Marc A Benninga1, Sunny Z Hussain2, Manu R Sood3, Samuel Nurko4, Paul Hyman5, Robert A Clifford6, Molly O'Gorman7, Taryn Losch-Beridon8, Shadreck Mareya9, Peter Lichtlen10, Carlo Di Lorenzo11. 1. Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 2. Willis-Knighton Pediatric Gastroenterology and Research, Shreveport, Louisiana. 3. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 4. Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Gastroenterology Department, Children's Hospital, New Orleans, Louisiana. 6. Coastal Pediatric Associates, Charleston, South Carolina. 7. Primary Children's Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. 8. Clinical Development, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Rockville, Maryland. 9. Clinical Program Management, Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Rockville, Maryland. 10. Sucampo AG, Zug, Switzerland. 11. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: carlo.dilorenzo@nationwidechildrens.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a common problem in children that causes distress and presents treatment challenges to health care professionals. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (study 1) in patients with PFC (6-17 years of age) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone, followed by an open-label extension for those who completed the placebo-controlled phase (study 2). METHODS: Study 1 (NCT02042183) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study evaluating the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone 12 μg twice daily (BID) and 24 μg BID. Study 2 (NCT02138136) was a phase 3, long-term, open-label extension of study 1. In both studies, lubiprostone doses were based on patients' weight. Efficacy was assessed solely based on study 1, with a primary endpoint of overall spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) response (increase of ≥1 SBM/wk vs baseline and ≥3 SBMs/wk for ≥9 weeks, including 3 of the final 4 weeks). RESULTS: 606 patients were randomized to treatment (placebo: n = 202; lubiprostone: n = 404) in study 1. No statistically significant difference in overall SBM response rate was observed between the lubiprostone and placebo groups (18.5% vs 14.4%; P = .2245). Both the 12-μg BID and 24-μg BID doses of lubiprostone were well tolerated in the double-blind and extension phases, with a safety profile consistent with that seen in adult studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone did not demonstrate statistically significant effectiveness over placebo in children and adolescents with PFC but did demonstrate a safety profile similar to that in adults. (ClinicalTrials.gov: Number: NCT02042183; Number: NCT02138136).
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pediatric functional constipation (PFC) is a common problem in children that causes distress and presents treatment challenges to health care professionals. We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (study 1) in patients with PFC (6-17 years of age) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone, followed by an open-label extension for those who completed the placebo-controlled phase (study 2). METHODS: Study 1 (NCT02042183) was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study evaluating the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone 12 μg twice daily (BID) and 24 μg BID. Study 2 (NCT02138136) was a phase 3, long-term, open-label extension of study 1. In both studies, lubiprostone doses were based on patients' weight. Efficacy was assessed solely based on study 1, with a primary endpoint of overall spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) response (increase of ≥1 SBM/wk vs baseline and ≥3 SBMs/wk for ≥9 weeks, including 3 of the final 4 weeks). RESULTS: 606 patients were randomized to treatment (placebo: n = 202; lubiprostone: n = 404) in study 1. No statistically significant difference in overall SBM response rate was observed between the lubiprostone and placebo groups (18.5% vs 14.4%; P = .2245). Both the 12-μg BID and 24-μg BID doses of lubiprostone were well tolerated in the double-blind and extension phases, with a safety profile consistent with that seen in adult studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone did not demonstrate statistically significant effectiveness over placebo in children and adolescents with PFC but did demonstrate a safety profile similar to that in adults. (ClinicalTrials.gov: Number: NCT02042183; Number: NCT02138136).