Literature DB >> 33837624

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Norepinephrine Outside the Intensive Care Setting for Treatment of Hepatorenal Syndrome.

Allison Kwong1, W Ray Kim1, Paul Y Kwo1, Uerica Wang2, Xingxing Cheng3.   

Abstract

Vasoconstrictors are the treatment of choice for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). We evaluate the real-life effectiveness of a sequential vasoconstrictor regimen of midodrine-octreotide followed by norepinephrine in a nonintensive care unit (non-ICU) setting in the United States, where terlipressin is not available. The diagnosis of HRS and definitions of response to therapy were based on 2015 guidelines from the International Club of Ascites. In adult patients with HRS without partial or full response to oral midodrine and subcutaneous octreotide, norepinephrine was administered at a starting dose of 5 mcg/minute, with a goal to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 10 mm Hg above baseline. We assessed predictors of response and treatment outcomes. A total of 61 patients were administered midodrine and octreotide for the treatment of HRS, with a 28% response rate. The median MELD-Na (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium) score was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 24-35). Responders were more likely to have alcohol-related liver disease and lower Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) grade. Of the nonresponders, 20 were then administered norepinephrine, of whom 45% achieved full or partial response. Achieving an MAP increase of ≥10 mm Hg was associated with a greater probability of response. Patients who responded to norepinephrine experienced improved transplant-free survival at 90 days (88% versus 27%; P = 0.02); 5 of 20 patients experienced norepinephrine treatment-related adverse events, namely arrhythmias. Norepinephrine can be effectively used in a non-ICU setting as rescue therapy in patients who have not responded to midodrine and octreotide. Based on these data, we propose a practical stepwise algorithm for vasoconstrictor therapy to manage HRS in situations where terlipressin is not an option.
Copyright © 2021 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837624     DOI: 10.1002/lt.26065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

Review 1.  Hepatorenal Syndrome Type 1: From Diagnosis Ascertainment to Goal-Oriented Pharmacologic Therapy.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Q Velez
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2021-12-03

2.  Terlipressin: Hopes Fulfilled or Dashed?

Authors:  Raimund H Pichler; Erik R Swenson; Peter J Leary; Cary H Paine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Management of hepatorenal syndrome in liver cirrhosis: a recent update.

Authors:  Chinmay Bera; Florence Wong
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.802

4.  CONFIRMing Hepatorenal Syndrome Management: #NephJC Editorial.

Authors:  Jamie Willows; Alicja Rydzewska-Rosołowska; Joel M Topf; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  Kidney Med       Date:  2021-08-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.