Literature DB >> 33840428

Prevalence of Immature Survival Data for Anti-Cancer Drugs Presented to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and Impact on Decision Making.

Ting-An Tai1, Nicholas R Latimer2, Ágnes Benedict3, Zsofia Kiss4, Andreas Nikolaou4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This research aims to explore how often the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) uses immature overall survival data to inform reimbursement decisions on cancer treatments, and the implications of this for resource allocation decisions.
METHODS: NICE cancer technology appraisals published between 2015 and 2017 were reviewed to determine the prevalence of using immature survival data. A case study was used to demonstrate the potential impact of basing decisions on immature data. The economic model submitted by the company was reconstructed and was populated first using survival data available at the time of the appraisal, and then using data from an updated data cut published after the appraisal concluded. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) obtained using the different data cuts were compared. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was undertaken and expected value of perfect information estimated.
RESULTS: Forty-one percent of NICE cancer technology appraisals used immature data to inform reimbursement decisions. In the case study, NICE gave a positive recommendation for a limited patient subgroup, with ICERs too high in the complete patient population. ICERs were dramatically lower when the final data cut was used, irrespective of the parametric model used to model survival. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value of perfect information may not have fully characterized uncertainty, because as they did not account for structural uncertainty.
CONCLUSION: Analyses of cancer treatments using immature survival data may result in incorrect estimates of survival benefit and cost-effectiveness, potentially leading to inappropriate funding decisions. This research highlights the importance of revisiting past decisions when updated data cuts become available.
Copyright © 2020 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-utility analysis; health technology assessment; immature survival data; oncology; survival analysis; survival extrapolation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33840428     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  4 in total

1.  Out of Date or Best Before? A Commentary on the Relevance of Economic Evaluations Over Time.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Becky Pennington; Ash Bullement; Stuart Wright; Jamie Elvidge
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Cost-Effectiveness of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Hao Wang; Manman Yi; Zhou Han; Li Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Optimal Indicator of Death for Using Real-World Cancer Patients' Data From the Healthcare System.

Authors:  Suk-Chan Jang; Sun-Hong Kwon; Serim Min; Ae-Ryeo Jo; Eui-Kyung Lee; Jin Hyun Nam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Overall Survival Benefits of Cancer Drugs Approved in China From 2005 to 2020.

Authors:  Yichen Zhang; Huseyin Naci; Anita K Wagner; Ziyue Xu; Yu Yang; Jun Zhu; Jiafu Ji; Luwen Shi; Xiaodong Guan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.