP | Gene/region | Test | Effect | SE | FDR | |
| TC | m.14178T > C | T > C | 1.45 | 0.34 | 0.000016 | 0.000691 | |
| m.215A > G | A > G | 1.08 | 0.36 | 0.002684 | 0.056354 | ||
| m.6680T > C | T > C | 0.28 | 0.13 | 0.026426 | 0.369958 | ||
| m.12811T > C | T > C | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.036252 | 0.380642 | ||
| m.3010G > A | G > A | −0.23 | 0.12 | 0.045509 | 0.382271 | ||
| LDLC | m.215A > G | A > G | 0.80 | 0.24 | 0.001098 | 0.046129 | |
| m.6680T > C | T > C | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.002930 | 0.061529 | ||
| m.12811T > C | T > C | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.006208 | 0.086907 | ||
| m.3010G > A | G > A | −0.20 | 0.08 | 0.012639 | 0.132706 | ||
| m.7684T > C | T > C | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.015906 | 0.133611 | ||
| HDLC | m.6680T > C | T > C | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.009879 | 0.203592 | |
| m.12811T > C | T > C | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.010075 | 0.203592 | ||
| m.7684T > C | T > C | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.014542 | 0.203592 | ||
| m.7853G > A | G > A | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.025186 | 0.245955 | ||
| m.11914G > A | G > A | −0.06 | 0.03 | 0.029280 | 0.245955 |
FIGURE 2Box plots for the SNPs m.14178T > C and m.215A > G against the levels of TC and LDLC. Five lines from top to bottom for each box were upper extreme, upper quartile, median, lower quartile, and lower extreme. Whiskers were drawn between upper extreme and upper quartile, lower quartile and lower extreme, and the dots above upper extreme or below lower extreme were outliers. (A) The SNP m.14178T > C (T > C) in MT-ND6 against the level of TC. (B) The SNP m.215A > G (A > G) in D-loop against the level of LDLC.
Relationships of mtDNA variations with LVEF (P < 0.05).
| mtSNP | Gene/region | Test | Effect | SE | FDR | |
| m.1048C > T | C > T | −5.84 | 2.40 | 0.01509 | 0.63390 | |
| m.12705C > T | T > C | −1.37 | 0.66 | 0.03899 | 0.65863 | |
| m.16145G > A | G > A | −5.58 | 2.81 | 0.04705 | 0.65863 |
FIGURE 3Schematic view of the association analyses results. (A) The nominally significant (P < 0.05) SNPs of mtDNA with lipid species, traditional lipids, and heart function were presented. TG, triacylglycerol; PC, phosphatidylcholines; CE, cholesteryl esters; Cer, ceramides; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; TRIG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDLC, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDLC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. (B) Venn diagram showed the intersection of these nominally significant SNPs in lipid species, traditional lipids, and LVEF. (C) Venn diagram showed the intersection of the nominally significant SNPs in the traditional lipids, including TC, LDLC, and HDLC.
FIGURE 4Box plots for the SNP m.16145G > A against the levels of TG(54:5) NL-18:0 and LVEF. TG, triacylglycerol; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. (A) The SNP m.16145G > A (G > A) in D-loop against the level of TG(54:5) NL-18:0 in the Group I. (B) The SNP m.16145G > A (G > A) in D-loop against the level of TG(54:5) NL-18:0 in the Group II. (C) The SNP m.16145G > A (G > A) in D-loop against the level of LVEF.