Chongqing Tan1,2, Sini Li3, Lidan Yi1,2, Xiaohui Zeng4, Liubao Peng1,2, Shuxia Qin1,2, Liting Wang1,2, Xiaomin Wan5,6. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Rd., Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. 2. Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. 3. The Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. 4. PET Imaging Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. 5. Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Rd., Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. wanxiaomin@csu.edu.cn. 6. Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. wanxiaomin@csu.edu.cn.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who failed conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: An individual patient simulation model was used to estimate the lifetime cost and effectiveness. The comparator sequence commenced with etanercept, followed by rituximab-tocilizumab- non-biologic therapy. The intervention sequences were assumed to add tofacitinib to different positions in the comparator sequence. Quality-of-life estimates were generated by mapping Health Assessment Questionnaire scores to utility with the algorithm derived from a Chinese population. Scenario analyses, univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with the comparator sequence, patients receiving tofacitinib as the first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment gained additional 0.49, 0.59, 0.44 and 0.53 QALYs, respectively, and the use of tofacitinib as the first- and second-line treatment was less costly, whereas the use of tofacitinib as the third- and fourth-line treatment cost an additional $234,998 and $381,116, respectively. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $333.73 and $9669.34/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION: Tofacitinib is estimated to be dominant in both the first- and second-line settings and to be highly cost-effective in both the third- and fourth-line settings.
INTRODUCTION: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of tofacitinib for patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who failed conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs from the Chinese healthcare system perspective. METHODS: An individual patient simulation model was used to estimate the lifetime cost and effectiveness. The comparator sequence commenced with etanercept, followed by rituximab-tocilizumab- non-biologic therapy. The intervention sequences were assumed to add tofacitinib to different positions in the comparator sequence. Quality-of-life estimates were generated by mapping Health Assessment Questionnaire scores to utility with the algorithm derived from a Chinese population. Scenario analyses, univariable and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the model uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared with the comparator sequence, patients receiving tofacitinib as the first-, second-, third- and fourth-line treatment gained additional 0.49, 0.59, 0.44 and 0.53 QALYs, respectively, and the use of tofacitinib as the first- and second-line treatment was less costly, whereas the use of tofacitinib as the third- and fourth-line treatment cost an additional $234,998 and $381,116, respectively. This produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $333.73 and $9669.34/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSION:Tofacitinib is estimated to be dominant in both the first- and second-line settings and to be highly cost-effective in both the third- and fourth-line settings.
Authors: Joel Kremer; Zhan-Guo Li; Stephen Hall; Roy Fleischmann; Mark Genovese; Emilio Martin-Mola; John D Isaacs; David Gruben; Gene Wallenstein; Sriram Krishnaswami; Samuel H Zwillich; Tamas Koncz; Richard Riese; John Bradley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Roy Fleischmann; Eduardo Mysler; Stephen Hall; Alan J Kivitz; Robert J Moots; Zhen Luo; Ryan DeMasi; Koshika Soma; Richard Zhang; Liza Takiya; Svitlana Tatulych; Christopher Mojcik; Sriram Krishnaswami; Sujatha Menon; Josef S Smolen Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Gerd R Burmester; Ricardo Blanco; Christina Charles-Schoeman; Jürgen Wollenhaupt; Cristiano Zerbini; Birgitta Benda; David Gruben; Gene Wallenstein; Sriram Krishnaswami; Samuel H Zwillich; Tamas Koncz; Koshika Soma; John Bradley; Charles Mebus Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Josef S Smolen; Robert B M Landewé; Johannes W J Bijlsma; Gerd R Burmester; Maxime Dougados; Andreas Kerschbaumer; Iain B McInnes; Alexandre Sepriano; Ronald F van Vollenhoven; Maarten de Wit; Daniel Aletaha; Martin Aringer; John Askling; Alejandro Balsa; Maarten Boers; Alfons A den Broeder; Maya H Buch; Frank Buttgereit; Roberto Caporali; Mario Humberto Cardiel; Diederik De Cock; Catalin Codreanu; Maurizio Cutolo; Christopher John Edwards; Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings; Paul Emery; Axel Finckh; Laure Gossec; Jacques-Eric Gottenberg; Merete Lund Hetland; Tom W J Huizinga; Marios Koloumas; Zhanguo Li; Xavier Mariette; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Eduardo F Mysler; Jose A P da Silva; Gyula Poór; Janet E Pope; Andrea Rubbert-Roth; Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand; Kenneth G Saag; Anja Strangfeld; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Marieke Voshaar; René Westhovens; Désirée van der Heijde Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Eun Bong Lee; Roy Fleischmann; Stephen Hall; Bethanie Wilkinson; John D Bradley; David Gruben; Tamas Koncz; Sriram Krishnaswami; Gene V Wallenstein; Chuanbo Zang; Samuel H Zwillich; Ronald F van Vollenhoven Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jasvinder A Singh; Kenneth G Saag; S Louis Bridges; Elie A Akl; Raveendhara R Bannuru; Matthew C Sullivan; Elizaveta Vaysbrot; Christine McNaughton; Mikala Osani; Robert H Shmerling; Jeffrey R Curtis; Daniel E Furst; Deborah Parks; Arthur Kavanaugh; James O'Dell; Charles King; Amye Leong; Eric L Matteson; John T Schousboe; Barbara Drevlow; Seth Ginsberg; James Grober; E William St Clair; Elizabeth Tindall; Amy S Miller; Timothy McAlindon Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 10.995