Literature DB >> 33837452

The impact of digitisation of a virtual fracture clinic on referral quality, outcomes and assessment times.

Benjamin M Sephton1, Hannah Morley2, Piyush Mahapatra3, Michael Shenouda4, Mustafa Al-Yaseen2, Darryl E Bernstein2, George Cross2, Daniel E Dalili2, Amrit Gurung2, Atul Kamat2, Andrew J Kuc2, Aisha R Mohammed2, Mehreen Paraouty2, Amsanaa Ponniah2, Ben Sluckis2, Krisztian Deierl2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become widely adopted, aiming to improve efficiency, standardise patient care and reduce clinic appointments for injuries that can be managed conservatively. A variety of means exist to manage VFC referrals and assessment, including paper-based and digital methods. This study assesses VFC referral quality and outcomes before and after implementation of a digital VFC referral and management system.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all VFC referrals and assessments from July 2017-March 2020 in a large UK district general hospital. All referrals and assessments were analysed for quality and completeness of referral information, grade of assessor, outcome of assessment, referral-to-assessment time, and assessment-to-surgery time (for those requiring operative management).
RESULTS: 3038 paper and 9,228 digital referrals were analysed by 2 separate reviewers. Quality and completeness of referral information showed significant improvement in 11 predetermined key data points with the digital referral system (p < 0.001). Date and mechanism of injury were the most commonly missing data criteria (67.5% and 68.2%, respectively) with paper referrals. Significant improvements were noted in the proportion of Consultant delivered VFC assessments (84.2% vs 71.0%; p < 0.001), VFC discharge rate (20.8% vs 13.1%; p < 0.001) and patients recalled for urgent review (6.2% vs 0.8%; p < 0.001) with digital referrals. Mean referral-to-assessment (31.2 vs 49.9 h; p < 0.001) and assessment-to-surgery (9.2 vs 13.0 days; p = 0.01) times also reduced significantly with referral digitisation.
CONCLUSION: Improvements in virtual referral quality and completeness directly lead to facilitation of more thorough, detailed and appropriate virtual assessments; improving timely decision-making, reducing unnecessary appointments, and permitting better prioritisation of workload and earlier surgery for patients requiring operative treatment. Purpose-built digital solutions are an excellent means of achieving these aims.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digitalisation; Digitisation; Orthopaedics; Trauma; Virtual fracture clinic

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33837452     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01661-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  1 in total

1.  Fracture clinic redesign: improving standards in patient care and interprofessional education.

Authors:  Odhrán Murray; Kate Christen; Andrew Marsh; Jens Bayer
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.193

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.