| Literature DB >> 33841330 |
Baofeng Li1,2, Renkai Wang2, Xianyin Huang3, Yongliang Ou2, Zhenyu Jia2, Shanghui Lin2, Ying Zhang2, Hong Xia2, Bei Chen1.
Abstract
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been identified to accelerate bone formation. However, detailed mechanism has not been fully explained. In this study, we found that ESWT promoted osteoblast formation in vitro. Local ESW treatment of femur increased bone formation in vivo. Furthermore, changing the density or frequency of energy, there was no statistical difference in osteogenic differentiation. Therapeutically, local ESW therapy relieved bone loss and increased the number of bone trabecular in a rabbit osteoporosis model and promoted endogenous levels of SMAD2 protein expression. Thus, ESWT may be a potential therapy by promoting osteoblast maturation through TGF-β/SMAD2 pathway.Entities:
Keywords: SMAD2; extracorporeal shock wave; osteoblast; osteogenic differentiation; osteoporosis; osteoporosis model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841330 PMCID: PMC8027252 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.627718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1ESW therapy promoted osteoblast differentiation in vitro. (A) The ALP staining of BMSCs cultured in DMEM treated with N.C. or ESW, and quantitative analysis, Scale bar: 100 μm (B); (C) The Alizarin Red S staining of BMSCs cultured in DMEM treated with N.C. or ESW, and quantitative analysis, Scale bar: 100 μm (D); (E) The mRNA expression of ALP, OCN, OPG, and RUNX2 of BMSCs cultured in a-MEM treated with N.C. or ESW after 24 h. Data are reported as the mean ± SD. **p < 0.01.
Figure 2ESW treatment increased bone formation in vivo. (A) Representative micro-CT images in femur from rabbits treated with ESW or Con. Scale bar: 500 μm. (B) Quantitative micro-CT analysis of femur from rabbits treated with ESW or Con. (C) Representative images of calcein (Green) and tetracycline (yellow) labeling of trabecular bone from rabbits treated with ESW or Con. Scale bar: 500 μm. (D) the mineral apposition rate (MAR) and (E) the quantification of the BFR per bone surface (BFR/BS) of the femur from rabbits treated with ESW or Con. (n = 7, per group). Data are reported as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Different density or frequency of energy had little effects on osteogenesis. (A) Relative survival rate of BMSCs treated with ESW at different impulses. (B) Relative survival rate of BMSCs treated with ESW at different density of energy. (C) Representative images of ALP staining in BMSCs treated with ESW at different density of energy and quantitative analysis (D) Scale bar: 100 μm. Data are reported as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05.
Figure 4Administration of ESW can be a potential therapy of osteoporosis. (A) Representative images of Ponceau Staining in Rabbit femurs. Scale bars =500 μm. (B) Representative micro-CT images in femur from rabbits. Scale bars =500 μm. (C) Quantitative micro-CT analysis of femur from rabbits. Data are reported as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05.