| Literature DB >> 33841323 |
Xingchen Li1, Yuansheng Duan1, Dandan Liu1, Hongwei Liu2, Mengqian Zhou1, Kai Yue1, Yanjie Shuai1, Yu Wang1, Chenyan Ji1, Chao Jing1, Yansheng Wu1, Xudong Wang1.
Abstract
The Delphian lymph node (DLN), also known as the prelaryngeal node, is one component of the central lymph node. The DLN has been well studied in laryngeal cancer, although its significance in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 936 patients with PTC who underwent thyroidectomy by a single surgeon in Tianjin Cancer Hospital from 2017 to 2019. Moreover, 250 PTC patients who underwent thyroidectomy by another surgeon in Tianjin Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to April 2019 were used as a validation cohort. Among the 936 patients with PTC, 581 patients (62.1%) had DLNs, of which 177 samples with metastasis (177/581, 30.5%) were verified. DLN metastasis was significantly correlated with sex, age, tumor size, bilateral cancer, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension, lymphovascular invasion and central and lateral neck lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that independent risk factors for DLN metastasis included age, gender, tumor size, extrathyroid extension, lymphovascular invasion and central lymph node metastasis, which determined the nomogram. In particular, tumor size was proven to be one of the most predominant single predictors. The diagnostic model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% confidence interval, 0.804-0.854). The internal and external validations of the nomogram were 0.819 and 0.745, respectively. Our results demonstrate that DLN metastasis appears to be a critical parameter for predicting metastatic disease of the central compartments. Furthermore, this study provides a precise criterion for assessing DLN metastasis and has great clinical significance for treating PTC.Entities:
Keywords: Delphian lymph node; diagnostic model; nomogram; papillary thyroid cancer; risk factor
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33841323 PMCID: PMC8027498 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.591015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1The Delphian lymph node (DLN).
Rates of Delphian lymph node (DLN) detection and metastasis.
| Variables | N/total (%)* |
|---|---|
| DLN detection | 581/936 (62.07%) |
| DLN metastasis | 177/581 (30.46%) |
| Central neck node metastasis | 556/936 (59.40%) |
| Mean no. of DLNs (range) | 2.1 (1–10) |
| Mean no. of DLN metastases (range) | 1.6 (1–9) |
*Unless otherwise indicated.
Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between the patients with and without DLN metastasis.
| Variable | No. of DLN-positive patients (%) | No. of DLN-negative patients (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | <0.001 | ||
| Male | 83 (46.89) | 75 (18.56) | |
| Female | 94 (53.11) | 329 (81.44) | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 38.27 ± 11.997 | 43.86 ± 10.752 | <0.001* |
| Thyroiditis | 0.636 | ||
| Yes | 44 (24.85) | 108 (26.73) | |
| No | 133 (75.15) | 296 (73.27) | |
| Tumor size (mean ± SD) | 13.79 ± 8.8659 | 9.38 ± 4.3466 | <0.001 |
| Bilateral | |||
| No | 88 (49.71) | 265 (65.59) | <0.001 |
| Yes | 89 (50.29) | 139 (34.41) | |
| Multifocality | 82 (46.32) | 124 (30.69) | <0.001 |
| Extrathyroid extension | 154 (87.01) | 296 (73.27) | <0.001 |
| Lymphovascular invasion | 19 (10.73) | 6 (1.49) | <0.001 |
| Location of tumor | |||
| Solitary tumor | 82 (46.33) | 229 (56.68) | 0.208# |
| Upper | 16 | 47 | |
| Middle-upper | 11 | 42 | |
| Middle | 18 | 28 | |
| Middle-lower | 22 | 56 | |
| Lower | 15 | 56 | |
| Multifocal tumor | 95 (53.67) | 175 (43.32) | 0.109& |
| In one lobes | 35 | 48 | |
| In both lobes | 60 | 127 | |
| Central neck node metastases | <0.001 | ||
| Present | 161 (90.96) | 212 (53.12) | |
| Absent | 16 (9.04) | 187 (46.88) | |
| Lateral neck node metastases | 0.022 | ||
| Present | 103 (97.17) | 72 (88.89) | |
| Absent | 3 (2.83) | 9 (11.11) |
Data are no. of patients (%) unless otherwise indicated.
*t test for tumor location analysis; #for solitary tumors, upper vs. upper-middle vs. middle vs. middle-lower vs. lower; &for multifocal tumor, both lobes vs. single lobe.
Figure 2Multivariate logistic regression analysis of DLN metastasis.
Ability of Delphian node metastasis to predict central and lateral lymph node metastasis.
| Lymph node metastasis types | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | LR+ | LR− |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central | 43 | 92 | 91 | 47 | 5.38 | 0.62 |
| Lateral | 59 | 75 | 97 | 11 | 2.36 | 0.55 |
PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value;
LR+, positive likelihood radio; LR−, negative likelihood radio.
Figure 3The AUC of the ROC curve of the proposed methods for the diagnosis of DLN metastasis.
Figure 4An external cohort verification of the prediction model for DLN metastasis.
Figure 5Calibration plots of recalibrated prognostic models to predict risk of DLN metastasis. In the case of perfect calibration, all the groups of predicted probabilities fit close to the blue diagonal line, corresponding to an intercept of 0 and a slope of 1 for the calibration plot. The vertical lines in grouped observations represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 6Risk factor-based nomogram for predicting DLN metastasis. Predictor points (“Points” scale; top) correspond to each variable.