| Literature DB >> 33841372 |
Qingyuan Yi1, Jiaxin Liu1, Yufeng Zhang1, Hanzhen Qiao2, Fang Chen1,3, Shihai Zhang1,3, Wutai Guan1,3.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of dietary anethole supplementation on the growth performance, intestinal barrier function, inflammatory response, and intestinal microbiota of piglets challenged withEntities:
Keywords: Escherichia coli K88; anethole; antibiotics; microbiota; piglet
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841372 PMCID: PMC8027122 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.647242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Effects of anethole on growth performance of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.
| Items | Treatments | SEM | ||||
| CON | ETEC | ATB | AN | |||
| Initial BW (kg) | 7.17 | 7.13 | 7.32 | 7.25 | 0.16 | 0.977 |
| Final BW (kg) | 13.78 | 12.69 | 13.60 | 13.51 | 0.41 | 0.795 |
| Pre-challenge (0–12 days) | ||||||
| ADFI (g) | 357 | 358 | 355 | 371 | 18 | 0.990 |
| ADG (g) | 275 | 272 | 280 | 285 | 14 | 0.989 |
| F/G | 1.33 | 1.30 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 0.04 | 0.995 |
| Post-challenge (13–19 days) | ||||||
| ADFI (g) | 623 | 559 | 623 | 608 | 27 | 0.832 |
| ADG (g) | 445 | 307 | 406 | 394 | 22 | 0.136 |
| F/G | 1.47 | 1.87 | 1.52 | 1.55 | 0.06 | 0.050 |
FIGURE 1Effects of anethole on intestinal morphology of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. (A) HE staining of intestine (B) Villi height, crypt depth and VCR of intestine. The data in each group is expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 9). Different letters mean statistically significant difference among the groups (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Effects of anethole on (A–B) intestinal secretory and (C–F) barrier function of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. For PCR assays, n = 8, GAPDH as reference gene; For western blot, n = 3, β-actin as reference protein; The data in each group is expressed as the mean ± SE. Different letters mean statistically significant difference among the groups (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Effects of anethole on concentration of relative mRNA expression of genes related to inflammation (A) jejunum, (B) ileum, (C) MLN, and (D) plasma cytokine and of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88. ELISA for plasma, n = 9; For PCR assays, n = 8, GAPDH as reference gene; The data in each group is expressed as the mean ± SE. Different letters mean statistically significant difference among the groups (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Effects of anethole on alpha diversity and beta diversity of fecal microbiota of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 (n = 5). (A–E) Alpha Diversity index: ACE, Chao1, Observed_species, Shannon, Simpson. (F) Principal Coordinates Analysis based weighted Unifrac. (G) NMDS Plot Analysis based weighted Unifrac.
FIGURE 5Effect of anethole on microbial composition of fecal microbiota of piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 (n = 5). (A) Relative abundance in phyla. (B) Top eight in phyla. (C) Relative abundance in genus. (D) Top 10 in genus.