| Literature DB >> 33837941 |
Abstract
Chile is currently rated among the performing countries towards the achievement of the global goals of reducing carbon emission. It is on recorded that Chile as a country has moved from highly insufficient to insufficient and still working towards conforming to recommend the region of 2°C in quest of controlling climate change through carbon emission reduction. From this development, it is essential to investigate on the country's strategies in achieving this success and equally make recommendation for other countries to adopt Chile's strategy as a blue print in controlling carbon emission. To effectively do this and achieve the objective of this study, I adopt nonlinear and asymmetric approaches to have a combined (positive and negative) view of the reactions of the selected variable towards determining the impact of each variable towards curbing emission in Chile. Also, a careful selection of variable which includes economic growth (GDP per capita-Y), institutional quality, foreign direct investment (FDI), fossil fuels, and renewable energy consumption was undertaken in this study. The focus was on the interaction of institutional quality and FDI towards ascertainment of environment performance. Chile's quarterly data of 1996Q1 to 2018Q4 was utilized, and the following findings were made: positive and negative shocks to the economic growth, institutional quality, and renewable energy impacted favorably and negatively on Chile's environment through reduction and promotion of emission, respectively. In contrast, positive and negative shocks to FDI and fossil fuels impact both negatively on the Chile's environment through increase in carbon emission. So institutional quality is vital in controlling the negative impact from FDI and fossil fuels.Entities:
Keywords: Chile; Economic growth; FDI; Institutional quality; Nonlinear study; Sustainable study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33837941 PMCID: PMC8035612 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-13805-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Summary of the selected variables with their measurements
| Variables | Short form | Measurements | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
| Economic growth | GDP (Y) | GDP per capita (constant 2010 US$) | 2018 updated World Development Indicator (WDI) |
| Institutional quality | I.Q | Rank of the six indicators (voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption) | Worldwide Governance Indicator (WGI) |
| Foreign direct investment | FDI | Foreign direct investment, net outflows (% of GDP) | 2018 updated World Development Indicator (WDI) |
| Carbon emission | CO2 | Million tonnes of carbon dioxide | 2019 British Petroleum (BP) Statistical Review of World Energy |
| Renewable energy consumption | R.E | Million tonnes oil equivalent | 2019 British Petroleum (BP) Statistical Review of World Energy |
| Non-renewable energy consumption | Fossil fuels (FF) | Million tonnes oil equivalent | 2019 British Petroleum (BP) Statistical Review of World Energy |
Source: Author’s compilation
Fig. 1Trends in GDP per capita, institutional quality, FDI, carbon emission, fossil fuels, and renewable energy consumption in Chile from 1996Q1 to 2018q4
Descriptive statistics
| CO2 | GDP(Y) | IQ | Fossil fuel | R. energy | FDI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 72.06506 | 11920.01 | 495.6476 | 25.03927 | 0.996039 | 3.380622 |
| Median | 74.34149 | 12227.21 | 499.6729 | 25.48706 | 0.612572 | 2.794579 |
| Maximum | 95.80449 | 15111.70 | 518.4195 | 31.34284 | 3.517400 | 8.028459 |
| Minimum | 47.64945 | 8427.822 | 463.3548 | 16.37165 | 0.262705 | 0.194500 |
| Std. Dev. | 15.45950 | 2182.778 | 14.06412 | 3.956083 | 0.891835 | 1.943206 |
| Skewness | 0.123907 | −0.021613 | −0.507611 | −0.168749 | 1.488826 | 0.677839 |
| Kurtosis | 1.416927 | 1.535331 | 2.218909 | 1.875767 | 4.185897 | 2.639614 |
| Jarque-Bera | 9.521260 | 7.962254 | 6.084561 | 5.109362 | 38.09481 | 7.297029 |
| Probability | 0.008560 | 0.018665 | 0.047726 | 0.077717 | 0.000000 | 0.026030 |
| Sum | 6413.790 | 1060881. | 44112.64 | 2228.495 | 88.64751 | 300.8754 |
| Sum Sq. Dev. | 21031.67 | 4.19E+08 | 17406.36 | 1377.252 | 69.99253 | 332.2923 |
| Observations | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 | 89 |
CO2 denotes carbon emission, GDP(Y), denotes economic growth, FDI denotes foreign direct investment, fossil fuels (FF) denotes non-renewable energy consumption, and RE denotes renewable energy consumption. Sources: Computed by author
Conventional (ADF, PP, and KPSS) unit root test
| Variables | Level | 1st Diff | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Intercept and trend | Intercept | Intercept and trend | Order | |
