Mara A G Hollander1, Evan S Cole2, Lindsay M Sabik2, Jeremy M Kahn3, Chung-Chou H Chang4, Marian P Jarlenski2, Julie M Donohue2. 1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: mholla23@jhu.edu. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: More than 17 million people have gained health insurance coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Few studies have examined heterogeneity within the Medicaid expansion population. We do so based on time-varying patterns of emergency department (ED) and ambulatory care use, and characterize diagnoses associated with ED and ambulatory care visits to evaluate whether certain diagnoses predominate in individual trajectories. METHOD: We used group-based multitrajectory modeling to jointly estimate trajectories of ambulatory care and ED utilization in the first 12 months of enrollment among Pennsylvania Medicaid expansion enrollees from 2015 to 2017. RESULTS: Among 601,877 expansion enrollees, we identified 6 distinct groups based on joint trajectories of ED and ambulatory care use. Mean ED use varied across groups from 3.4 to 48.7 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and between 2.8 and 44.0 visits per 100 enrollees in month 12. Mean ambulatory visit rates varied from 0.0 to 179 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and from 0.0 to 274 visits in month 12. Rates of ED visits did not change over time, but rates of ambulatory care visits increased by at least 50% among 4 groups during the study period. Groups varied on chronic condition diagnoses, including mental health and substance use disorders, as well as diagnoses associated with ambulatory care visits. CONCLUSION: We found substantial variation in rates of ED and ambulatory care use across empirically defined subgroups of Medicaid expansion enrollees. We also identified heterogeneity among the diagnoses associated with these visits. This data-driven approach may be used to target resources to encourage efficient use of ED services and support engagement with ambulatory care clinicians.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: More than 17 million people have gained health insurance coverage through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion. Few studies have examined heterogeneity within the Medicaid expansion population. We do so based on time-varying patterns of emergency department (ED) and ambulatory care use, and characterize diagnoses associated with ED and ambulatory care visits to evaluate whether certain diagnoses predominate in individual trajectories. METHOD: We used group-based multitrajectory modeling to jointly estimate trajectories of ambulatory care and ED utilization in the first 12 months of enrollment among Pennsylvania Medicaid expansion enrollees from 2015 to 2017. RESULTS: Among 601,877 expansion enrollees, we identified 6 distinct groups based on joint trajectories of ED and ambulatory care use. Mean ED use varied across groups from 3.4 to 48.7 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and between 2.8 and 44.0 visits per 100 enrollees in month 12. Mean ambulatory visit rates varied from 0.0 to 179 visits per 100 enrollees in the first month and from 0.0 to 274 visits in month 12. Rates of ED visits did not change over time, but rates of ambulatory care visits increased by at least 50% among 4 groups during the study period. Groups varied on chronic condition diagnoses, including mental health and substance use disorders, as well as diagnoses associated with ambulatory care visits. CONCLUSION: We found substantial variation in rates of ED and ambulatory care use across empirically defined subgroups of Medicaid expansion enrollees. We also identified heterogeneity among the diagnoses associated with these visits. This data-driven approach may be used to target resources to encourage efficient use of ED services and support engagement with ambulatory care clinicians.
Authors: Eili Y Klein; Scott Levin; Matthew F Toerper; Michael D Makowsky; Tim Xu; Gai Cole; Gabor D Kelen Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Brenda Reiss-Brennan; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Carter Dredge; Pascal Briot; Kyle Grazier; Adam Wilcox; Lucy Savitz; Brent James Journal: JAMA Date: 2016 Aug 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Walid F Gellad; Haiden A Huskamp; Niteesh K Choudhry; Chung-Chou H Chang; Ruoxin Zhang; Bobby L Jones; Hasan Guclu; Seth Richards-Shubik; Julie M Donohue Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic; Julie M Donohue; Bobby L Jones; Subashan Perera; Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe; Zachary A Marcum; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 5.128