Changhong Ren1, Weihua Zhang1, Xiaotun Ren1, Jiuwei Li1, Changhong Ding1, Xiaohui Wang1, Haitao Ren2, Fang Fang3. 1. Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Department of Neurology, Beijing, China. 2. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Department of Neurology, Beijing, China. 3. Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Department of Neurology, Beijing, China. Electronic address: fangfang@bch.com.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical features and outcomes of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in infants and toddlers. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. Infants and toddlers who met the diagnostic criteria for anti-NMDAR encephalitis were recruited for the study. Data on clinical features, treatment, and long-term outcomes were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (age range: six to 34 months; median age: 23 months; female: 19) were enrolled in this study. Nineteen (46%) patients exhibited classical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, whereas 22 (54%) patients exhibited anti-NMDAR encephalitis after viral encephalitis. There was a high presentation of movement disorders (100%), developmental regression (90%), abnormal behaviors (90%). All patients were administered first-line therapy, with only 17% of them being administered second-line immunotherapy. Two patients succumbed to the disease, whereas none of them relapsed. At the long-term follow-up (more than one year), 20 of 35 (57%) exhibited satisfactory outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≤2). Compared with patients with classical anti-NMDAR encephalitis (n = 18), patients after viral encephalitis (n = 17) were more likely to have worse clinical outcomes. They exhibited a higher modified Rankin Scale/Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score and more frequent seizures. A predictor of poor outcome was presentation after viral encephalitis (odds ratio 35.7, 95% confidence interval 4.64 to 275.03, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis in infants and toddlers clinically presents with movement disorders, developmental regression, and abnormal behaviors. Interestingly, this group had a higher proportion of patients after viral encephalitis, which is regarded as the only risk factor for poor outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: We describe the clinical features and outcomes of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in infants and toddlers. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. Infants and toddlers who met the diagnostic criteria for anti-NMDAR encephalitis were recruited for the study. Data on clinical features, treatment, and long-term outcomes were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (age range: six to 34 months; median age: 23 months; female: 19) were enrolled in this study. Nineteen (46%) patients exhibited classical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, whereas 22 (54%) patients exhibited anti-NMDAR encephalitis after viral encephalitis. There was a high presentation of movement disorders (100%), developmental regression (90%), abnormal behaviors (90%). All patients were administered first-line therapy, with only 17% of them being administered second-line immunotherapy. Two patients succumbed to the disease, whereas none of them relapsed. At the long-term follow-up (more than one year), 20 of 35 (57%) exhibited satisfactory outcomes (modified Rankin Scale ≤2). Compared with patients with classical anti-NMDAR encephalitis (n = 18), patients after viral encephalitis (n = 17) were more likely to have worse clinical outcomes. They exhibited a higher modified Rankin Scale/Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score and more frequent seizures. A predictor of poor outcome was presentation after viral encephalitis (odds ratio 35.7, 95% confidence interval 4.64 to 275.03, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Anti-NMDAR encephalitis in infants and toddlers clinically presents with movement disorders, developmental regression, and abnormal behaviors. Interestingly, this group had a higher proportion of patients after viral encephalitis, which is regarded as the only risk factor for poor outcomes.