Literature DB >> 3384107

Quantification and classification of human sperm morphology by computer-assisted image analysis.

J F Moruzzi1, A J Wyrobek, B H Mayall, B L Gledhill.   

Abstract

A quantitative, semi-automated method for classifying human sperm based on objective measurements of head shapes and sizes has been developed. Air-dried smears of semen from eight healthy men were stained with the Feulgen reaction and 283 sperm were selected as prototypic examples of the 10 morphology classes used in our classification system. Sperm heads were imaged through a microscope (NA = 1.3), sampled at 0.125-micron intervals, and measured on an image analysis system. Measurements included stain content, length, width, perimeter, area, and arithmetically derived combinations. Additionally, each sperm image was optically sectioned at right angles to its major axis to give a measure of lengthwise heterogeneity of shape. Linear stepwise discriminant analysis was used to identify the more powerful parameters and to create a model employing eight parameters. The jackknifed classification procedure distinguished normal from abnormal sperm with 95% accuracy and correctly assigned 86% of the sperm to one of 10 shape classes. Most of the misclassification errors occurred among closely related classes. The results demonstrate the ability of automated image analysis to classify individual sperm into clinically familiar shape categories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3384107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  11 in total

1.  Entrenched misinformation about X and Y sperm.

Authors:  Valerie J Grant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-15

2.  Assessing human sperm morphology: top models, underdogs or biometrics?

Authors:  Jacques Auger
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  CASA derived human sperm abnormalities: correlation with chromatin packing and DNA fragmentation.

Authors:  T Sivanarayana; Ch Ravi Krishna; G Jaya Prakash; K Murali Krishna; K Madan; B Sireesha Rani; G Sudhakar; G A Rama Raju
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.

Authors:  J Lammers; C Splingart; P Barrière; M Jean; T Fréour
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Sperm DNA fragmentation assay by sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD): correlation between DNA fragmentation and outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  T Sivanarayana; Ch Ravi Krishna; G Jaya Prakash; K M Krishna; K Madan; G Sudhakar; G A Rama Raju
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-01

6.  Semen evaluation: methodological advancements in sperm quality-specific fertility assessment - A review.

Authors:  Bereket Molla Tanga; Ahmad Yar Qamar; Sanan Raza; Seonggyu Bang; Xun Fang; Kiyoung Yoon; Jongki Cho
Journal:  Anim Biosci       Date:  2021-04-23

7.  Geometric morphometrics of rodent sperm head shape.

Authors:  María Varea Sánchez; Markus Bastir; Eduardo R S Roldan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Foreword to Sperm morphometrics today and tomorrow special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology.

Authors:  Carles Soler; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  SpermQ⁻A Simple Analysis Software to Comprehensively Study Flagellar Beating and Sperm Steering.

Authors:  Jan N Hansen; Sebastian Rassmann; Jan F Jikeli; Dagmar Wachten
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men.

Authors:  Jesús L Yániz; Sandra Vicente-Fiel; Carles Soler; Pilar Recreo; Teresa Carretero; Araceli Bono; José M Berné; Pilar Santolaria
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.