| Literature DB >> 33839905 |
Oana P Zaharia1,2, Yuliya Kupriyanova1,2, Yanislava Karusheva1,2, Daniel F Markgraf1,2, Konstantinos Kantartzis2,3, Andreas L Birkenfeld2,3, Michael Trenell4,5, Aarti Sahasranaman5, Chris Cheyette6, Theresa Kössler1,2,7, Kálmán Bódis1,2,7, Volker Burkart1,2, Jong-Hee Hwang1,2, Michael Roden1,2,7, Julia Szendroedi8,9,10, Dominik H Pesta1,2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent trials demonstrated remission of type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) following formula diet-induced weight loss. To improve the outreach for populations in need, many mobile health apps targeting weight loss have been developed with limited scientific evaluation of these apps. The present feasibility study investigated the effects of a novel approach incorporating a regular 'whole food-based' low-calorie diet combined with app-based digital education and behavioral change program on glucose metabolism and disease management.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes management; Digital education; Insulin sensitivity; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33839905 PMCID: PMC8437928 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-021-02521-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nutr ISSN: 1436-6207 Impact factor: 5.614
Fig. 1Recruitment flow diagram
Baseline and follow-up characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 24)
| Parameter | Baseline | Follow-up | Change (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56 ± 8 | 56 ± 8 | – | – |
| Sex (% female) | 58 | 58 | – | – |
| Body weight (kg) | 97.0 ± 13.9 | 87.7 ± 12.1 | − 10 | < 0.01 |
| BMI (kg.m−2) | 32.6 ± 4.6 | 29.4 ± 3.9 | − 10 | < 0.01 |
| Fat mass (%) | 30.9 ± 9.5 | 27.4 ± 10.2 | − 11 | < 0.01 |
| Fasting C-peptide (ng.ml−1) | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 2.5 ± 1.0 | − 24 | < 0.05 |
| Insulin AUC MMTT (a.u.) | 6969 ± 3899 | 4868 ± 2398 | − 30 | < 0.05 |
| Total cholesterol (mg.dl−1) | 185.9 ± 42.0 | 174.4 ± 40.6 | − 6 | 0.09 |
| LDL-cholesterol (mg.dl−1) | 116.9 ± 39.6 | 109.6 ± 40.4 | − 6 | 0.23 |
| HDL-cholesterol (mg.dl−1) | 48.2 ± 14.0 | 50.4 ± 11.7 | + 5 | 0.09 |
| Fasting triglycerides (mg.dl−1) | 197.0 ± 127.8 | 122.7 ± 60.8 | − 38 | < 0.01 |
| AST (U.l−1) | 25.5 ± 11.4 | 23.3 ± 9.5 | − 9 | 0.21 |
| GGT (U.l−1) | 53.3 ± 72.2 | 36.5 ± 47.1 | − 32 | < 0.05 |
| hsCRP (mg.dl−1) | 0.4 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 1.0 | + 50 | 0.33 |
| TSH (µIE.ml−1) | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | − 32 | < 0.05 |
| CAP (dB.m−1) | 326 ± 64 | 263 ± 56 | − 19 | < 0.01 |
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation or percentages, paired samples t-test was used for pre-post comparison
AST aspartate aminotransferase, AUC area under the curve, BMI body mass index, CAP controlled attenuation parameter, GGT gamma glutamyl-transferase, HDL high-density lipoproteins, hsCRP high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, LDL low-density lipoproteins, MMTT mixed-meal tolerance test, TSH thyroid-stimulating hormone
Significant differences as determined by paired samples t-test
Fig. 2Metabolic parameters before and after the intervention. Glycemic control (a, b) and insulin sensitivity (c), cardiovascular parameters: blood pressure (d, e) and resting heart rate (f) and liver parameters: HCL (g), ALT (h) and stiffness (i). Black bars represent baseline data while post-intervention data are shown as grey bars. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Significant differences as determined by paired samples t-test for pre-post comparison. ALT alanine aminotransferase, BP blood pressure, HbA1c glycated hemoglobin, OGIS oral glucose insulin sensitivity index
Fig. 3Metabolic response to mixed-meal tolerance test before and after intervention. Metabolic parameters during the mixed-meal test before and after the intervention: glycemia (a), insulin secretion (b), free fatty acids (c) and triglycerides (d). Black dots and respective error bars represent baseline data while post-intervention data are shown as white dots and respective error bars. *p < 0.05. Significant differences as determined by paired samples t-test for pre-post comparison