| LCO2 | −0.4615 | −3.2403* | −3.4636** | −3.4391* | MIXED |
| LGDP | −0.3998 | −3.1073 | −3.0890** | −3.0537 | I (1) |
| LIQ | −2.7466* | −2.8044 | −3.1158** | −3.1852* | MIXED |
| FDI | −1.5819 | −0.9997 | −1.00668 | −1.3905 | MIXED |
| LFF | −0.9280 | −4.4573*** | −3.6149*** | −3.5449** | MIXED |
| LRE | 1.0582 | −0.6868 | −2.4257 | −3.3049* | I (1) |
| LCO2 | −0.5988 | −1.9884 | −3.6604*** | −3.6317** | I (1) |
| LGDP | −0.6678 | −1.6629 | −3.3403** | −3.3107* | I (1) |
| LIQ | −1.4518 | −1.4624 | −3.2720** | −3.3358* | I (1) |
| FDI | −1.8259 | −1.3841 | −3.8258*** | −3.9331** | I (1) |
| LFF | −1.6026 | −3.2646* | −3.8064*** | −3.7510** | MIXED |
| LRE | 4.8410 | −1.1247 | −2.5412 | −3.6129** | I (1) |
| LCO2 | 1.1774*** | 0.1386* | 0.0648 | 0.0659 | I (1) |
| LGDP | 1.2058*** | 0.1082 | 0.1103 | 0.0959 | I (1) |
| LIQ | 0.2452 | 0.22297*** | 0.1313 | 0.0630 | I (1) |
| FDI | 0.4167* | 0.1332* | 0.1812 | 0.0814 | I (1) |
| LFF | 1.2067*** | 0.0741 | 0.1150 | 0.0495 | I (1) |
| LRE | 0.9757*** | 0.2814*** | 0.8319*** | 0.1071 | MIXED |
Null hypothesis is non-stationary for ADF and PP and stationary for KPSS
The signs depict (*) significant at the 10%; (**) significant at the 5%; (***) significant at the 1%, and (no) not significant
*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values
Zivot-Andrew break test
| Variables | Ziv-A | Prob | Lg | Break period | CV@ (1%) | CV@ (5%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LCO2 | −3.74868 | 0.3632 | 4 | 2003Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| LGDP | −4.07140 | 0.0018*** | 4 | 2009Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| LIQ | −4.87723 | 0.03958** | 4 | 2003Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| FDI | −5.3099 | 0.0010*** | 4 | 2010Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| LFF | −5.08214 | 0.0674* | 4 | 2010Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| LRE | −2.1459 | 0.00016*** | 4 | 2014Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| D LCO2 | −3.74868 | 0.3632 | 4 | 2003Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| DLGDP | −3.42126 | 0.4019 | 4 | 2003Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| DLIQ | −3.78407 | 0.37841 | 4 | 2000Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| DFDI | −5.4905 | 0.0104* | 4 | 2010Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| DFF | −3.5537 | 0.0616* | 4 | 2012Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
| DLRE | −4.8337 | 0.28315 | 4 | 2008Q2 | −5.57 | −5.08 |
The signs depict (*) significant at the 10%; (**) significant at the 5%; (***) significant at the 1%, and (no) not significant
*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values
Nonlinear ARDL long- and short-run results
| Long-run estimation | Short-run estimation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Coeff | Std Error | Variables | Coeff | Std Error | ||||
| −0.004 | 0.001 | −4.975 | 0.000 | −0.004 | 0.001 | −6.658 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.009 | 0.001 | 7.254 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 9.241 | 0.000 | ||
| −0.649 | 0.042 | −15.64 | 0.000 | −0.649 | 0.030 | −21.54 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.524 | 0.033 | 15.83 | 0.000 | 0.524 | 0.022 | 23.31 | 0.000 | ||
| 0.908 | 0.081 | 11.17 | 0.000 | 0.908 | 0.056 | 16.31 | 0.000 | ||
| −0.034 | 0.061 | −0.550 | 0.584 | −0.034 | 0.035 | −0.955 | 0.343 | ||
| 3.323 | 0.089 | 37.27 | 0.000 | 3.323 | 0.062 | 53.91 | 0.000 | ||
| 4.193 | 0.313 | 13.37 | 0.000 | 4.193 | 0.209 | 20.00 | 0.000 | ||
| −2.634 | 0.789 | −3.337 | 0.002 | −2.634 | 0.538 | −4.892 | 0.000 | ||
| 2.786 | 2.330 | 1.196 | 0.237 | 2.788 | 1.351 | 2.063 | 0.044 | ||
| C | 1.232 | 0.199 | 6.199 | 0.000 | ECT(-) | −0.004 | 0.001 | −7.221 | 0.000 |
| Diagnostic tests | |||||||||
| 0.996 | |||||||||
| AdjR2 | 0.995 | ||||||||
| DW statistics | 2.18 | ||||||||
| 825.1 [0.000] | |||||||||
| Bound tests | @ 5% | ||||||||
| Bound tests | @ 1% | ||||||||
| χ2
| 0.111 [0.963] | ||||||||
| χ2 | 31.79 [0.104] | ||||||||
*, **, and *** mirror 10%, 5%, and 1% significance level, respectively
Long-run asymmetries (WALD test)
| Variables | Decision | |
|---|---|---|
| GDP(Y) | 47.83*** [0.000] | Yes |
| IQ | 267.8***[0.000] | Yes |
| FDI | 62.37*** [0.000] | Yes |
| FF | 7.082***[0.008] | Yes |
| RE | 3.661* [0.056] | Yes |
*Indicates 1% significance level
Fig. 2Plot of cumulative sum of recursive residuals. The blue line is the solid line, while the red lines that bounded the blue line are the critical bounds at 0.5
Fig. 3Plot of cumulative sum square of recursive residuals. The blue line is the solid line, while the red lines that bounded the blue line are the critical bounds at 0.5
Fig. 4Multiplier for GDP, institutional quality, FDI, fossil fuels, and renewable energy consumption