Literature DB >> 33839835

An Update on the COGiTATE Phase II Study: Feasibility and Safety of Targeting an Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure as a Patient-Tailored Therapy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Jeanette Tas1, Erta Beqiri2,3, C R van Kaam4, Ari Ercole5, Gert Bellen6, D Bruyninckx6, Manuel Cabeleira2, Marek Czosnyka2, Bart Depreitere6, Joseph Donnelly2, Marta Fedriga2,7, Peter J Hutchinson8, D Menon5, Geert Meyfroidt9, Annalisa Liberti10, J G Outtrim5, C Robba11, C W E Hoedemaekers4, Peter Smielewski2, Marcel J Aries10.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of cerebral autoregulation (CA) in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) can provide an individual 'optimal' cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) target (CPPopt) at which CA is best preserved. This potentially offers an individualized precision medicine approach. Retrospective data suggest that deviation of CPP from CPPopt is associated with poor outcomes. We are prospectively assessing the feasibility and safety of this approach in the COGiTATE [CPPopt Guided Therapy: Assessment of Target Effectiveness] study. Its primary objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of individualizing CPP at CPPopt in TBI patients. The secondary objectives are to investigate the safety and physiological effects of this strategy.
METHODS: The COGiTATE study has included patients in four European hospitals in Cambridge, Leuven, Nijmegen, and Maastricht (coordinating centre). Patients with severe TBI requiring intracranial pressure (ICP)-directed therapy are allocated into one of two groups. In the intervention group, CPPopt is calculated using a published (modified) algorithm. In the control group, the CPP target recommended in the Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines (CPP 60-70 mmHg) is used.
RESULTS: Patient recruitment started in February 2018 and will continue until 60 patients have been studied. Fifty-one patients (85% of the intended total) have been recruited in October 2019. The first results are expected early 2021.
CONCLUSION: This prospective evaluation of the feasibility, safety and physiological implications of autoregulation-guided CPP management is providing evidence that will be useful in the design of a future phase III study in severe TBI patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COGiTATE; CPPopt; Cerebral autoregulation; Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure; PRx

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33839835     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Targeting Mean Arterial Pressure During Cardiopulmonary Bypass by Monitoring Cerebral Autoregulation on Postsurgical Delirium Among Older Patients: A Nested Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Charles H Brown; Karin J Neufeld; Jing Tian; Julia Probert; Andrew LaFlam; Laura Max; Daijiro Hori; Yohei Nomura; Kaushik Mandal; Ken Brady; Charles W Hogue; Ashish Shah; Kenton Zehr; Duke Cameron; John Conte; O Joseph Bienvenu; Rebecca Gottesman; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Michael Kraut
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  An algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: filling the gap between evidence and practice.

Authors:  Martin Smith; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Personalizing the Definition of Hypotension to Protect the Brain.

Authors:  Kenneth M Brady; Aaron Hudson; Ryan Hood; Bruno DeCaria; Choy Lewis; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury.

Authors:  Marcella Balestreri; Marek Czosnyka; Peter Hutchinson; Luzius A Steiner; Magda Hiler; Piotr Smielewski; John D Pickard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Feasibility of individualised severe traumatic brain injury management using an automated assessment of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: the COGiTATE phase II study protocol.

Authors:  Erta Beqiri; Peter Smielewski; Chiara Robba; Marek Czosnyka; Manuel Teixeira Cabeleira; Jeanette Tas; Joseph Donnelly; Joanne G Outtrim; Peter Hutchinson; David Menon; Geert Meyfroidt; Bart Depreitere; Marcel J Aries; Ari Ercole
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A management algorithm for patients with intracranial pressure monitoring: the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference (SIBICC).

Authors:  Gregory W J Hawryluk; Sergio Aguilera; Andras Buki; Eileen Bulger; Giuseppe Citerio; D Jamie Cooper; Ramon Diaz Arrastia; Michael Diringer; Anthony Figaji; Guoyi Gao; Romergryko Geocadin; Jamshid Ghajar; Odette Harris; Alan Hoffer; Peter Hutchinson; Mathew Joseph; Ryan Kitagawa; Geoffrey Manley; Stephan Mayer; David K Menon; Geert Meyfroidt; Daniel B Michael; Mauro Oddo; David Okonkwo; Mayur Patel; Claudia Robertson; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Andres M Rubiano; Juan Sahuquillo; Franco Servadei; Lori Shutter; Deborah Stein; Nino Stocchetti; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Shelly Timmons; Eve Tsai; Jamie S Ullman; Paul Vespa; Walter Videtta; David W Wright; Christopher Zammit; Randall M Chesnut
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 17.440

  6 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Raman Spectroscopy as a Neuromonitoring Tool in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Andrew R Stevens; Clarissa A Stickland; Georgia Harris; Zubair Ahmed; Pola Goldberg Oppenheimer; Antonio Belli; David J Davies
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.600

2.  Effect of artifacts upon the pressure reactivity index.

Authors:  Martin Rozanek; Josef Skola; Lenka Horakova; Valeriia Trukhan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.