Literature DB >> 33837875

Risky business, healthy lives: how risk perception, risk preferences and information influence consumer's risky health choices.

Jean Spinks1, Son Nghiem2, Joshua Byrnes2.   

Abstract

Consumer's understanding of health risks is a key determinant of effective risk communication about health care options. Individuals make decisions about their health under uncertainty, yet the influence of risk perception, risk preferences and information processing has not been well researched in the health economics literature. Here, a novel extension of the standard discrete choice experiment framework is developed to investigate the effect of a "risk shock" (the difference between an individual's perceived risk and updated information) on consumption and health care decisions. In the experiment, consumers were asked to evaluate a basket of health service and lifestyle choices to lower cardiovascular risk. While most individuals, on average, aim to lower their CVD risk to a level of 1.37% points below the updated information provided, the response was asymmetrical, whereby the response to a "negative shock" was less than a "positive shock". Furthermore, we find evidence that risk perception, rather than risk preferences, are more likely to affect consumer health and behaviour changes. Given the global pandemic of CVD, these findings suggest there are public health gains to be made from personalised risk communication if it is better tailored to account for individuals' preferences and risk perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk; Discrete choice experiment; Risk information; Risk perception; Risk preferences

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837875     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01291-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  5 in total

Review 1.  Understanding risk and lessons for clinical risk communication about treatment preferences.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

2.  Predicting health behaviors with an experimental measure of risk preference.

Authors:  Lisa R Anderson; Jennifer M Mellor
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 3.  Is it worth the risk? A systematic review of instruments that measure risk propensity for use in the health setting.

Authors:  James D Harrison; Jane M Young; Phyllis Butow; Glenn Salkeld; Michael J Solomon
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based method for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk: the NHANES I Follow-up Study cohort.

Authors:  Thomas A Gaziano; Cynthia R Young; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Sidney Atwood; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Health Risk Perception on Blockchain Traceable Fresh Fruits Purchase Intention in China.

Authors:  Qianqian Zhai; Ali Sher; Qian Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.