| Literature DB >> 33840358 |
Xinghai Zhang1,2, Yuanguo Li1,2, Song Jin2,3, Yiming Zhang2,3, Leiyun Sun2, Xinyu Hu2, Menglin Zhao2, Fangxu Li2,3, Tiecheng Wang2,4, Weiyang Sun2,4, Na Feng2,4, Hongmei Wang3, Hongbin He3, Yongkun Zhao2,4, Songtao Yang2,4, Xianzhu Xia1,2,4, Yuwei Gao2,4.
Abstract
Influenza H3N8 viruses have been recovered frequently from wild bird species, including Anseriformes (primarily from migratory ducks) and Charadriiformes (primarily from shorebirds). However, little attention has been given to the transmission ability of H3N8 avian influenza viruses among mammals. Here, we study the potential human health threat and the molecular basis of mammalian transmissibility of H3N8 avian influenza viruses isolated from wild bird reservoirs. We classified eight H3N8 viruses into seven different genotypes based on genomic diversity. Six of eight H3N8 viruses isolated naturally from wild birds have acquired the ability to bind to the human-type receptor. However, the affinity for α-2,6-linked SAs was lower than that for α-2,3-linked SAs. Experiments on guinea pigs demonstrated that three viruses transmitted efficiently to direct-contact guinea pigs without prior adaptation. Notably, one virus transmitted efficiently via respiratory droplets in guinea pigs but not in ferrets. We further found that the PB1 S524G mutation conferred T222 virus airborne transmissibility between ferrets. We also determined that the 524G mutant increased viral pathogenicity slightly in mice compared with the WT (wild type). Based on these results, we elucidated the potential human health threat and molecular basis of mammalian transmissibility of H3N8 influenza viruses. We emphasized the need for continued surveillance of the H3N8 influenza viruses circulating in birds.Entities:
Keywords: H3N8 influenza virus; Wild birds; mammals; molecular basis; transmission
Year: 2021 PMID: 33840358 PMCID: PMC8183522 DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1912644
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Microbes Infect ISSN: 2222-1751 Impact factor: 7.163
Figure 1.Phylogenetic analyses of wild bird-origin H3N8 influenza A viruses. The phylogenetic tree for each gene segment was inferred using a maximum likelihood method using a Gamma model of rate heterogeneity and a GTR substitution model. The taxa name of viruses sequenced in this study is shown with red in the phylogenetic tree.
Figure 2.Glycan array analysis of wild bird-origin H3N8 influenza viruses: (A) SH131, (B) T75, (C) SH90-N, (D) T51, (E) CZ355, and (F) T222. The frames I to III represent different glycans categories: I, alpha-2,3-linked sialic acid glycans; II, alpha-2,6-linked sialic acid glycans; III, alpha-2,3- and alpha-2,6-linked sialic acid glycans. Glycans on the microarray are grouped according to SA linkage and glycans modification: Neu5Gcα2-3Gal (blue), Neu5Acα2-3Gal (Navy blue), Neu5Gcα2-6Gal (Red), Neu5Acα2-6Gal (Dark Brown), fucosylated Neu5Acα2-3Gal (Purple), fucosylated Neu5Gcα2-3Gal (Orange), fucosylated Neu5Acα2-6Gal (Black), fucosylated Neu5Gcα2-6Gal (Brown), and 2,3 & 2,6-linked sialic acid (Green). Vertical bars denote the fluorescence binding signal intensity on the array. The structures of each numbered glycan are found in Figure S5.
Figure 3.Transmission of H3N8 avian influenza viruses in guinea pigs. Viral titers in the nasal washes of guinea pigs after infection with avian H3N8 influenza A viruses. Groups of three guinea pigs were inoculated with 106 EID50 of test virus in a 300-μl volume (150-μl per nostril). 24 h later, three naive guinea pigs were introduced into the same cage to test for direct-contact transmission, and another three naive guinea pigs were put into the adjacent cage for respiratory droplet transmission studies. Nasal washes were collected at the indicated times for detection of virus shedding. Each color bar represents the virus titers from an individual animal. Dashed lines represent the limit of detection.
Mutations of H3N8 viruses isolated in the nasal washes of guinea pig in the transmission study.
| The nasal washes of guinea pig | Amino acid change(s) detected at the indicated time | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 2 p.i. | Day 4 p.i. | Day 6 p.i. | Day 3 p.e. | Day 5 p.e. | Day 7 p.e. | Day 9 p.e. | |
| T222-I1 | * | * | PB1 S524G | ||||
| T222-I2 | * | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | ||||
| T222-I3 | * | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | ||||
| T222-C1 | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | |||
| T222-C2 | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | / | |||
| T222-C3 | / | / | / | PB1 S524G | |||
| T222-E1 | / | / | / | / | |||
| T222-E2 | / | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | |||
| T222-E3 | / | / | PB1 S524G | PB1 S524G | |||
* No mutation detected.
/ No virus isolated.
Figure 4.Airborne transmission of T222 (A) and T222-G1 (B) in ferrets. Ferrets (n = 3 per group) were inoculated with 106 EID50 of test virus in a 500-μl volume (250 μl per nostril). Twenty-four hours later, three naive ferrets were put into the adjacent cage for respiratory droplet transmission studies. After infection with the test virus, the nasal washes of ferrets were collected at the indicated d.p.i. for viral titers (A and B). HI antibody titers of the animals are shown (C and D). Each column represents a single ferret on the indicated d.p.i. Dashed lines represent the limit of detection.
Figure 5.Airborne transmission of rT222 and rT222-S524G rescued by reverse genetics in ferrets. The vertical axis represents titers of influenza viruses recovered from nasal washes of the virus-inoculated and exposed ferrets (A and B). HI antibody titers of the animals are shown C. Each column represents individual animals. Dashed lines represent the limit of detection. Average virus titers in the nasal wash of ferret inoculated with the virus at the indicated time are shown D.
Figure 6.The replication of rT222 and mutant rT222-S524G in vitro and in vivo. (A) Polymerase activity was measured in 293T cells at 37°C. Cells not expressing PB1 served as control. RNP polymerase activities of wild-type and mutant viruses in 293T cells, transfected with polymerase plasmids (PB1/PB1-S524G, PA, NP, and PB2), were determined by minigenome replication assays. (B) Replication kinetics of rT222-wild and rT222-S425G in MDCK cells. Cells were infected with viruses at MOI of 0.01. A significant difference was found between infectivity titers for rT222-wild and rT222-S425G in MDCK cells in 12 and 24 hours post-infection. (C) Bodyweight change differences between mice inoculated with rT222-wild and rT222-S425G virus. (D) The IFN-β expression in the lung of inoculated mice with rT222 and rT222-S524G. The mean virus titers in the lung, trachea, and nasal turbinate tissues of infected mice at the indicated time are shown in (E), (F), and (G), respectively. The mean virus titers in the respiratory organs in guinea pigs and ferrets at 24 h post-infection are shown in (H) and (I), respectively.
Figure 7.Histological lesions caused by H3N8 viruses in the lungs of ferrets. Ferrets were euthanized on 4 d.p.i. with 106 EID50 of test virus, and the lungs were collected for pathological study. The lungs of rT222 virus-inoculated animals showed only mild histopathological changes (H&E staining) (A-D), whereas the lungs of rT222-S524G(E-H), virus-inoculated ferrets showed severe pathological lesions (H&E staining). Images were taken at a 40×magnification.