Literature DB >> 33839953

Male mice and cows perceive human emotional chemosignals: a preliminary study.

Alexandra Destrez1,2, Morgane Costes-Thiré3, Anne-Sophie Viart3, Floriane Prost3, Bruno Patris4, Benoist Schaal4.   

Abstract

Olfactory cues of individuals of the same species or from different species may induce changes in behaviors and physiological reactions in mammals. However, there are few studies on the influence of human odor on animal behavior and welfare, especially those of rodents and farm animals. The present study aimed to investigate whether the odor of a stressed human (in sweat) would modify the behavior of mice and cows. We hypothesized that laboratory and farm animals can perceive human emotions though olfactory cues and that human emotional chemosignals can modify their behavioral reactions and welfare. Two odors of human axillary sweat were collected from engineering students (n = 25, 14 females and 11 males; 21.1 ± 0.7 years old, range: 19-23 years old): a "stress" odor collected after an exam and a "non-stress" odor collected after a standard class. Two experiments were then conducted to test the discrimination of these two odors by male mice (n = 20) under standard conditions and by cows (n = 10) under farm conditions. During the experiments, the behavioral responses of the animals to both odors (through a dispenser for the mice and a bucket for the cows) were observed. The mice produced significantly (p = 0.004) more fecal pellets with the stress odor dispenser than with the non-stress-odor dispenser. The cows spent significantly (p = 0.04) more time smelling the non-stress-odor bucket than control. For both species, the other behaviors observed did not differ significantly between the odors. Mice and cows seemed to perceive and react to stressful human chemosignals. Mice showed physiological reactions that indicated stress in response to the stress odor of humans, while cows showed preference reactions in response to the non-stress odor of humans. This preliminary study showed that laboratory and farm animals, such as male mice and cows, seemed to discriminate certain odors emitted by humans that were likely related to different emotions. Animals may recognize stressful human chemosignals, associate these signals with negative husbandry practices or human-animal relationships, and consequently modify their behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body odors; Cattle; Chemosignals; Human–animal relationship; Lab animals; Stress

Year:  2021        PMID: 33839953     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01511-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  13 in total

1.  Mirogabalin prevents repeated restraint stress-induced dysfunction in mice.

Authors:  Takashi Iwai; Akinori Kikuchi; Misa Oyama; Shun Watanabe; Mitsuo Tanabe
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Farmer welfare and animal welfare- Exploring the relationship between farmer's occupational well-being and stress, farm expansion and animal welfare.

Authors:  Bjørn Gunnar Hansen; Olav Østerås
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.670

3.  Odor Perception by Dogs: Evaluating Two Training Approaches for Odor Learning of Sniffer Dogs.

Authors:  Carola Fischer-Tenhagen; Dorothea Johnen; Wolfgang Heuwieser; Roland Becker; Kristin Schallschmidt; Irene Nehls
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Demonstration of estrus-related odors in cow urine by operant conditioning of rats.

Authors:  J Ladewig; B L Hart
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 4.285

5.  The valence of the long-lasting emotional experiences with various handlers modulates discrimination and generalization of individual humans in sheep.

Authors:  A Destrez; M Coulon; V Deiss; E Delval; A Boissy; X Boivin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Role of tachykinin NK(1) and NK(2) receptors in colonic sensitivity and stress-induced defecation in gerbils.

Authors:  Dorota Kakol-Palm; Mikael Brusberg; Elin Sand; Håkan Larsson; Vicente Martinez; Anders Johansson; Bengt von Mentzer; Ingrid Påhlman; Erik Lindström
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.432

7.  Optimising reliability of mouse performance in behavioural testing: the major role of non-aversive handling.

Authors:  Kelly Gouveia; Jane L Hurst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sex differences in the behavioral responses of dogs exposed to human chemosignals of fear and happiness.

Authors:  Biagio D'Aniello; Barbara Fierro; Anna Scandurra; Claudia Pinelli; Massimo Aria; Gün R Semin
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans.

Authors:  Lilianne R Mujica-Parodi; Helmut H Strey; Blaise Frederick; Robert Savoy; David Cox; Yevgeny Botanov; Denis Tolkunov; Denis Rubin; Jochen Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A lifetime of neurogenesis in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Jessica H Brann; Stuart J Firestein
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cognition and the human-animal relationship: a review of the sociocognitive skills of domestic mammals toward humans.

Authors:  Plotine Jardat; Léa Lansade
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Dogs can discriminate between human baseline and psychological stress condition odours.

Authors:  Clara Wilson; Kerry Campbell; Zachary Petzel; Catherine Reeve
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.